Theos-Talk Archives (April 2011 Message tt00085)

Dear friends,

I am happy to see a free debate develop on the issue of Justice to Judge
and on the excellent book by Pelletier. We believe every side of truth
must be examined.  The debate itself demonstrates the central importance
of WQJ's life and work have to the theosophical movement.



Best regards, Joaquim



--- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, MKR <mkr777@...> wrote:
>
> Thanks for the good work you are doing.
>
> Still, from a personal perspective, I would like to read Pelletier's
book as
> he had put in a lot of work in it. It is voluminous, but getting info
> firsthand from it allows one to come to their own conclusions. The
book is
> very pricey costing $95 plus shipping. Which makes it almost out of
reach
> for theosophists in developing countries.
>
> The only way to quickly and easily make it available is to upload a
pdf file
> on to Internet so that anyone can download it for free. The market for
the
> book is very narrow. So I wonder how many more books can be sold at
this
> price. Obviously the point in producing the book is to educate
theosophists
> about the case. It can be best done and most effectively by making a
copy
> available as a pdf file. I have even offered to convert it as a pdf
file if
> a complimentary free copy is sent to me. Conversion can be done in a
day and
> the book will be searchable.
>
> Let us hope everyone interested in the case contacts Pelletier and
convince
> him that making the pdf file available for free is the best thing that
can
> be done to Judge at this time.
>
> MKR
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 2:08 AM, Daniel danielhcaldwell@... wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > On the webpage listed below, I have tried to give some
> > of my observations concerning the book titled THE JUDGE
> > CASE.
> >
> > http://blavatskyarchives.com/pelletier_judge_case.htm
> >
> > I have more notes and observations but I need to
> > collate them and will do that as soon as I can.
> >
> > Daniel
> > http://hpb.cc
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]