Theos-Talk Archives (November 2009 Message tt00132)

Dear friends

My views are:

Seeking to be of service I created this e-mail, which might be useful to some Seekers and potential Seekers after Truth.

I found the below to be a very good video.
And I can only recommend, that something similar being given out as a comparative study
with theosophy at theosophical groups. Of course one can say that there are some important minuses in the video, but its conent are - litterally speaking - pointing very much towards an Paradigmatic change with a tremendous impact looming in the horizon.

"Science and the taboo of psi" with Dean Radin (95 min.)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qw_O9Qiwqew

This video is stunning and must be a chock to watch for any ordinary Christian leader, leading scientists, politicians and especially leading journalists.

You can deny the truth, but it will not go away.
And there are more in the below links and words.

- - -
>From "The Conscious universe" by Dean Radin

"Chapter 1: Introduction
The psyche's attachment to the brain, i.e., its space-time limitation, is no longer as self-evident and incontrovertible as we have hitherto been led to believe.. It is not only permissible to doubt the absolute validity of space-time perception; it is, in view of the available facts, even imperative to do so. - Carl Jung, Psychology and the Occult

In science, the acceptance of new ideas follows a predictable, four-stage sequence. In Stage 1, skeptics confidently proclaim that the idea is impossible because it violates the Laws of Science. This stage can last from years to centuries, depending on how much the idea challenges conventional wisdom. In Stage 2, skeptics reluctantly concede that the idea is possible, but it is not very interesting and the claimed effects are extremely weak. Stage 3 begins when the mainstream realizes that the idea is not only important, but its effects are much stronger and more pervasive than previously imagined. Stage 4 is achieved when the same critics who used to disavow any interest in the idea begin to proclaim that they thought of it first. Eventually, no one remembers that the idea was once considered a dangerous heresy."
. . . . . . .

"From 1981 to 1995, five different US government-sponsored scientific review committees were given the task of reviewing the evidence for psi effects. The reviews were prompted by concerns that if psi was genuine, it might be important for national security reasons. We would have to assume that foreign governments would exploit psi if they could.
Reports were prepared by the Congressional Research Service, the Army Research Institute, the National Research Council, the Office of Technology Assessment, and the American Institutes for Research (the latter commissioned by the Central Intelligence Agency). While disagreeing over fine points of interpretation, all five of the reviews concluded that the experimental evidence for certain forms of psychic phenomena merited serious scientific study."
. . . . . . .

"In 1987, the National Research Council reviewed parapsychology (the scientific discipline that studies of psi) at the request of the US Army. The committee recommended that the Army monitor parapsychological research being conducted in the former Soviet Union and in the United States, they recommended that the Army consider funding specific experiments, and most significantly, they admitted that they could not propose plausible alternatives to the "psi hypothesis" for some classes of psi experiments. Dr. Ray Hyman, a psychology professor at the University of Oregon and long-term skeptic of psi phenomena, was chairman of the National Research Council's review committee on parapsychology. He stated in a 1988 interview with the Chronicle of Higher Education, that "Parapsychologists should be rejoicing. This was the first government committee that said their work should be taken seriously."

In early 1989, the Office of Technology Assessment issued a report of a workshop on the status of parapsychology. The end of the report stated that "It is clear that parapsychology continues to face strong resistance from the scientific establishment. The question is - how can the field improve its chances of obtaining a fair hearing across a broader spectrum of the scientific community, so that emotionality does not impede objective assessment of the experimental results? Whether the final result of such an assessment is positive, negative, or something in between, the field appears to merit such consideration."

In 1995, the American Institutes for Research reviewed formerly classified government-sponsored psi research for the CIA at the request of the U. S. Congress. Statistician Jessica Utts of the University of California, Davis, one of the two principal reviewers, concluded that "The statistical results of the studies examined are far beyond what is expected by chance. Arguments that these results could be due to methodological flaws in the experiments are soundly refuted. Effects of similar magnitude to those found in government-sponsored research . have been replicated at a number of laboratories across the world. Such consistency cannot be readily explained by claims of flaws or fraud.. It is recommended that future experiments focus on understanding how this phenomenon works, and on how to make it as useful as possible. There is little benefit to continuing experiments designed to offer proof..."

Surprisingly, the other principal reviewer, skeptic Ray Hyman, agreed: "The statistical departures from chance appear to be too large and consistent to attribute to statistical flukes of any sort.. I tend to agree with Professor Utts that real effects are occurring in these experiments. Something other than chance departures from the null hypothesis has occurred in these experiments."
"

. . . . . .
"Beginning in the 1880s and accumulating ever since, a new form of scientifically valid evidence appeared - empirical data produced in controlled, experimental studies. While not as exciting as folklore and anecdotes, from the scientific perspective these data were more meaningful because they were produced according to well-accepted scientific procedures. Scores of scientists from around the world had quietly contributed these studies. "

. . . . . . .
"The eventual scientific acceptance of psychic phenomena is inevitable. "
. . . . . . .

"As acceptance grows, the implications of psi will become more apparent. But we already know that these phenomena present profound challenges to many aspects of science, philosophy and religion (Chapter 18). These challenges will nudge scientists to reconsider basic assumptions about space, time, mind, and matter. Philosophers will rekindle the perennial debates over the role of consciousness in the physical world. Theologians will reconsider the concept of divine intervention, as some phenomena previously considered to be miracles will probably become subject to scientific understanding."
http://www.deanradin.com/Chapter1.html

- - -

Despite the program officially was closed down 1995. The conclusions and results are stille there.


It is known, that parapsychological research or PSI research have been and/or are going on in countries like USA, Great Brittain, France, Germany, Japan, China, Vietnam, Izrael, Italy,
Hungary, Roumania, Bulgary, Russia, Ukraine (more than 30 countries in
the world). (Taken from Russian politician, V.N. Lopatin, head of the parliamentary comission on information )
Try for instance:
http://www.wired.com/politics/security/news/2007/09/mind_reading?currentPage=all



Also the video - Dean Radin: The Global Consciousness Project (about 9/11 etc.)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cnvJfkI5NVc&feature=related

Berzin the author on Buddhism have written something quite interesting about Kalachakra and Parapsychology versus Russia:
http://www.berzinarchives.com/web/en/archives/advanced/kalachakra/shambhala/russian_japanese_shambhala.html



It seems quite certain that at least some politicians or persons with influence on politics takes parapsychology to be more than just superstition or science fiction. (And that the journalists seems to be very much out of touch with this reality.)

What do you think about it all?



M. Sufilight



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]