Theos-Talk Archives (December 2010 Message tt00012)

I have also not seen any of the messages you are referring to.

Would you mind reposting them to theos-talk with a copy to my email address
- mkr777_at_gmail.com so that I can make sure they get posted.

MKR

On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 5:05 PM, <Augoeides-222@uyIIxsuA2PO16A-SGdmvkfImRtayKz8aQdVvwzsciTEYoR8KqJvQrwtw_Wzm3pil-RwdwXzTLtqwVjSyE6mS0GHrVNo.yahoo.invalid> wrote:

>
>
> Daniel,
> Well I guess this might be why the three replies I posted to this Forum
> have not appeared so far, i was marking it up to holiday causes. I had
> applauded the Commentaries having been placed on-line as well as some other
> neat documents I noticed in addition what a crying shame we don't even get
> the courtesy of an off forum e-mail to explain what ever necessity was
> presented, just the black abyss of posts that go to oblivion without simple
> notice of the why.
>
> Because of the Commentary's I did considerable on-line searching and was
> given new knowledge which I also posted in one of the lost posts from
> November 23 to 27th
> to this Forum which I felt would benefit others. Included was my notice
> about the Adyar Library Bulletin's that I found on-line which could be
> purchased from 45 on up depending on the assessed contents by the sellers.
> My logic was perhaps if interested party's subscribed, they might then have
> access to the Archives of the Bulletin that goes way back and maybe some of
> those desired Documents that can never seem to be found would be listed and
> published in the Bulletin.
>
> I really wish a pleasant explanation would appear from mkr soon, and also
> the ISIS holders should tell all of us the true legal ground that exists in
> regards to the Documents they had on the website as I have no interest
> whatever to possess anything the violates a legal copyright held by anyone,
> and I am sure that is the view of most members of this Forum!
>
> Regards John
>
> -----
> From: "Daniel" < danielhcaldwell @yahoo.com>
> To: theos-talk@ yahoogroups .com
> Sent: Wednesday, December 1, 2010 1:01:13 PM
> Subject: theos-talk Re: The SECRET DOCTRINE COMMENTARIES Online
>
> Thanks for your remarks, MKR .
>
> The custodian of the original manuscript is The Theosophy Company [of the
> United Lodge of Theosophists] Los Angeles .
>
> You and other interested readers should write directly to the Theosophy
> Company and even to each individual member of the Board of directors for the
> Theosophy Company registering your complaint and concerns and encouraging
> them to do exactly what you have been advocating for some time.
>
> A few months ago I wrote to the Theosophy Company about this.
>
> It is also interesting to read what was recently posted at BLAVATSKY NEWS,
> according to what I have been told this is a blog maintained by a well-known
> Theosophical researcher.
>
> Here is the relevant posting:
> http :// blavatskynews . blogspot .com/2010/11/maya-of-imri. html
>
> I think one of the statements in this posting is made with you [ MKR ] in
> mind. I could be wrong but I don't think so.
>
> Daniel Caldwell
> http :// hpb .cc
>
> --- In theos-talk@ yahoogroups .com , MKR <mkr777@...> wrote:
> >
> > It is highly likely that ISIS might have asked the site to remove the
> > material since it is copyrighted. This is how publishers respond to
> Internet
> > uploads of items such as music, videos, and movies. Recently US
> Governmental
> > Agencies have shut down several sites which facilitated distribution of
> > copyrighted materials and the Internet community is currently developing
> > techniques and infrastructure to defeat such action in the future.
> Googling
> > will provide a wealth of info on this.
> >
> > ISIS, quite possibly, want to continue to sell their very pricey book to
> > those who can afford them. Obviously, they seem not interested in making
> the
> > material reach as many theosophists as possible. HPB would be turning in
> her
> > grave in London seeing what Kali Yuga theosophists are doing to their
> > brethren.
> >
> > If the current custodians want the commentary material to be widely
> > distributed to theosophists, (who else has any interested in it), all
> they
> > have to do is to have the originals scanned and uploaded to Internet. Why
> it
> > has not been done so, I do not know.
> >
> > Once scanned material is uploaded to Internet, many theosophists around
> the
> > world can collaboratively discuss and comment in Wiki type approach. We
> > should bear in mind there are very many knowledgeable theosophists around
>
> > the world who are more qualified to discuss the commentaries and it would
> be
> > a boon to theosophy world.
> >
> > Let us wait and see what is the next move of ISIS and the current
> custodians
> > of the originals.
> >
> > MKR
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 2:18 PM, Daniel < danielhcaldwell @...> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Today if you go to the link below, you will find this message:
> > >
> > > "This content was removed at the request of ISIS."
> > >
> > > So what happened? And what is the story behind this new development?
> > >
> > > Daniel
> > > http :// hpb .cc
> > >
> > > --- In theos-talk@ yahoogroups .com <theos-talk%40yahoogroups.com>,
> > > " jdmsoares " < jdmsoares @> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Dear friends,
> > > >
> > > > Thanks to Theosophy Watch < http :// theosophywatch .com/ > now all
> the
> > > > students can have freely access to "THE SECRET DOCTRINE COMMENTARIES
> > > > Ãâ" The Unpublished 1889 Instructions".
> > > >
> > > > They are published online at:
> > > >
> > > > http :// www . scribd
> .com/doc/43546245/The-Secret-Doctrine-Commentaries
> > > > < http :// www . scribd
> .com/doc/43546245/The-Secret-Doctrine-Commentaries >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Best regards,
> > > >
> > > > Joaquim
> > > >
> > > > 0000000000000000000000
> > > >
> > > > Always visit www .esoteric-philosophy.com
> > > > < http :// www .esoteric-philosophy.com/ >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>  
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]