[MASTER INDEX] [DATE INDEX] [THREAD INDEX] [SUBJECT INDEX] [AUTHOR INDEX] |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Apr 07, 1999 08:23 AM
by Peter Merriott
> >>...your original arguments to defend the concept of enlightenment in > one lifetime, regardless of the practices of previous lifetimes, as > being the "only" possibility, and that all other views are wrong-...>> > > Dear Leon, if you want to denigrate what I say, that is your > right, but please repeat what I said properly. I never said > anything like "regardless of the practices of previous lifetimes" which > would be impossible. Jerry, I think the point Leon is refering to is that you spent so so many posts arguing that 'liberation in a single lifetime' was the only valid view to hold. You argued repeatedly that any other view that included believing in a number of lifetimes ahead of us or even just the *seven* of the Chela was "self defeating". According to you, Theosophists who believed this were, fearfull of liberation, afraid to Try and Dare, would be reborn because they believed they would be etc and on and on. And yet at the end of all those posts you said you don't agree with this view either, but consider it as an extreme. Peter -- THEOSOPHY WORLD -- Theosophical Talk -- theos-talk@theosophy.com Letters to the Editor, and discussion of theosophical ideas and teachings. To subscribe or unsubscribe, send a message consisting of "subscribe" or "unsubscribe" to theos-talk-request@theosophy.com.