Theos-Talk Archives (February 2010 Message tt00237)

Nah, the submarines got them off Atlantis!
Cass


>
>From: Martin <Mvandertak@yahoo.com>
>To: theos-talk@yahoogroups.com
>Sent: Wed, 17 February, 2010 3:03:52 AM
>Subject: Re: Theos-World Re: [bad text]
>
>Â 
>LOL, I can imagine one: "silently breakloose" :-)
>
>____________ _________ _________ __
>From: "Drpsionic@aol. com" <Drpsionic@aol. com>
>To: theos-talk@yahoogro ups.com
>Sent: Tue, February 16, 2010 4:58:50 PM
>Subject: Re: Theos-World Re: [bad text]
>
>Well, if there really had been an Atlantis and not just some figment of 
>Plato's weird imagination. ..
>
>But hell, maybe the Mayans sank it with their atomic submarines which were 
>given to them by the space aliens who had nothing better to do with their 
>time.
>
>Now the big question, one which HPB often asked while laughing her head 
>off, "How many ridiculous things can Theosophists believe before breakfast?"
>
>Chuck the Heretic
>
>_www.charlescosiman o.com 
>
>In a message dated 2/15/2010 7:15:25 P.M. Central Standard Time, 
>silva_cass@yahoo. com writes:
>
>I hope its not going to take another Atlantis sinking before we realise 
>that the times they are a changin.
>
>Cass
>
>>
>>From: "
>
>_ (http://www.charlesc osimano.com/) _Augoeides-222@ Augoeides- 2_ 
>(mailto:Augoeides-222@ comcast.net) _" <_ (http://www.charlesc osimano.com/) 
>_Augoeides-222@ Augoeides- 2_ (mailto:Augoeides-222@ comcast.net) _>
>>To: _ (http://www.charlesc osimano.com/) _theos-talk@ yahoogrotheos- t_ 
>(mailto:theos-talk@yahoogro ups.com) 
>>Sent: Tue, 16 February, 2010 11:52:38 AM
>>Subject: Re: Theos-World Re: [bad text]
>>
>> 
>>Cass, 
>>CNN is a lot younger than I am lol. One of the main anchors on CNN once 
>said "Saudi Arabia doesn't even have an Army!" Lol. That was when Saudi 
>Arabia was the only buyer who saved the production of the US Abrams-II Tank by 
>buying it. The Pentagon didnt want to buy the now more capable version. And 
>If I remember there was earlier years where snow fall also covered at 
>least 48 states twice in the 20th century. 
>>Regards, 
>>John 
>>----- Original Message ----- 
>>From: "Cass Silva" <silva_cass@ silva_cass> 
>>To: theos-talk@yahoogro ups.com 
>>Sent: Monday, February 15, 2010 3:51:58 PM GMT -08:00 US/Canada Pacific 
>>Subject: Re: Theos-World Re: [bad text] 
>>
>>According to CNN there is no recorded evidence that this has happened in 
>the past. 
>>> 
>>>Cass 
>>> 
>>>From: " Augoeides-222@ comcast.net " < Augoeides-222@ comcast.net > 
>>>To: theos-talk@yahoogro ups.com 
>>>Sent: Tue, 16 February, 2010 10:46:35 AM 
>>>Subject: Re: Theos-World Re: [bad text] 
>>> 
>>> 
>>>Chuck, 
>>>Yep, 26 beow zero icy frozen everything, and that wonderful 50 mph 
>breeze blowing acroos thge 1/2 mile of ice on the shore of Lake Michigan begin 
>reaching any of us chicagoans lol!!! Sbow was higher than I was when I was 
>kid in Chicago. We used to grab a ride and shoe surf on the ice by holding 
>onto the back bumpers of the cars ! Wheee what fun!!! And the MONSTER summer 
>electrical storms amde my mom disappear because she was hiding in the 
>closet. And it was estatic to wake up drenched with wet sheets in the hot 
>summer time of Chicago. I also said "Whats the big deal?" we had snow like that 
>every year back on the 40-50's! 
>>> 
>>>John 
>>>----- Original Message ----- 
>>>From: Drpsionic@aol. com 
>>>To: theos-talk@yahoogro ups.com 
>>>Sent: Monday, February 15, 2010 8:14:59 AM GMT -08:00 US/Canada Pacific 
>>>Subject: Re: Theos-World Re: [bad text] 
>>> 
>>>LOL! 
>>> 
>>>I can remember a number of years where 95% of the US was under snow and 
>>>cold so bad it froze the oil in car engines. This year is nothing. Oh 
>the 
>>>East Coast had a snow storm and the southerners got to make snowmen, but 
>I'm 
>>>from Chicago, I live in Wisconsin and you ain't gonna impress me with 
>snow. 
>>> 
>>>As far as the planets being aligned with the Milky Way, the planets are 
>>>always aligned with something. The Mayans were simply nuts, or is it the 
>>>folks who are taking them seriously who are nuts? Sorry, I'm not 
>impressed. 
>>> 
>>>Chuck the Heretic 
>>> 
>>>www.charlescosima www.charlesco
>>> 
>>>In a message dated 2/14/2010 7:35:43 P.M. Central Standard Time, 
>>>silva_cass@ yahoo. com writes: 
>>> 
>>>Hi Chuck 
>>>Seeing we have no recorded evidence of all the planets being in 
>alignment 
>>>with the Milky Way (which is all the Mayans predicted) we have no way of 
>>>knowing what, or cannot predict, how or if this event will impact the 
>earth. 
>>>We have had pole shifts in the past and survived them, we have had ice 
>and 
>>>mini ice ages, so what I am saying, is not that the earth will be 
>>>annihlated but what is causing these climatic changes such as 95 percent 
>of the USA 
>>>under snow? 
>>> 
>>>We have evidence of islands sinking and evidence of mountains 
>reemerging, 
>>>and if a chamber was found in the sphinx foot it would suggest that it 
>was 
>>>constructed to hold something which could have been removed. As Cayce 
>was 
>>>a christian perhaps the Jesus thing was more about the Christos thing.? 
>>> 
>>>Are there no more clairvoyants left in the TS? 
>>> 
>>>Cass 
>>> 
>>>In AgnosticsRefuge@ yahoogroups. com, "HumanCarol" <humanist@> wrote: 
>>>> > 
>>>> > Unable to correctly attribute material to the correct author, 
>>>mangummurdock <no_reply@> alleged: 
>>>> > 
>>>> > > Richard Dawkins argues in Chap 3 of his book "The Dawkins 
>Delusion" 
>>>that>> 
>>>> > 
>>>> > It is already know that that is a lie. 
>>>> > 
>>>> > << "it is more parsimonious to conjure up, say, a `Big Bang 
>>>singularity' or some other physical concept as yet unknown" to account 
>for the 
>>>existence of the universe. The word parsimonious is meaningless in 
>context: 
>>>Whatever it might denote, how could it be measured? But conjure is the 
>right 
>>>verb, suggesting as it does both misdirection and inattention. 
>Misdirection: 
>>>The Big Bang singularity does not represent a physical concept, because 
>it 
>>>cannot be accommodated by a physical theory. It is a point at which 
>physical 
>>>theories give way. Inattention: The physical concept in which Dawkins 
>has 
>>>placed his confidence is something that is either infinite and 
>inscrutable, 
>>>or otherwise unknown. Men have come to faith on the basis of far les_s. 
>>>This is, I suppose, not surprising. His atheism notwithstanding, Dawkins 
>>>believes that he is a "deeply religious man." He simply prefers an alien 
>cult.>> 
>>>> > 
>>>> > Why don't you correctly attribute that passage? 
>>>> > 
>>>> > Here is the context and a correct citation: 
>>>> > 
>>>> > ---begin excerpt--- 
>>>> > 
>>>> > > > 
>>>> 
>>> 
>>>[Non-text portions of this message hav_e been removed] 
>>> 
>>>[Non-text portions of this message have been removed] 
>>> 
>>>[Non-text portions of this message have been removed] 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>
>>___________ _________ __<WBR>_ _________ _________ _________ _________ 
>>Yahoo!7: Catch-up on your favourite Channel 7 TV shows easily, legally, 
>and for free at PLUS7. www.tv.yahoo. com.au/plus7 
>>
>>[Non-text portions of this message have been removed] 
>>
>>[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>>
>>
>>
>
>[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>_ (http://www.charlesc osimano.com/) 
>
>[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>------------ --------- --------- ------
>
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>


      __________________________________________________________________________________
Yahoo!7: Catch-up on your favourite Channel 7 TV shows easily, legally, and for free at PLUS7. www.tv.yahoo.com.au/plus7

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]