Theos-Talk Archives (October 1999 Message tt00032)

Ok Frank ... I understand where you are coming from, my good thoughts are for
healing your wounded heart.

Time never lies.

Martin Leiderman
in West Los Angeles




Frank Reitemeyer wrote:

> From: Martin Leiderman <martinle@lainet.com>> My reply:
> >  Ugly words !!!!!  .....  Wherever TS group Frank R. belongs ... please
> count
> > me out. I want nothing to do with that organization. Inquisition is back.
> > Fanaticism is back,  and by the help of the internet !!!!
>
> TRUTH belongs to NO organization, whether its called esoterically or
> theosophical or something else. Truth is a state of consciousness.
> The last decades has shown that in the Theosophical Movement is something
> wrong.
> Not at least this may be the reason why the Messenger for the last quarter
> in the 20.th century didn't appeared among Theosophists, don't?
> You say fighting for the truth among Theosophists and against lies and
> hypocrisies is Inquisition.
> So we hold totally contrary views about the term. The more when you are deny
> the problems that there are really ARE (no matter how we judge or feel about
> them) and therefore make uninformed, innocent people and newbees belief that
> it is wrong to separate the technical teachings from the person who
> represents this - than, my dear, you a praying Black Magic and not the pukka
> Theosophy.
>
> The aim of the Dark Brothers is to make the students of the occult believe
> that the wrong doings of persons (even if they are/where prominent
> Theosophists) should to be laid aside - because they themselves are the
> source of the evil doings and don't like to be disturbed in their
> dissolution work.
>
> Sad to see such a reply from anyone of this list. Theosophy is NOT
> emotionalism and it seems you didn't got this point.
> With this twisted attitude of your reply you, to be logical, leads to the
> conclusion that you don't like to study HPB's works as they may, from your
> point of view, full of attacks against many people and lack therefore, from
> your twisted view, "fanatism" and "ugly words".
>
> Your reply is most dangerous - as it results in the risk to narcotize the
> minds of the newbees. Glass over things is not the path which makes the
> occult student, but rather the development of discrimination.
> The Black Magican catch their followers almost with the most holy words.
> So every student seeking for truth cares not if the words are looking "bad"
> or "ugly" (with which measure?), but for the inner motives behind them.
> So our own words fall back to yourself.
> It's really not too late to turn, as you said. Your choice.
> Frank
>
> -- THEOSOPHY WORLD -- Theosophical Talk -- theos-talk@theosophy.com
>
> Letters to the Editor, and discussion of theosophical ideas and
> teachings. To subscribe or unsubscribe, send a message consisting of
> "subscribe" or "unsubscribe" to theos-talk-request@theosophy.com.


-- THEOSOPHY WORLD -- Theosophical Talk -- theos-talk@theosophy.com

Letters to the Editor, and discussion of theosophical ideas and
teachings. To subscribe or unsubscribe, send a message consisting of
"subscribe" or "unsubscribe" to theos-talk-request@theosophy.com.