Theos-Talk Archives (April 2011 Message tt00094)

Thanks for the clarification. Knowing pretty well the reputation of
Solovyov, one wonders why it was included.

MKR

On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 8:31 PM, chandrasekaryas <
chandrasekaryas@jfSzwgriVVjOaeGEcaztlCTpBFHjVrn-mJWaKdH9JUoSzOQY9R3q9foPbjg4Tqiye0_0Zmb_ebTjgOo_KaC6TuZSV_0.yahoo.invalid> wrote:

>
>
> Congratulations jdm.
>
> Unfortunately the good book Letters of HP Blavatsky (Vol I) by Algeo
> include controversial letters from Solovyov's pen.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Chan
>
> --- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, "jdmsoares" <jdmsoares@...> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Dear friends,
> >
> > We have published in our websites a most interesting text by
> > H.P.Blavatsky, where she does not hesitate to denounce the biased,
> > dishonest and unfounded comments made by Vladimir Solovyov.
> >
> > In the answering to Solovyov she also clarifies what are the true
> > sources of Theosophy.
> >
> > The text title is:
> >
> > An Answer to a Russian Philosopher
> >
> > On the Eastern Sources of Modern Theosophy
> >
> > The direct links are http://www.theosophyonline.com/ler.php?id=223
> > <http://www.theosophyonline.com/ler.php?id=223> and
> >
> http://www.esoteric-philosophy.com/2011/04/answer-to-russian-philosopher\
>  <http://www.esoteric-philosophy.com/2011/04/answer-to-russian-philosopher>>
> .html
> > <
> http://www.esoteric-philosophy.com/2011/04/answer-to-russian-philosophe\
>  <http://www.esoteric-philosophy.com/2011/04/answer-to-russian-philosophe>>
> r.html> .
> >
> >
> >
> > Best regards, Joaquim
> >
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
>
>  
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]