theos-talk.com

[MASTER INDEX] [DATE INDEX] [THREAD INDEX] [SUBJECT INDEX] [AUTHOR INDEX]

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: RE: Theosophical History == Mr. P. Johnson's opinions

Nov 09, 1998 02:41 PM
by Frank Reitemeyer


Friends, we should not enter word plays. It is clear what Dallas meant when
he wrote about the spiritual soul. The spiritual soul is the spiritual soul
and not the divine soul nor the human soul.

Frank


>>The basic concept is that at the core of each person is the REAL
>>SPIRITUAL SOUL.  It is eternal and never "dies."  It has
>>"eternity" within which to study and to learn - reaching always
>>for that final TRUTH.  >
>
>
>Dallas, is the above your own idea or is this taught in ULT?
>The reason I ask is that I like to think of myself as a theosophist,
>but don't agree with your "basic concept" above at all. I think you
>are confusing soul (learning while dying) and spirit (eternal but
>with no need to learn anything). If we can't agree on basic
>concepts, then how are we ever going to come to any kind of
>consensus or theosophical unification?
>
>Jerry S.










[Back to Top]


Theosophy World: Dedicated to the Theosophical Philosophy and its Practical Application