Theos-Talk Archives (December 2010 Message tt00258)

Absolutely.  

Just remember that as an author copyrights/publishes that new book is now (c) - sometimes, it actually just goes on a lot like a game of relay - new editions, the next editions, so on.

Current copyrights, really, you'd want to deal with the authors (aka talent) and publishers (rights; permissions and terms) to be rite a/b I don't see why authors and publishers wouldn't be interested in new avenues; a good retool for the internet is important progress, I agree.  A good schema that'd work, I think the industry (authors and publishers) would happily adapt AND certainly are looking for that.

They could do so many things.  

Myself, I'd love it if TS in particular, did an online library/book center (something along the lines of Open Campus meets Netflicks) that really gave free and organized access to a thorough and serious collection of various arcane categories (studies/fields) - then, if I could just join their book of the month club, list my favorites, and have them send me hmmm the best Art Symbology books periodically (check out/check in, perhaps) man, that'd be sweet - not quite full service but improving for sure.  You know, doing stuff - access, distribution, choices (resources) and services. 

And what ever happened to art symbology (introductory a/o advanced) anyways, and if people don't study that how will they be able to recognize, decipher or cue the subtle nature most often written within the heiroglyphics themselves.     

So many interesting subjects that enrich and enhance peoples' lives/skills.  


--- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, MKR <mkr777@...> wrote:
>
> Problem is not for me. I can find a work around. The question is for the
> welfare of all theosophists.
> 


--- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, MKR <mkr777@...> wrote:
>
> Problem is not for me. I can find a work around. The question is for the
> welfare of all theosophists.
> 
> On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 12:22 PM, thalprin <thalprin@...> wrote:
> 
> >
> >
> > If there's a general consensus that there's a problem today with the
> > distribution a/o accessability of early materials I'd tend to think that the
> > Society's founders wouldn't had forsight about that and/and so you probably
> > already have a working solution they've provided for you, you just haven't
> > seen or noticed it yet - that'd be my opinion.
> >
> > Terrie
> >
> >  
> >
> 
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>