theos-talk.com

[MASTER INDEX] [DATE INDEX] [THREAD INDEX] [SUBJECT INDEX] [AUTHOR INDEX]

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: Up the creek

Aug 15, 1998 07:03 AM
by Dallas TenBroeck


August 15th 1998

Dear Kym:

Thanks for your comments.  May I proceed ?

Your questions are largely answered. when you seem to desire some degree of
understanding of what theosophy states, in THE KEY TO THEOSOPHY.  There is a
good INDEX for that book and if it is used some of the difficulties in
understanding Theosophical teaching vanish.  I do not mean to "ignore" your
questions, only to save some time and not just repeat what is already
available there.

If you also read the rest of the daily postings you will have noticed that
the question of Masters and their existence has been well described and
debated.  In replying I try to take into account all that is floating about
that seems relevant.

The difference between the "Individuality" and the personality" ought o be
investigated and studied from the theosophical point of view of psychology
to grasp what is meant in regard to Masters.

In THE KEY TO THEOSOPHY and  elsewhere in her Articles and the SECRET
DOCTRINE  HPB has dealt with the subject.  Have you found time to look into
what is there ?

With best wishes to you,

Dallas

> Date: Friday, August 14, 1998 4:41 PM
> From: "Kym Smith" <kymsmith@micron.net>
> Subject: Up the creek

>Dallas wrote:
>
>>All your questions about deserving or non-deserving can only be answered
>>interiorly, if you question your own motives, knowledge and purpose for
such
>>a contact.
>
>Yet, again, you have ignored my questions to you.  Well, no matter - I
>expected such - however, I doubt I will find the answer to where I used
>"barnyard terms" or how Dallas himself thinks regarding his own
>extra-responsibility in THE KEY TO THEOSOPHY.  Is there a page in THE KEY
>TO THEOSOPHY that talks about you specifically and one that speaks of Kym's
>horrifying terminology?  Odd, I don't recall there being any.
>
>Also, it is HPB, and not me, who INSISTED the "Masters" were real, walking,
>talking, human beings.  So, for a person (and I am not one of them) to wish
>for a physical visit from the "Masters" has had the seed of such a wish
>planted in them from HPB.
>
>Oh, and, the "Masters" still visited HPB even though she smoked, cursed,
>and engaged in some other indulgences, such as over-eating.  Why she
>married, then never foogie-foogied with her husbands (she had more than
>one, it is said) is a mystery.
>
>But the point is: The "Masters" seem to visit those who do NOT adhere very
>strictly to what is supposed to make one in the physical sense, according
>to some folks on this list, trucking down the path of "spirituality."
>
>Which means: NO ONE can really claim any knowledge as to whom a "Master"
>would choose to dine with since none of us can ever know what is in
>someone's heart.
>
>Which means:  At this point, we are all in the running for such a visit -
>or we are all in the same boat.  Well, hot dog!  Grab a paddle, Dallas, and
>have a seat - you can sit next to me if you want, but I get the cushion
>since you've been so liverish.
>
>
>Kym
>
>
>
>
>
>





[Back to Top]


Theosophy World: Dedicated to the Theosophical Philosophy and its Practical Application