Theos-Talk Archives (February 2010 Message tt00287)

I will allow myself to ask:
Why was Radha Burnier in need for various Doctor's opinions?
Was there any documentation forwarded speaking against her health which made such a need important?
And was these opinions by the Doctor's ever documented?
If so are any these possible documentations officially available?
Can we rely on mere assumptions and hearsay?

And is all the situation not just a dramatized farce?



M. Sufilight

  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: anton_rozman 
  To: theos-talk@yahoogroups.com 
  Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2010 7:59 PM
  Subject: Re: Theos-World New Information re: Radha BurnierÃââs health in Dec 2007


    
  Dear Ramadoss,

  For the sake of correctness of facts:

  - Dr. Zagar is a man, not a woman.
  - Dr. Zagar is a neuropsychiatrist.
  - Dr. Zagar never examined Mrs. Radha Burnier by himself but formed his opinion on the basis of medical examinations made by local doctors.
  - Dr. Zagar is a fervent Mrs. Radha Burnier supporter.
  - Doctors' opinions were acquired for the needs of Mrs. Radha Burnier election campaign as reaction to publicly expressed doubts about her fitness for another term of office.

  Best regards,
  Anton

  --- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, MKR <mkr777@...> wrote:
  >
  > When I read the 2007 GC meeting Minutes, I was surprised to learn that Radha
  > Burnier's health was indeed discussed in the GC meeting. In addition, Dr.
  > Zagar was asked in the meeting by those present about her opinion on Radha's
  > health, since she is a physician. She confirmed that Radha Burnier is in
  > good health.
  > 
  > Neither of the above info was disclosed to voting members at the time of
  > electioneering.
  > 
  > I think it is the duty of the leaders to disclose all available information
  > to our brothers and sisters and members are intelligent to decide on the
  > credibility of the info and then vote accordingly.
  > 
  > Withholding the above, is indeed a disservice to the members and reduces the
  > credibility of the leaders in the minds of members.
  > 
  > MKR
  > 
  > 
  > 
  > On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 2:40 AM, Morten Nymann Olesen <
  > global-theosophy@...> wrote:
  > 
  > >
  > >
  > > Dear MKR
  > >
  > > Maybe we have covered this issue about Radha Burnier before. It is a bit
  > > hard to me to keep track with all the e-mails exchanged on the issue.
  > >
  > > Any answer to these questions without any documentation cannot be
  > > considered to be very helpful.
  > > Yet if more than say 20 Hindu members are able to give a testimony in
  > > opposition to Dr. Susan Zagar's views it might be worth while to consider
  > > the validity the realities.
  > >
  > > It is the duty of any member to defend the truth and not the duty to cloud
  > > the truth.
  > > There is no Religion Higher than Truth.
  > >
  > > -
  > >
  > 
  > 
  > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
  >



  

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]