Theos-Talk Archives (July 1997 Message tt00072)

One this answer and view concenring the races/sub-races.

Perhaps we could also consider that this arrangement showing
cycles and sub-cycles of progress correcpond colosely to the 7
principles prenst in uss all the time, but, one might be
emphsized over the others in any one incarnations, or een,during
any one incarnation, at a specific period of life.

For example: I read what Brenda writes.  I choose Manas to think
it over, and then employ the store-house of memory to review
statements in Theosophy concerning race developoment and
evolutions in general.  By analogy I can then think of any
division as correspondindg specifically to one of my
"principles", either in dormancy, or in activity.

What makes a "principle" active ? Is it not making use of it ?
What in us does the selection ? What in us is aware of the whole
range of these interior powers ? Is it not the PERCEIVER ? And
does the Perceiver not emply the WILL to make a selected use,
orto active one of its own aspects so that greater clarity uis
achieved.

I think we would err if we concsidered that we conn not access
anyprinciple on demand.  We are called the "7-Principled-Dhyan."
We have to think of ourselves as a Unity of Units, as One of the
Many s[iritual Unites that compose on the plane of the ATMA the
great UNITY OF ALL UNITES.  There we are ONE at all times, but
when we concisder ourselves as living and manifesting in our
present bodies and environment, we tend to isolate ourselves from
that REALITY.

This is an idea to be considered -- Dallas