Theos-Talk Archives (August 1998 Message tt00079)

Murrary wrote:

>The question of whether - and if so, how - the Adepts
>can be approached
>today is one of the most serious issues facing the
>organizational T.S. today.

----------------------------------------------------
        Personally, I don't think it should be worried about.
We have the teachings of HPB, so the need to contact
an adept of Blavatsky's lodge  is not longer necessary to
get teachings.   99.99%  +  of people  don't need to meet
one except for selfish or pruient reasons.  I say don't worry
about them, and work for humanity and one's own self for
ten incarnations - then worry about it.  ' And by that time
one will probably realize that what is important is the
message and not personal contacts.  "Too much cant
about Masters" as I think that 1900 letter to Annie Besant
said.

D. Caldwell wrote:

>I really don't understand a person's MINDSET that will
>accept individaul
>Theosophical adepts but won't accept the possibility that
>these adepts
>belong to a organized group.
-----------------------------------------------------
       I think some just have a quirk of perversity.  By being
contrary as a general principle they get an ego-boost and
for no other reason.

         I wonder why Dallas's posting was the only one I
couldn't save to disk - I tried several times.  Maybe a hack
is on?

     Two recommended videos (R rating):  "Where the Day
 Takes You" about a group of teenage runaways (or
escapees as it may be..)  and "Where the River Flows
North" about a backwoods Individualist.

ELDON:   Did you say that they are retro-fitting the
Mercury Rockets?

          -  Jake J.

            " Beware of gift-givers!  (One's after me now!)"