Theos-Talk Archives (April 1998 Message tt00027)

At 12:32 AM 4/5/1998 -0600, you wrote:
>M K Ramadoss wrote Saturday, April 04, 1998 11:00 PM:
>
>>Could there be others who are also messengers?
>
>That is an interesting question. There is one point that is not entirely
clear
>to me in HBP's writings. First, HPB says this person will come between
>1975-1999. After which she says it would be too late. Notice additionally,
>that she says the person is a "HE." ECP is a "SHE." As well as the
knowledge
>that Summit Lighthouse is not Theosophy organization. Please notice the text
>repeated
>below and then my additional comments following.
>
>> united body of people ready to welcome the new torch-bearer
>> of Truth. He will find the minds of men prepared for his message, a
language
>> ready for him in which to clothe the new truths he brings, an organization
>> awaiting his arrival, which will remove the merely mechanical, material
>> obstacles and difficulties from his path."
>> --H.P. Blavatsky, The Key to Theosophy
>> (London: Theosophical Publishing Co., 1889), pp. 306-307.
>
>G. de Purucker mentions in the appendix area of FOUNTAIN-SOURCE OF
OCCULTISM
>that HBP said she would return after another person had started an
organization
>for HPB to work within. That seems to match the text above. I don't have
>Puruckers book to refer to at this moment. If someone could look it up
and add
>it into this information, I would appreciate it very much as it would
complete
>some thoughts I am having regarding this subject! I would return the favor
>gladly in some other way!
>
>Mr. Ramadoss, do you have any additional thoughts or supporting information
>based on Theosophy regarding this subject as I would appreciate them in my
own
>search for the answer to your question?
>
> Sincerely,
>
> J M Hoover

HPB was very clear about the messenger to be expected this century. From
what I have read, Krishnamurti fits the scenario except that he did not
pursue the plan that was expected of him by Annie Besant and Leadbeater.
With all the hype and the tremendous influence that Annie Besant had and
also the very close relationship Krishnaji had with her -- he always
referred her as mother -- he came out with the startling stand that "Truth
is a Pathless Land" and no organization or no system can take one to Truth.
He stuck to it rest of his life with no wavering or modification.

Considering the huge number of people who have been affected by
Krishnamurti, there is a very good possibility he may fit the profile.

Having said all this, no one can be sure. May be a 1,000 years from now, if
no one knows about Krishnamurti or his writings/speeches, then we can
dismiss him. If on the other hand his philosophy flourishes at that time,
then it would be a corrobortive information.

However there are many who does not think that he does not fit the profile.
So this argument may go on for many years to come.

The above is just my view. Others mileage and direction may vary.

mkr