Theos-Talk Archives (March 2011 Message tt00173)

Well said and I agree.
One reason I posted the message was because the article contained some
recent information about the matters that took place in TS (Adyar) and hence
thought some readers here may be of interest.

On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 3:02 AM, Konstantin Zaitzev <kay_ziatz@XXh3bncxOr5mhHthLo7lxg0aOMH6289KWKGtQ4IqH7AgzJWbUgVuyvhn4nBsgYrSKk4RWPCKdU0TXg.yahoo.invalid>wrote:

>
>
> > Some months ago, an article on the topic of the Future of Adyar
> > Society was published in a theosophical forum.
>
> The author is very prejudiced. He persistently calls theosophical society
> "Adyar society", ignoring the fact that other societies calling themselves
> theosophical are decaying in much greater degree and hadn't much prominence
> even in their best times.
> Information on his site is filtered and censored. Several months ago he
> proposed me to make an interview, ensuring me in his "professional
> journalism", "professional ethics" and other bla-bla-bla like that.
> It took much time to write detailed answers to all his questions, but as
> some my answers proved to be not like he expected, he declined to publish
> the interview.
> I agree that for the last 30 years the Theosophical Society is experiencing
> serious problems (probably more serious than the author points out but of
> quite different nature), but it's not the best way to solve them to resort
> to the help of the enemies of the Society. For many years he was a member
> and later left it, and, as HPB pointed out, such people form the most bitter
> enemies. The other materials of the site illustarate that well.
>
>  
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]