Theos-Talk Archives (February 2010 Message tt00035)

Honestly, it took me about 5/6 years just to figure this much out.  

Hopefully though the strong arm a/o 'storming the gates of' tactic has proved and proves unsatisfactory - however, persistance seems to be a guidebook notation, so, perhaps, in the future it will be most like field mice continually angling for the windows.  In that respect I'd guess that it may be a good idea to watch the corners and crevices as to their activities to gander their patterns.

Other than that, I'd suggest that not all people wear masks, or hopefully they don't - I'm a big fan of real.  

Also or finally, even now it is possible that those who are knowingly distorting Truth and reality could come to their senses and decide against promoting illusion and such vanity stances.



--- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, MKR <mkr777@...> wrote:
>
> We all have seen some very fine Masons and theosophists who are altruistic
> and best specimens of humanity. Such qualities have no correlation with the
> erudition, position held, how high they are in Masonry or theosophical
> organizations and any other attribute. We also have seen those in the other
> extreme, that may shock us.
> 
> We all wear a mask to present a favorable image in the world. However, when
> people are put in highly stressful and unusual situations, usually created
> by themselves, major breaks take place in the mask and people usually see
> the real person and usually those undesirable characteristics hidden behind
> the mask show up. When it happens, there is damage to the individual which
> is very difficult to fix. Those who come thru the rents in the mask smelling
> like a rose, have nothing to worry.
> 
> Let us see what is in store for TS in the near future. Are we seeing the
> calm before the storm?
> 
> MKR
> 
> 
> On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 8:12 PM, esapress@... <esapress@...>wrote:
> 
> >
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have been reading Theos-list posts of late, and sadly I do happen to
> > agree and via my own personal experience can confirm that indeed it does
> > look very much to me like Theosophy is being beseiged a/o as one might say
> > under attack. There are significant efforts being made to besmear Theosophy
> > and even perhaps derail it's original efforts and aims. Further, it does
> > look to me like it is coming most specifically or commonly from
> > organizations with a/o of Free Masonry. Myself knowing (and having known)
> > many fine Masons I am trying my best to keep things in perspective and to
> > not make sweeping a/o blanket statements about such Friends a/o
> > Organizations. I feel this/that sort of vague outlook will not specify the
> > exacts that people will need/want to seek out for a more thorough
> > understanding.
> >
> > As to why this should be, as yet I don't entirely know however I think that
> > it is partly a continuing and covert effort to privately, quietly, and
> > unlawfully obtain; and, clearly, I too feel it is a very sad thing to
> > see/know; and, of course, I'm still hoping that I'm wrong however as yet it
> > does not appear that I am.
> >
> > Sometimes, things that are important enough to stand your ground about are
> > also important enough for others to try and take if they can just manage to
> > figure out how. This/that issue (my best guess) however or ultimately is in
> > all likelyhood a ruse - it's simply an ego 'in' and efforting-means to
> > create friction, harrassment and continuing pressure to ultimately
> > discredit, dismantle a/o fracture the Org. - Obviously I too do happen to
> > think these are serious matters to keep track of -
> >
> > At any rate I can definitely confirm that there are in deed and in fact
> > specific people (caregivers of) working under illusion and covert who are
> > trying to not only conflict (and confine) each and everything Theosophy does
> > (and much worse) but additionally they are trying to misrespresent some
> > genuine Masons as having been other than. How/why it happened, specifically,
> > is it happening.
> >
> > First things first; it quite looks to me like it's all about
> > harrassing/impeding, discrediting and separating, so on, all those who
> > c/would pose real a/o strong opposition to such goings-ons.
> >
> > Terrie
> >
> >  
> >
> 
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>