U L T book speaks out on W Judge & dead Blavatsky/K Tingley & deceased Judge
Feb 27, 1998 08:41 PM
by David Green
Jerry Hejka-Ekins <jjhe@netfeed.com> wrote--------
>So, I believe that this ends our business, except to respond to your
>persistent criticism about my comment on the Jan. 1895 letter, where I
said
>that all ES communications during this time frame came from England,
and
>that I had no record of an ES communication for the date you gave.
This is
>just one more example of your not giving complete enough information
upon
>which to make an accurate comment. I asked you to give a complete
citing so
>that we can put the document in context. In your next communication
you
>cited the Nov. 1932 O.E. Literary critic as your source. When I looked
up
>your reference, I found that the E.S. communication in question was
actually
>sent out a year later than the date you gave in your initial post. So
that
>explains my confusion over the European verses the American return
>address. You give me wrong information, I give you wrong answers. It
is
>that simple.
JHE---------
What info wrong?
Which E S communication
actually sent out a year
later than the date
given by me?
Are you pointing to W
Judge Janu 5 1895
letter to A Keightley?
What date do you assign
it?
What is basis for your
correction?
Clarification requested.
I think your confused.
D Green
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
[Back to Top]
Theosophy World:
Dedicated to the Theosophical Philosophy and its Practical Application
