Theos-Talk Archives (September 1998 Message tt00056)

What is of some significance is that it was only after HPB died that it
became "To form a nucleus... Before she died it was "To form the nucleus of
a Universal Brotherhood of Man....
The point being, if it is A nucleus, there is a tendency to think it means
to form a nucleus of me/my/our group, a nucleus of many.  What in fact we
tend to do. What was in (worth thinking about), or not in, the minds of
those that decided to alter the first object after HPB died?  Did they
really think it through, or know occultly what they were doing, like the
MAHATMAS and HPB did?

When referring to the upper imperishable triad ("3 eternals?" "one")
To form THE nucleus, i.e. To form higher MANAS.  The MANAS rather than a manas.
of a Universal Brotherhood of humanity, i.e.,  of Atma-Buddhi, Atma-Buddhi
being the "2" Universal Principles.

Tony
>


>Martin Leiderman wrote:
>>
>>This is why, in my opinion, the TS was formed, with its  3 objects as
>>they evolved in todays words are meant to form a union of people, in
>>harmony,  sharing the highest knowledge (Wisdom-Religion), and this is
>>Brotherhood. An Ideal and Idea  of the future humanity, in a small
>>degree,  in the TS.  Is it possible to do while we have this coat of
>>matter, or as Tony asks:  "Are we sure it is possible to do it
>>personaly?"
>
>>
>>I hope Ramadoss is right and the internet nay bring people together.
>>Even though I still prefer looking to the eyes of my fellows.
>>
>>Any thoughts?
>
>Martin.... you have brought up a very important point here: "Is it (to form
a nucleous of Universal Brotherhood of Humanity) possible to do while we
have this coat of matter, ...."
>
>My answer and contribution to this discussion is:  YES,  and it is the only
way to make this action---significant.  That is the reason that we come into
incarnation---to learn to see through the thick veil of matter and
understand, in spite of having an ego (personality).
>
>Rudy
>