Theos-Talk Archives (October 2010 Message tt00056)

Ok, I thrw in a few as well...

As MKR has already mentioned many times about the availability of the Internet, 
the Theosophical Society should become a complete digital one. The Digital 
Theosophical Society would not have the trouble of maintaining Staff nor 
property and as such is much more in line with the being free of the Knowledge 
the TS could share through this medium. 

Adapting to reading from a screen instead of parts of a dead tree is easy. Glass 
is made of sand and sand carries Akasha. Illuminated Akasha...ok,ok I go too 
much off topic.
I would support the idea of the founding of a Digital Theosophical Society and 
include the Theosophical site of Joe Fulton, since I feel people there are much 
more open to new developements than anywhere else online.
Fulton''s site can be found here: http://theosnet.ning.com/
Although I myself am banned overthere because of my mental temper, that doesn't 
mean I do not support them...




________________________________
From: M. Sufilight <global-theosophy@5LifRzY74YUIa7DcziJOBj1WNSOb7MWn8n4V8GiYqFehRdKLuxZkWEhvjXZn95QJlZyrKFVwxHiS-myVJBKOZnUSnA.yahoo.invalid>
To: theos-talk@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sat, October 9, 2010 11:27:44 AM
Subject: Re: theos-talk Aurobindo's madman?

  
May I throw a few words?

CONSTITUTION AND RULES OF THE THEOSOPHICAL SOCIETY, The Theosophist - January 
1891 says the following in Article XIII:

"ARTICLE XIII
Offences"
.......
"2. No Fellow, Officer, or Council of the Theosophical Society, or of any 
Section or Branch thereof, shall promulgate or maintain any doctrinas being that 
advanced, or advocated by the Society."
http://www.global-theosophy.net/ts_constitution_rules.php
or
The Theosophist May 1891 to September 1891 (for instance the Kessinger version)

So why should one follow the views given by Aurobindo if one keep this 
Constitution in mind and Blavatsky words in [âORIGINAL PROGRAMMEâ MANUSCRIPT] 
(BCW, Vol. VII, p. 145-173)
http://www.katinkahesselink.net/blavatsky/articles/v7/yxxxx_019.htm ?

M. Sufilight 

----- Original Message ----- 
From: Duane Carpenter 
To: theos-talk@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Saturday, October 09, 2010 11:01 AM
Subject: Re: theos-talk Aurobindo's madman?

Great Article Jim
This extracted section of the article really gave important insights.

Aurobindo: Claims of Theosophy

"If Theosophy is to survive, it must first change itself. It must learn that 
mental rectitude to which it is now a stranger and improve its moral basis. It 
must become clear, straightforward, rigidly self-searching, sceptical in the 
nobler sense of the word. It must keep the Mahatmas in the background and put 
God and Truth in the front. Its Popes must dethrone themselves and enthrone the 
intellectual conscience of mankind. If they wish to be mystic and secret like 
our Yogins, then they must like our Yogins assert only to the initiate and the 
trained; but if they come out into the world to proclaim their mystic truths 
aloud and seek power, credit and influence on the strength of their assertions, 
then they must prove. It need not and ought not to be suddenly or by miracles; 
but there must be a scientific development, we must be able to lay hold on the 
rationale and watch the process of the truths they proclaim." 

Circa 1910/12

________________________________
From: jamesbergh <jamesbergh@xvQDImbtg7W-WC0616us3smwhB8r_WZMZVa0TWsyQw3mYhpTccpRCQlSdIjOeQnEj4G9FNQlHaqQBXmwSLU.yahoo.invalid>
To: theos-talk@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Fri, October 8, 2010 7:12:33 PM
Subject: theos-talk Aurobindo's madman?

I was reading an article by Aurobindo, Claims of Theosophy at:
www.aurobindo.ru/workings/sa/17/0015_e.htm

He wrote in 1910/12: ...The only member of the Theosophical Society who could 
give me any spiritual help I could not better by my unaided faculties, was one 
excluded from the esoteric section because of his rare and potent experiences 
were unintelligible to Theosophical guides... one who meddled not in 
organizations and election cabals but lived like a madman, unmattavat."

Could have been some other Chuck, but I wonder who this soul may have been.

Any ideas?

Jim

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


 


      

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]