Theos-Talk Archives (December 2009 Message tt00021)

We can Morten because we have no social or political impact to enlighten others of their corruption and evil manipulation in the world. It is those that are found hanging on Westminster Bridge that they are concerned about.

Cass


>
>From: Morten Nymann Olesen <global-theosophy@stofanet.dk>
>To: theos-talk@yahoogroups.com
>Sent: Sat, 5 December, 2009 11:24:29 AM
>Subject: Re: Theos-World Are the Jesuits inside the Vatican still at it?
>
>Â 
>I might add the following.
>
>H. P. Blavatsky said:
>"
>It is universally known that this most important object is to antagonize Christianity and especially Jesuitism. One of our most esteemed and valued members-once an ardent Spiritualist, but who must for the present be nameless-has but recently fallen a victim to the snares of this hateful body. The nefarious designs of Jesuitism are plotted in secret and carried out through secret agencies. What more reasonable and lawful, therefore, than that those who wish to fight it should keep their own secret, likewise, as to their agencies and plans? We have among us persons in high positions-political , military, financial and social-who regard Christianity as the greatest evil to humanity and are willing to help pull it down. But for them to be able to do much and well, they must do it anonymously. The church-"Triple- headed Snake," as a well-known writer calls it-can no longer burn its enemies, but it can blast their social influence; can no longer roast their
 bodies, but can ruin their fortunes. We have no right to give our enemy, the church, the names of our "Fellows" who are not ripe for martyrdom, and so we keep them secret. If we have an agent to send to India, or to Japan, or China, or any other heathen country, to do something or confer with somebody in connection with the Society's general plans against missionaries, it would be foolish, nay, criminal, to expose our agent to imprisonment under some malicious pretext, if not death, and even the latter is possible in the faraway East, and our scheme is liable to miscarry by announcing it to the dishonorable company of Jesus."
>http://www.katinkah esselink. net/blavatsky/ articles/ v1/y1878_ 031.htm
>
>But of course so who call themselves theosophists would like us to believe, that this was and is not a theosophical teaching today - because a new area has begun since the days of H. P. Blavatsky. - Yet, I see no reason not to mention, that I disagrees with these persons, and ask them why we aught not follow the above views?
>
>M. Sufilight
>
>----- Original Message ----- 
>From: Morten Nymann Olesen 
>To: theos-talk@yahoogro ups.com 
>Sent: Thursday, December 03, 2009 5:30 PM
>Subject: Theos-World Are the Jesuits inside the Vatican still at it?
>
>Dear friends
>
>My views are:
>
>One of my friends e-mailed this one on another forum. Try especially listen to the secend speaker in this video where Christopher Hitchens are telling something which aught to be carefully considered. At least that is what I think.
>
>The Catholic Church is a force for good in the world
>http://www.intellig encesquared. com/iq2-video/ 2009/catholic- church
>I do of course not agree on all what is said.
>But, ...any comments?
>
>- - -
>THEOSOPHY OR JESUITISM?
>http://www.blavatsk y.net/blavatsky/ arts/TheosophyOr Jesuitism. htm
>
>M. Sufilight
>
>[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>


      __________________________________________________________________________________
Win 1 of 4 Sony home entertainment packs thanks to Yahoo!7.
Enter now: http://au.docs.yahoo.com/homepageset/

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]