Theos-Talk Archives (January 2012 Message tt00002)

I have often wondered what "Truth is a pathless land' really means!
Cass



>________________________________
> From: MKR <mkr777@QEsMOh7DL_6Avv3etTnYpsu8DyNtM6Z95NfxBAByxizJn1M8Jpx6k8gbtBSOm_Ta5Q2UuRWU9Q.yahoo.invalid>
>To: theos-talk@yahoogroups.com 
>Sent: Sunday, 1 January 2012 5:16 AM
>Subject: Re: theos-talk On Alice Bailey and Blavatsky
> 
>
>Â 
>In the final analysis, IMHO, what is important is the conclusions each one
>of us come to. Truth is a pathless land.
>
>On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 10:25 AM, proto37 <hozro@ehPs-IxKaYTyyQO07vuqshHVP06IRpwh0sKcGMz7sM9N38ly9I9LrRNSluo2VqzgA0cUIc0P2fFpGpc.yahoo.invalid> wrote:
>
>> **
>>
>>
>> On Alice Bailey and Blavatsky
>>
>> Here is a link to a critical study on Alice Bailey's writings, or
>> mediumship, by Victor Endersby, and Why Bailey is NOT "the same as
>> Blavatsky," or the same as Theosophy. 'One of the "sects" sufilight refers
>> to. So many jumped on Blavatsky's shirt-tails, and now, in the Night-time
>> of the spiritual cycles, long after the "the last-quarter effort," they
>> become more predominant, like other night-creatures.
>>
>> >http://www.scribd.com/doc/37333476/A-Critique-of-Alice-Bailey-Endersby<
>>
>> "Ninety-nine percent of all spiritual communications are prima facie
>> false." Mahatma Letters (paraphrase)
>>
>> 
>>
>
>[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
> 
>
>

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]