Theos-Talk Archives (April 1998 Message tt00061)

 You are sure! Certainly I think that Krisnamurti is respectable.
Not necessarily by contact with "masters" or another suppost
authority...(that, I agree, may be questionable) but by the "knowledge"
found in his speaks and writtes.
 The same "knowledge" that make the non-theosophical people and
non-religious scientific people recognize him like "one of bigs, if not the
biggest, philosopher of XX Century".
 Who can says that it is wrong? Or fanaticism? Your "Masters" or another
prophet?

Fraternally,
FdF

-----Mensagem original-----
De: Jeffrey Michael Hoover <Jeffrey.Hoover@InternetMCI.com>
Para: theos-talk@theosophy.com <theos-talk@theosophy.com>
Data: Domingo, 5 de Abril de 1998 23:18
Assunto: Re:Question: new messenger?

Fernando de Freitas Said Sunday, April 05, 1998 6:36 PM:

>Very well, Bart!
>Out of original context, important quotes can be used like "perversions"...
>That's the reason why Krishnamurti always alert against the danger of
>"quotes".

Mr. Freitas,

With all do respect, you seem overly enamored by the beauty of this guy
Krishnamurti! It seems he may have some good parts of questioning
authority;
however, I believe one must always express the utmost respect for his Guru
and
those who led him along.

I my humble opinion, one who does not show respect, is not a Messenger.
Check
out the absolute grace balanced by judgement of EPC for yourself. That
alone
is a good indicator of Mesengership.

Jeffrey