Theos-Talk Archives (December 2011 Message tt00100)

In the final analysis, IMHO, what is important is the conclusions each one
of us come to. Truth is a pathless land.

On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 10:25 AM, proto37 <hozro@33H97cW-dtVFVR7lHJ8hPuIJuiNtmpxat61KUBaqe7OTp2EbMWCLBdoY3JtxtEvmgJFQzYjIcjTTIi4.yahoo.invalid> wrote:

> **
>
>
> On Alice Bailey and Blavatsky
>
> Here is a link to a critical study on Alice Bailey's writings, or
> mediumship, by Victor Endersby, and Why Bailey is NOT "the same as
> Blavatsky," or the same as Theosophy. 'One of the "sects" sufilight refers
> to. So many jumped on Blavatsky's shirt-tails, and now, in the Night-time
> of the spiritual cycles, long after the "the last-quarter effort," they
> become more predominant, like other night-creatures.
>
> >http://www.scribd.com/doc/37333476/A-Critique-of-Alice-Bailey-Endersby<
>
> "Ninety-nine percent of all spiritual communications are prima facie
> false." Mahatma Letters (paraphrase)
>
>  
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]