Theos-Talk Archives (November 1998 Message tt00252)

I'm the first person, you're the second person, earlier today I was in the
third person........

Dallas,

Slander? That's a purely subjective call. Just because someone smoked
Marijuana for pain relief of their debilitating illness is no reason to
think less of them. Marijuana is a completely safe and benificial medicine
supplied by Mother Earth to cure what ails ya'.

It's only slander if you take it that way, I'm sure HPB wouldn't. The AMA
(Australian) have recently conceded that Marijuana is far less harmful than
either Tobacco or Alcohol.

It is views like yours that keep the world in the dark ages. Drug reform is
THE big next step for world spiritualism.

The pharmaceutical TNC's do not want people to be able to supply their own
medicines - Look at the laws that are now being passed in 'public interest'
- for example Comfrey, which has been used safely for over 2000 years has
now been banned from over the counter sales - And yet more people died from
VIAGRA than all the Ecstacy deaths ever - And most of these reported deaths
weren't even Ecstacy but more toxic derivatives.

And anyway, how could HPB be in the ES if she smoked Tobacco?

You really must get over your social programming, automaton.

Kindest Warmest Fuzziest Wishes,

The Third Person

Darren (the same as D. Porter if you check the headers)




At 07:49 AM 11/16/98 -0800, you wrote:
>Nov 16th 1998
>
>Dear Bart:
>
> Subject: HPB "smoked hashish" -- attributed to "D. Porter"
>
>  Just because someone named D Porter wrote slander is no reason
>for broadcasting it.  I though you had some definite source and
>it was provable.
>
>If it is not, why air it ?
>
>What is the exact source, Book ?  Article  ?  etc....
>
>Dallas
>
> From: Bart Lidofsky
>Sent:	Sunday, November 15, 1998 5:45 PM
>Subject: Re: BloodSugarSexMagik
>
>W. Dallas TenBroeck wrote:
>> Dear Bart:
>>
>> Other than hearsay (where ?) there is no known evidence that
>HPB
>> smoked "hashish" or anything except tobacco.  Now if you do
>have
>> some reference that is valid I would like to hear of it.
>
>	D. Porter said it, not me. All I said was that even if she did,
>it was
>not considered to be illicit until 3-4 decades after she died
>(there's a
>rather interesting story as to HOW it became considered to be
>illicit,
>but that's not relevant here).
>
>	Bart Lidofsky
>
>
>