Theos-Talk Archives (January 1998 Message tt00197)

At 12:25 PM 1/18/1998 -0800, you wrote:
>M K Ramadoss wrote:
>
>> At 05:57 AM 1/18/1998 -0800, you wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> >M K Ramadoss wrote:
>> >
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> BTW, this is the second time I hear of Gomes on the Internet. On
theos-l,
>> >> there was a info posted by a subscriber as coming from Gomes on certain
>> >> details of Krishnamurti litigation matter. I did not think that the info
>> >> was correct. Hence I inquired with the msg poster and Gomes was
supposed to
>> >> check the details and let the poster know. In spite of my public
follow-up
>> >> with the poster, that was the last I heard on this matter.
>> >>
>> >> I hope this clarifies where I am coming from on this issue.
>> >>
>> >> MKRamadoss
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> >  Who was the subscriber?
>> >
>> >JJHE
>>
>> I would rather not go into it and leave the matter at that.
>>
>> mkr
>>
>
>Fine.  My observation however is that we have two different situations
here.  In
>my case I was offering first hand *my* opinion.  In the case you bring up,
you
>were offered second hand Mr. Gomes opinion.  I think we can agree that
second hand
>information is always suspect anyway.  Right?
>
>JJHE

You are right about the differences in the two situations. However,
considering the credibility of the person who posted the info, I did not
suspect it. I thought it was wrong and wanted to find out where the info
was obtained from. I don't mind about errors so long as they are recognized
as such and corrected without delay.

mkr