Theos-Talk Archives (November 1998 Message tt00504)

>Extrapolating from the Book of Dzyan, the SD commentaries, and the three
>fundamental propositions or principles, we can infer that not only does the
>Absolute consist of "abstract motion" -- which can only be imagined as
>infinite spins around a point of zero attributes -- but, further, these
spins
>must be the resolution of and contain all the information (in the form of
>holographic interference patterns) experienced by the previous universe,
>holistically, prior to its maha pralaya.

Well, I for one, can't make such an inference. Motion is an expression,
together with Space, of the Absolute. The Absolute is outside of
space-time, while Motion (purusha, subjectivity) and Space (prakriti,
objectivity) are inside.


>This would. of course, also include
>the spiritualized memories of each individual ego, as it traveled through
its
>myriads of incarnated existences during this prior period.

I do not believe for a second that such memories exist,
nor are they needed.


>  Since these
>primal spins ("seven robes of the eternal mother") also represent the
>different planes extending from the past, present and future spiritual
worlds
>to the material worlds--when the "mother" awakens and enters into its new
maha
>manvantara, all these spins emanate, (or radiatively "inflate" as
post-modern
>science expresses it) and step down through the vibratory fields of the
three
>logos until, at the "big bang".

The Big Bang theory has recently come under a lot of fire. It has to be
tweeked a lot in order to force it to fit the world we see today (which
is NOT homogenous or linear at all). I prefer S Hawkings' no-boundary
model which is slowly gaining ground in physics.


>Understanding that all these rays from spirit through mind to matter
emanate
>from the one source may give us the inner "picture" that answers all of the
>above questions. . .  And, whose answer could only be?  (1) Because it was
>always there, (2) it always had it, (3) the fundamental laws of spin or
cycles
>guide it, and (4) its ultimate goal is for us to find out who and what we
>really are, where we are going, and how we get there.
>>

This sounds like good answers.


>>Of what value is the concept of Karma or the equipoise of all
>>Nature ?
>
>Its value to us is only in understanding it, and placing our individual
>nature's in harmony with the nature of the Universe by working with its
>fundamental LAW. of Karma, or harmonious cyclic action (based solely on
>original s(p)in:-)--and, thereby, realizing who we are, where we came from,
>why we made the trip, and how we will be able to return--immensely, if not
>infinitely wiser than when we started this cycle of our existence.
>

Well, I agreed with you right up to the last business of being
"infinitely wiser than when we started" which implies a spiral
rather than a circle. I have a lot of trouble with spirals, which
have to start and end somewhere. Circles are neater because
they have no beginning or end points. A circle takes us right
back to where we started, sort of like assuming our Original Face.

Jerry S.