Theos-Talk Archives (May 2000 Message tt00368)

1x9=9
     2x9=18  1+8=9
     3x9=27  2+7=9
     4x9=36  3+6=9
     5x9=45  4+5=9
     6x9=54  5+4=9
     7x9=63  6+3=9
     8x9=72  7+2=9
     9x9=81  8+1=9
    10x9=90  9+0=9
    11x9=99  9+9=18  1+8=9
   12x9=108  1+0+8=9
   13x9=117  1+1+7=9  


LeonMaurer@aol.com wrote:
> 
> As I implied in my last post on this distortion of the original thread...
> This nonsense is not "theosophical principles and their relationship to
> science.
> 
> To end it all, here's the original root of all this ridiculous speculation
> about "nothing" (0) -- that has no place in a theosophical forum except to
> confuse every "one" (1)... Especially any scientists who might be listening
> in. ;-)
> 
> "Fe, phi, fo, fum" (said the Giant) "I smell the blood of an Englishman"
> (speaking of Jack the Giant killer)
> 
> LHM :-)
> 
> In a message dated 05/29/00 3:06:17 PM, kellogg@west.net writes:
> 
> >Birth = 1 + 8 + 7 + 9 + 7 = 32 = 3 + 2 = 5
> >
> >Death = 3  + 4 + 0 + 9 + 7 = 23 = 2 + 3 = 5
> >
> >Light = 2 + 8 + 6 + 7 + 9 = 32 = 3 + 2 = 5
> >
> >End = 4 + 3 + 3 = 10
> >
> >(In the beginning) = 8 + 3  +  9 + 7 + 4  +  1 + 4 + 6 + 8 + 3 + 3 + 8
> >+ 3 + 6 =
> >11 + 20 + 42 = 73 = 7 + 3 = 10
> >
> >End is in the beginning.
> >
> >
> >
> >Grant, O Father, that my mind may rise to Thy sacred throne.
> >Let it see the fountain of good.
> >Let it find light, so that the clear light of my soul may fix itself in
> >Thee.
> >Burn off the fogs and clouds of earth and shine through in Thy splendour.
> >For thou art the serenity, the tranquil peace of virtuous men.
> >The sight of Thee is the beginning and the end; one guide, leader, path
> >and goal.
> >
> >Boethius
> >
> >Spencer wrote:
> >
> >> Peter Merriott wrote:
> >>
> >>  And the 'fe' you were talking about,... how do you see that as similar
> >to
> >> 'phi'?
> >>
> >> HPB, at least once, said that everything could be reduced to various
> >> combinations of number, color and sound.  When sounded out, these two
> >do have
> >> some similarity.  A stretch to be sure.  But consider this:
> >>
> >> Life = (Li) + (Fe)
> >>
> >> In the Encyclopedia of Physics  one finds that Lithium (Li) is sometimes
> >used
> >> as a cooling agent in nuclear reactors.  Attachment occurs when iron
> >(Fe) comes
> >> in contact with a magnet.  Magnets have to do with attraction, attraction
> >with
> >> desire.  So one asks the question, "Why the word 'life' to describe the
> >process
> >> we call life?"  Why wasn't it called broccoli or something?  Are there
> >clues in
> >> the word itself?  Lithium, Iron.  Everywhere, in almost every tradition
> >one
> >> reads something to the effect that, if one wants to give the iron (Fe)
> >shackles
> >> or chains in one's life, opportunities abound.  Most involve dumping
> >or
> >> combating the attachments, the Iron (Fe) as manifested in the Universe
> >by Phi,
> >> with light and/or some idea of God or the Good.
> >>
> >> Good comes from the Sanskrit word 'gadh' meaning, "to fit."  Gadh, when
> >sounded
> >> out, bears a striking resemblance to God which also sounds similar to
> >'ght.'
> >>
> >> Give up the iron in ones life, the (Fe).  Relax into the good, pronounced
> >gadh,
> >> and your life will be light.  After all, "Life is light..."
> >>
> >> Spencer
> >>
> >> >
> >> > Thanks also for the qoutes.  I particularly like the one from Ramana
> >> > Maharshi:
> >> >
> >> > "We see what we want to see.  Eliminate
> >> > the want and we see things as they are."
> >> >
> >> > and the one from HPB
> >> >
> >> > "Time is the succession of states of consciousness........"
> >> >
> >> > ...Peter
> >> >
> >> > > -----Original Message-----
> >> > > From: owner-theos-talk@theosophy.com
> >> > > [mailto:owner-theos-talk@theosophy.com]On Behalf Of Spencer
> >> > > Sent: 27 May 2000 16:32
> >> > > To: theos-talk@theosophy.com
> >> > > Subject: Re: Theos-World Fundamental theosohical principles and their
> >> > > relationship toscience.
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > Peter Merriott wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > >  What then is the figure for 'fe' that makes it similar to 'phi'?
> >> > >
> >> > > Phi is the result of employing what is commonly known as The
> >> > > Golden Mean, The
> >> > > Golden Section, The Golden Proportion, The Divine Proportion.
> >> > > Consider any
> >> > > aspect of the manifested Universe, anything available on, in or under
> >the
> >> > > space-time continuum umbrella.  There is a point at which one may
> >> > > divide this
> >> > > aspect such that the ratio of the whole to the larger section is
> >> > > equal to the
> >> > > ratio of the larger piece to the smaller piece.  In other words,
> >> > > if one has
> >> > > line A and it is divided in sections B and C, then A/B = B/C.
> >> > > This also finds
> >> > > its representation in the number series represented by the
> >> > > equation, a + b = c,
> >> > > where the next number in the series is equal to the sum of the
> >> > > previous two
> >> > > numbers.  If we begin with 0 and 1, the series proceeds as follows:
> >> > >
> >> > > 0, 1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21, 34, 55, 89, ...
> >> > >
> >> > > As one proceeds out into the series, 8/13 =13/21 = 21/34 = 34/55
> >= 55/89 =
> >> > > 89/144.
> >> > >
> >> > > The constant these ratios are tending toward is known as phi,
> >> > > approximately
> >> > > 1.618 if expanding, or .618 if contracting.
> >> > >
> >> > > 34 * 1.6182 = approximately 55.
> >> > >
> >> > > 144 * .6182 = approximately 89.
> >> > >
> >> > > This constant, phi, can be seen nearly anywhere one cares to look
> >> > > in the world
> >> > > of matter.  It shows up in flower petal arrangements, seed patterns
> >on
> >> > > pinecones and sunflowers, underlying such human structures as the
> >> > > Parthenon and
> >> > > the Pyramids in Egypt.  One could even take a picture of the human
> >brain,
> >> > > construct a rectangle around it so that the edges of the brain touch
> >the
> >> > > rectangle and, beginning at the front, moving from left to right,
> >make a
> >> > > division at the Golden Section.  Then, moving from top to bottom
> >along the
> >> > > smaller piece make another division at the smaller piece.
> >> > > Continue doing so in
> >> > > alternating fashion and, eventually one has a spiral.  Where does
> >> > > it lead?  The
> >> > > end is in the beginning.
> >> > >
> >> > > "Desiring one may see the manifestations."           Lao Tzu
> >> > >
> >> > > "We must always remember that we are on
> >> > > the receiving end of the optic nerve."
> >> > > Robert Oppenheimer
> >> > >
> >> > > "We see what we want to see.  Eliminate
> >> > > the want and we see things as they are."                  Ramana
> >Maharshi
> >> > >
> >> > > "Knowing the beginning of time as the thread of Tao."        Lao
> >Tzu
> >> > >
> >> > > "Time is the succession of states of consciousness........"
> >      HPB
> >> > >
> >> > > It's interesting to note that when certain materials are cooled
> >> > > to temperatures
> >> > > approaching absolute zero the result is superconductivity.  How to
> >> > > superconduct?  Detach.
> >> > >
> >> > > e = mc^2
> >> > >
> >> > > Get rid of the 'matter' and one perhaps have the experience of c^2.
> >> > >
> >> > > And, Bart, just for fun:
> >> > >
> >> > > e = mc^2
> >> > >
> >> > > 4 = 0 + (2 * 2) =4
> >> > >
> >> > > Spencer
> >> > >
> >> > > "Desireless one may behold the mystery."              Lao Tzu
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > In your last post likening 'phi' to a bag of diamonds you added
> (perhaps
> >> > >
> >> > > > with the notion of magnetism in mind?) "Phi can be looked at one
> >way as
> >> > > > evidence of attachment."
> >> > > >
> >> > > > It led me to wonder whether 'phi' is about getting 'things' in
> >> > > proportion,
> >> > > > some kind of balance.  Perhaps too, magnetism could be seen in
> >> > > two ways - as
> >> > > > you say it has to do with attraction, but perhaps there is also
> >another
> >> > > > underlying attraction in the Universe which brings everything back
> >to
> >> > > > 'balance' or the 'zero' state.  Karma could be considered in
> >> > > this context.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Just playing with the ideas, as I sense you are too.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > ...Peter
> >> > > >
> >> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> >> > > > > From: owner-theos-talk@theosophy.com
> >> > > > > [mailto:owner-theos-talk@theosophy.com]On Behalf Of Spencer
> >> > > > > Sent: 27 May 2000 02:08
> >> > > > > To: theos-talk@theosophy.com
> >> > > > > Subject: Re: Theos-World Fundamental theosohical principles and
> >their
> >> > > > > relationship toscience.
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > Unless I am mistaken, it was Kepler who likened the Divine
> >> > > > > Proportion (phi) to a
> >> > > > > bag of diamonds.  He also likened the Pythagorean Theorem to
> >a
> >> > > > > bag of gold.  Phi
> >> > > > > can be looked at one way as evidence of attachment.
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > Spencer
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > Spencer wrote:
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > > If I said pi I apologize.  I meant phi, the Other constant.
> >> > > > > One might think of
> >> > > > > > it as pi manifesting.  As for the numbers, you're on the right
> >> > > > > track; a = 0, u
> >> > > > > > = 0 and m = 0.  Like I said, it probably means nothing.
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > Spencer
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > Peter Merriott wrote:
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > Hi Spencer,
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > What base are you using to translate letters into numbers?
> >I
> >> > > > > can see, at
> >> > > > > > > least I think I can, that you are using a=0, b=1, c=2 etc.
> >> > > > > But how does L=2
> >> > > > > > > if you are going from 0 to 9 repeatedly?   Could you also
> >say
> >> > > > > in what sense
> >> > > > > > > iron 'fe' resembles pi?
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > Thanks,
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > ...Peter
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > -----Original Message-----
> >> > > > > > > > From: owner-theos-talk@THEOSOPHY.COM
> >> > > > > > > > [mailto:owner-theos-talk@THEOSOPHY.COM]On Behalf Of Spencer
> >> > > > > > > > Sent: 26 May 2000 15:10
> >> > > > > > > > To: theos-talk@THEOSOPHY.COM
> >> > > > > > > > Subject: Re: Theos-World Fundamental theosohical principles
> >> > > > > and their
> >> > > > > > > > relationship toscience.
> >> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > Truth = 9 + 7 + 0 + 9 + 7 = 32 = 3 + 2 = 5
> >> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > Light = 2 + 8 + 6 + 7 + 9 = 32 = 3 + 2 = 5
> >> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > Buddha = 1 + 0 + 3 + 3 + 7 + 0 = 1 + 4 = 5
> >> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > Nature = 3 + 0 + 9 + 0 + 7 + 4 = 23 = 2 + 3 = 5
> >> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > Be-ness = 1 + 4 + 3 + 4 + 8 + 8 = 28 = 2 + 8 = 10
> >> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > Meaningful?  I don't know.  Meaningless?  Perhaps.  It's
> >> > > > > probably nothing.
> >> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > Life = 2 + 8 + 5 + 4 = 19 = 1 + 9 = 10
> >> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > Suffering = 8 + 0 + 5 + 5 + 4 + 7 + 8 + 3 + 6 = 46 = 4
> >+ 6 = 10
> >> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > Life is suffering.                 Gautama Buddha
> >> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > Life = suffering.                  Mathematical
> >> > > translation of 'is'
> >> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > Life = sufring   (fe)             Associative Property
> >> > > of Equality
> >> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > Life = surfing   (fe)             Commutative Property
> >> > > of Equality
> >> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > Life = surfing   (Fe)            Periodic Table symbol
> >for Iron
> >> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > Iron attaches to a magnet.  (Fe) bears a striking
> >> > > resemblance to the
> >> > > > > > > > mathematical constant, phi.
> >> > > > > > > > What does any of this mean, if anything?
> >> > > > > > > > Practice detachment.
> >> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > Spencer
> >> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > LeonMaurer@aol.com wrote:
> >> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > To set the record a bit straighter for those who read
> >these
> >> > > > > > > > numerological
> >> > > > > > > > > dialogues and who are not overly fascinated by apparently
> >> > > > > > > > mystical numbers
> >> > > > > > > > > that  -- while in many cases reflective of occult processes
> >--
> >> > > > > > > > are sometimes
> >> > > > > > > > > presented and taken totally out of context... Consider
> >> > > > > the following.
> >> > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > Without showing the logical basis of such numbers and
> >> > > > > their cabalistic
> >> > > > > > > > > reductions -- with direct reference to and
> >> > > correlation with the
> >> > > > > > > > nonlinear
> >> > > > > > > > > cyclic and spherical forces ("music of the spheres")
> >from
> >> > > > > which they
> >> > > > > > > > > originate and reflect -- could be entirely superficial
> >as well
> >> > > > > > > > as meaningless
> >> > > > > > > > > and misleading to most serious students of occult or
> >esoteric
> >> > > > > > > > theosophy --
> >> > > > > > > > > especially, beginners.
> >> > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > The "why" and "how" in these teachings and understandings
> >> > > > > are as equally
> >> > > > > > > > > important as the "what" and "wherefor."  The I Ching
> >is a good
> >> > > > > > > > example of
> >> > > > > > > > > this, since its  numbers and their relationships are
> >> > > > > simply a symbolic
> >> > > > > > > > > reflection of the esoteric teachings given out in its
> >> > > > > > > > commentaries, and have
> >> > > > > > > > > no fundamental meaning in themselves -- except to serve
> >> > > > > as an symbolic
> >> > > > > > > > > mathematical or geometric tool linking the objective
> >> > > questioner
> >> > > > > > > > indirectly
> >> > > > > > > > > with the subjectivity of the oracle -- whose metaphoric
> >> > > > > > > > pronouncements, as
> >> > > > > > > > > translated by the ancient Chinese Taoist philosophers,
> >still
> >> > > > > > > > requires, for
> >> > > > > > > > > proper interpretation, a profound and intuitive knowledge
> >of
> >> > > > > > > > the spherical
> >> > > > > > > > > and multidimnsional "tai-chi" forms of primal energy
> >> > > fields and
> >> > > > > > > > the nonlinear
> >> > > > > > > > > laws and relationships of their cycles and periodicities
> >> > > > > that require
> >> > > > > > > > > nonlinear forms of mathematical geometries -- yet to
> >be fully
> >> > > > > > > > understood or
> >> > > > > > > > > codified, except partially, perhaps, in the graphical
> >> > > > > interpretations of
> >> > > > > > > > > fractal and non-euclidian geometries used in the new
> >> > > > > sciences of chaos,
> >> > > > > > > > > "simplicity" and "complexity," as well as in some aspects
> >> > > > > of post modern
> >> > > > > > > > > quantum and sub-quantum physics such as Superstring and
> >> > > > > > > > Membrane theories.
> >> > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > Notice that HPB in the Secret Doctrine, always explained
> >> > > > > the occult
> >> > > > > > > > > derivations, relationships and significances whenever
> >she made
> >> > > > > > > > reference to
> >> > > > > > > > > cabalistic numbers.  The reason for this is that one
> >of the
> >> > > > > > > > main purposes of
> >> > > > > > > > > HPB's (and the Master's) exposure of esoteric theosophy
> >> > > > > was to help us
> >> > > > > > > > > simultaneously combine nonlinear and linear (abstract
> >and
> >> > > > > objective,
> >> > > > > > > > > macrocosmic and microcosmic, as above so below, etc.)
> >> > > > > > > > understandings, while
> >> > > > > > > > > closing the gap and opening the bridge between linear
> >> > > > > left brain and
> >> > > > > > > > > nonlinear right brain network-type thinking -- which,
> >to
> >> > > > > thoroughly
> >> > > > > > > > > comprehend the esoteric teachings, must be merged together.
> >> > > > > > > > Her purpose (as
> >> > > > > > > > > well as that of the Masters) was to awaken the intuition
> >> > > > > and assist in
> >> > > > > > > > > training the linear and nonlinear linked graphical
> imagination
> >> > > > > > > > of prospective
> >> > > > > > > > > chelas and possible future initiates... The opposite
> >of whom
> >> > > > > > > > would be the
> >> > > > > > > > > possibly brain washed blind believers in pseudo esoteric
> >> > > > > dogmas... As is
> >> > > > > > > > > observed among many members of organized religions and
> >> > > > > > > > followers of some so
> >> > > > > > > > > called psychic cultists and other neo-theosophists or
> >> > > "new age"
> >> > > > > > > > teachers --
> >> > > > > > > > > who would like to see a "new world order" based on
> >> > > hierarchical
> >> > > > > > > > and linear
> >> > > > > > > > > numbers with the masses under easy control of their rulers
> >> > > > > > > > (note the linear
> >> > > > > > > > > connotation of the word "rulers") while still maintaining
> >> > > > > a semblance of
> >> > > > > > > > > individual choice.
> >> > > > > > > > > The quickest way to accomplish such mind control would
> >be
> >> > > > > to teach their
> >> > > > > > > > > members to either concentrate solely on the abstract
> >> > > level of pure
> >> > > > > > > > > spirituality as well as its associated rituals (which
> >> > > makes them
> >> > > > > > > > > non-resistors to their "controllers" or "gurus" mystical
> >> > > > > > > > pronouncements), or
> >> > > > > > > > > focus on the concrete level of numbers, formulas, letters
> >and
> >> > > > > > > > words (which
> >> > > > > > > > > gives them an inclination to confine their thinking into
> >> > > > > an externally
> >> > > > > > > > > determined linear order that blindly follows their
> >> > > leader's ends).
> >> > > > > > > > > Unfortunately, this is highly prevalent, today, in
> >> > > many schools
> >> > > > > > > > of so called
> >> > > > > > > > > esoteric teachings, some of which profess to be based
> >on
> >> > > > > fundamental
> >> > > > > > > > > theosophy.
> >> > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > It's good to remember, in light of the above, that the
> >DNA
> >> > > > > > > > linear numerical
> >> > > > > > > > > code, for example, cannot function unless it is linked
> >to
> >> > > > > the actual
> >> > > > > > > > > multidimensional nonlinear Astral fields that organically
> >> > > > > empower the
> >> > > > > > > > > proteins and magnetically guides their elements into
> >> > > > > their 3-dimensional
> >> > > > > > > > > chemical forms and body positions.  Is this the reason
> >that
> >> > > > > > > > while science can
> >> > > > > > > > > superficially observe, count, and analyze the structure
> >> > > > > of the genes
> >> > > > > > > > > themselves, as well as understand the physical nature
> >of the 4
> >> > > > > > > > chemical bases
> >> > > > > > > > > of amino acids that compose the genetic code, they can't
> >> > > > > > > > entirely explain how
> >> > > > > > > > > such codes work to actually build and position the
> >> > > > > 3-dimensional protein
> >> > > > > > > > > molecules or biological organisms that the DNA-RNA
> >> > > > > (strings of code)
> >> > > > > > > > > partially serves to guide?  They see only what they believe
> >to
> >> > > > > > > > be the cause
> >> > > > > > > > > and the effect, but have little understanding of the
> >actual
> >> > > > > > > > coenergetic field
> >> > > > > > > > > related processes in between.  Perhaps if scientists
> >> > > > > could recognize the
> >> > > > > > > > > existence of an Astral body which is formed of pure field
> >> > > > > interference
> >> > > > > > > > > patterns of magnetic energy in a higher order dimensional
> >> > > > > > > > space, they would
> >> > > > > > > > > have no trouble explaining these fundamental
> >> > > processes of life,
> >> > > > > > > > as well as
> >> > > > > > > > > evolution, and their linkages to the DNA code.
> >> > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > Please don't take these observations as any denial of
> >the
> >> > > > > validity of
> >> > > > > > > > > esoteric numerology (which can be very useful as both
> >> > > > > > > > confirmation of occult
> >> > > > > > > > > principles as well as in the recognition of analogies
> >and
> >> > > > > > > > correspondences) --
> >> > > > > > > > > but simply, as food for thought in self-determining its
> >> > > > > value in helping
> >> > > > > > > > > better understand the fundamental principles and the
> >> > > derivative
> >> > > > > > > > teachings of
> >> > > > > > > > > theosophy along with its roots in esoteric occultism.
> >> > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > LHM
> >> > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > In a message dated 05/24/00 7:33:06 PM,
> >> > > kellogg@west.net writes:
> >> > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > >> <SNIP>
> >> > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > >> As above, so below:
> >> > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > >As (above) so (below)
> >> > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > >As 01414 so 14242
> >> > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > >As  0 + 1 + 4 + 1 + 4 so 1 + 4 + 2 + 4 + 2
> >> > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > >As 10 so 13
> >> > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > >As 10 so 1 + 3
> >> > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > >As 10 so 4
> >> > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > >The difference is six.
> >> > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > >60 = 6 + 0 = 6
> >> > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > >Descent = 3 + 4 + 8 + 2 + 4 + 3 + 9
> >> > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > >Descent = 33 = 3 + 3 = 6
> >> > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > >Tetragrammaton = 9 + 4 + 9 + 7 + 0 + 6 + 7 + 0 + 0 +
> >0 +
> >> > > > > 0 + 9  + 4 + 3
> >> > > > > > > > > >= 58 =
> >> > > > > > > > > >5 + 8 = 13 = 1 + 3 = 4
> >> > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > >Tetraktis =  9 + 4 + 9 + 7 + 0 + 1 + 9 + 8 + 8 = 55
> >= 5
> >> > > > > + 5 = 10, "The
> >> > > > > > > > > >Sacred
> >> > > > > > > > > >Pythagorean number Number."
> >> > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > ><SNIP>
> >> > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > >Spencer
> 
> -- THEOSOPHY WORLD -- Theosophical Talk -- theos-talk@theosophy.com
> 
> Letters to the Editor, and discussion of theosophical ideas and
> teachings. To subscribe or unsubscribe, send a message consisting of
> "subscribe" or "unsubscribe" to theos-talk-request@theosophy.com.

-- THEOSOPHY WORLD -- Theosophical Talk -- theos-talk@theosophy.com

Letters to the Editor, and discussion of theosophical ideas and
teachings. To subscribe or unsubscribe, send a message consisting of
"subscribe" or "unsubscribe" to theos-talk-request@theosophy.com.