[MASTER INDEX] [DATE INDEX] [THREAD INDEX] [SUBJECT INDEX] [AUTHOR INDEX] |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Jun 26, 1999 08:24 AM
by Nick Weeks
> << > "In such a great work as this Movement no one should expect to find his > > associates all congenial, intuitive, prudent or courageous. One of the > > first proofs of self-mastery is when one shows that he can be kind and > > forbearing and genial with companions of the most dissimilar characters > and > > temperaments. One of the strongest signs of retrogression when one shows > > that he expects others to like what he likes and act as he acts. You > know > > whom of you the cap fits." > > > > Words to live by -- don't you think? > > Nicholas > > Hi Nicholas, > > In essence I couldn't agree with you more, what you describe is the way > things SHOULD work. The masters comments are all about the way things OUGHT > to work. However, what gets manifested on the physical plane is rampant > ignorance of spiritual laws and the comforting safety of modern "clique-ism." > The clique not only "expects" its members to like what everyone else likes, > etc., but rewards them for it. As a matter of fact, individuals who are > against that standard, often get punished for it. > I am not talking about just teenage subculture groups here, but "in groups" > of every kind. Domestic, educational, social, occupational, political, all > have their "good old boy" cliques. And the expectation IS that everyone will > act the same and like the same things. All wear the "same hat" as it were. It > leaves one wondering what M would be saying about today's forms of increased > retrogression. > > Louis Although the conscience has a much harder time influencing we moderns who live within, so often, the vicious vapors of "civilization" -- it still can touch us. It is very much an individual conscience and I think the Master was speaking only of the personal response, not the group. But it is a very difficult task. Don't we all like, even prefer, to associate with "like-minded" folks? Universal Brotherhood in practice means not always avoiding the uncongenial and seeking the congenial associates -- which implies much more richness and even quarreling within a group. Another Adept quote (which I do not have in front of me) says something like "we are expand our sympathies, not contract them" as the years roll by. Nicholas -- THEOSOPHY WORLD -- Theosophical Talk -- theos-talk@theosophy.com Letters to the Editor, and discussion of theosophical ideas and teachings. To subscribe or unsubscribe, send a message consisting of "subscribe" or "unsubscribe" to theos-talk-request@theosophy.com.