Theos-Talk Archives (August 1998 Message tt00099)

David Green wrote:
>
> But I'll be damned, I can't understand
> how informed & rational persons could
> accept Masters of "The Mahatma
> Letters" & also believe in ECP's
> Masters.  I'm sure Govert is sincere
> in his belief.  No doubt. No doubt.
> I'm just saying I find such belief
> irrational.

I, too, find the traditional Theosophical teachings and those of ECP to be of
similar vibration and pointing in the same direction. I believe ECP's masters
and Blavatsky's adepts in some cases are the same individuals and when not, at
least belonging to the same spiritual "family". I am known among my friends,
associates, etc to be a fairly balanced and rational person.

> ECP's Masters are all goody-good &
> sugary sweet.

You say this due to ignorance. Let me prove it to you:

> Why do you think, O sons of God upon earth, that you sense the tiredness and the fatigue in your own bodies when you ought to be young, youthful, and virile? Why, this generation is experiencing the very stealing of the light, as though robbers would break in and leave no trace of their coming or of their going.
> 	These fallen angels, by deliberate design, have lusted after your light! They have come for you! They pipe their tunes and you dance.
> 	Shame on you!
> 	Light-bearers from the sun, I call you home! I rebuke you, I warn you, and I say: Leave them! Leave them all! For you have no part with them. And if you tarry, you enter unmistakably the death coil.
> 	Death is an addiction on earth in all of its forms! It becomes the binding habit of nicotine or alcohol or self-abuse or rock or drugs. Every addiction has its withdrawal syndrome, its crisis. You must be willing to withstand the inconvenience and the discomfort.
							Maha Chohan 82

> I regard Mrs Blavatsky's writings
> & Mahatma Letters as reliable but not as
> sacred.

I would dare to guess that the reasons you do so are very similar to my reasons
for also regarding ECP's writings as reliable (read her book on Kabhala!)