Theos-Talk Archives (February 1999 Message tt00132)

>I think you are quite right to raise the questions you have if the
situation
>was as you describe it.  However, from the little I know of Rich, from his
>postings to this group, I have no reason to doubt his word that there is no
>such group.

Accepted. Remains the question why the books of G. de Purucker were so much
altered and if those who were/are responsible for that also study these
texts or if they use the original texts - this would be elitism and a gross
violations of the expressed wishes and orders of the authors who wants the
books be printed unaltered for the readers and even in cases were "errors"
been found allowed only additions in square brackets. Why do they do that?
Are there two classes of Theosophists which GdeP could no foreseen? Why has
a reader of today not the right to read the pure GdeP? Suppose this policy
would be followed by Wheaton with the texts of HPB?
Frank




-- THEOSOPHY WORLD -- Theosophical Talk -- theos-talk@theosophy.com

Letters to the Editor, and discussion of theosophical ideas and
teachings. To subscribe or unsubscribe, send a message consisting of
"subscribe" or "unsubscribe" to theos-talk-request@theosophy.com.