Theos-Talk Archives (March 2011 Message tt00110)

Dear Konstantin and friends

My views are:

What is assumed to be Criticism, is instead an attempt to help, and is merely a pointing out of a certain problems seen, so to alleviate suffering - and so that the Theosophical Society might improve it self. But if the Theosophical Society and its members have become so secterian, that they disallow another point of view seeking to promote the motto of the Society: THERE IS NO RELIGION HIGHER THAN THE TRUTH, then it is of course their choice.

My view is, that If ones - conscience - is allright, one will have no problem with reading my posts where I merely are expressing my views; views which honestly are wellmeaning, and by no means meant in a negative manner.. My views have in fact all of them been written, so to make people aware of what altruism really is, and what it is not. 

But, those who dislike what I write, not seldom assumes that I have different motvies. But assumptions based on insufficent premises are not the same as the truth. And those who dislike what I write, might do well in evaulating whether it is they themselves who have misunderstood something.


Again these are just my views.

- - -
So what do you have to offer so to show that I have misunderstood it all, which you so openly (altruisticly I hope) asserts without telling me why?

What is it I have misunderstood?



M. Sufilight


  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Konstantin Zaitzev 
  To: theos-talk@yahoogroups.com 
  Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2011 9:25 PM
  Subject: Re: theos-talk Update on GC Meeting Minutes


    

  --- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, "M. Sufilight" <global-theosophy@...> wrote:

  > But maybe I have misunderstood it all?

  Surely yes. You do nothing but criticizing.
  Preaching "altruism", especially in such intolerant manner, is not altruism at all.



  

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]