Theos-Talk Archives (January 1998 Message tt00191)

M K Ramadoss wrote:

> At 05:57 AM 1/18/1998 -0800, you wrote:
> >
> >
> >M K Ramadoss wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> BTW, this is the second time I hear of Gomes on the Internet. On theos-l,
> >> there was a info posted by a subscriber as coming from Gomes on certain
> >> details of Krishnamurti litigation matter. I did not think that the info
> >> was correct. Hence I inquired with the msg poster and Gomes was supposed to
> >> check the details and let the poster know. In spite of my public follow-up
> >> with the poster, that was the last I heard on this matter.
> >>
> >> I hope this clarifies where I am coming from on this issue.
> >>
> >> MKRamadoss
> >>
> >>
> >
> >  Who was the subscriber?
> >
> >JJHE
>
> I would rather not go into it and leave the matter at that.
>
> mkr
>

Fine.  My observation however is that we have two different situations here.  In
my case I was offering first hand *my* opinion.  In the case you bring up, you
were offered second hand Mr. Gomes opinion.  I think we can agree that second hand
information is always suspect anyway.  Right?

JJHE