Re:Question: new messenger?
Apr 06, 1998 09:37 AM
by Fernando de Freitas
You are sure! Certainly I think that Krisnamurti is respectable.
Not necessarily by contact with "masters" or another suppost
authority...(that, I agree, may be questionable) but by the "knowledge"
found in his speaks and writtes.
The same "knowledge" that make the non-theosophical people and
non-religious scientific people recognize him like "one of bigs, if not the
biggest, philosopher of XX Century".
Who can says that it is wrong? Or fanaticism? Your "Masters" or another
De: Jeffrey Michael Hoover <Jeffrey.Hoover@InternetMCI.com>
Para: firstname.lastname@example.org <email@example.com>
Data: Domingo, 5 de Abril de 1998 23:18
Assunto: Re:Question: new messenger?
Fernando de Freitas Said Sunday, April 05, 1998 6:36 PM:
>Very well, Bart!
>Out of original context, important quotes can be used like "perversions"...
>That's the reason why Krishnamurti always alert against the danger of
With all do respect, you seem overly enamored by the beauty of this guy
Krishnamurti! It seems he may have some good parts of questioning
however, I believe one must always express the utmost respect for his Guru
those who led him along.
I my humble opinion, one who does not show respect, is not a Messenger.
out the absolute grace balanced by judgement of EPC for yourself. That
is a good indicator of Mesengership.
[Back to Top]
Dedicated to the Theosophical Philosophy and its Practical Application