Re: theos-talk (unknown)
May 22, 2012 09:02 AM
by M. Sufilight
Dear Ramanujachary and friends
My views are:
Ramanujachary wrote:
Shall I say, presented by Madame Blavatsky, on behalf of her Teachers who guide the course of evolution and help the advancement of human thought.
M. Sufilight says:
I take this as a response to my previous post to you...
I will politely have to disagree with you on you to me - somewhat - sectarian view...
Allow me to ask:
Why were the Constitution of the Theosophical Society year 1875 and even year 1890, when Blavatsky was livning saying something different?
And why was Blavatsky when she lived saying something else?
CONSTITUTION AND RULES OF THE THEOSOPHICAL SOCIETY
"ARTICLE I"
.......
The Theosophical Society is absolutely unsectarian"
.......
"ARTICLE XIII
Offences
1. Any Fellow who shall in any way attempt to involve the Society In political disputes shall be immediately expelled.
2. No Fellow, Officer, or Council of the Theosophical Society, or of any Section or Branch thereof, shall promulgate or maintain any doctrines being that advanced, or advocated by the Society.
http://www.teozofija.info/tsmembers/Rules_1890.htm
Why did they - at all - write this into the Constitution of the Theosophical Society if they meant something else, with the objects of the Society and how to promulagte altruism, - and that, as much as 15 years after the beginning of the existence of the Society?
Do you really think Blavatsky against these formulations?
M. Sufilight
---- Original Message -----
From: Ramanujachary
To: theos-talk@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2012 10:27 AM
Subject: theos-talk (unknown)
From: "Ramanujachary nallanchakravarti"<srivirinchi@Z9OAqrPd9Vpc1LXrwajNQza5w96DNkpgRxqwsdokP4gfjqmCosSX82waO1jZGvdoH0gbezxDKO8lLgk1TnFF9w.yahoo.invalid> Tue, 22 May '12 5:59a
To: "theos-talk@yahoogroups.com"<theos-talk@yahoogroups.com>
Show full Headers | View blocked images
Shall I say, presented by Madame Blavatsky, on behalf of her Teachers who guide the course of evolution and help the advancement of human thought.
I'm sorry, words are always deceptive and inadequate, yet we have to use them. They do not mean the same, convey the equal spirit to everybody, Unfortunately, when 'subjective' factors are brought into 'concrete' concepts and ideas,and not altruistic actions this difficulty comes up. Needs to be resolved in patience and understanding.
Thank you for your response.
Dr Ramanujachary
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
- References:
- [no subject]
- From: "Ramanujachary" <srivirinchi@3F3PEv0CQuhKH8IzMx67ee0sUXemJlE-EKUjilyiYAASekcJcLmpV60AVNXAtF2eR-YZpEaLMxPFrb6xMxzK.yahoo.invalid>
[Back to Top]
Theosophy World:
Dedicated to the Theosophical Philosophy and its Practical Application