Re: What Were the Real Teachings of the Masters?
Aug 13, 2009 09:12 AM
by danielhcaldwell
Anand,
You reply to the above question with this concise answer:
"Writings of Leadbeater and Besant give the true teachings."
But Anand how do you know this?
I'm sorry you will have to do better than this! :)
Frank R. on this same Theos-Talk will say the very opposite!
He believes Blavatsky, Judge, Tingley and Purucker gave the
true teachings, NOT Leadbeater and Besant.
So who should we beleive?
You Anand or Frank?
To be totally honest, both of you have only made assertions
about this.
Assertions are easy to make. A dime a dozen....
Anand, how do you know that Leadbeater and Besant weren't following in H.P. Blavatsky's footsteps....giving out even more distorted, false teachings...palming them off as if from the Masters???
If Blavatsky lied and cheated as you maintain, then why not Leadbeater and Besant?? They were good students of Blavatsky and learned her craft quite well....to deceive and mislead.....
We know that Leadbeater could not have seen the Master in London in 1851, since Leadbeater wasn't born until 1854. So here we have a good example of Mr. Leadbeater's own veracity.
Daniel
http:hpb.cc
--- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, "Anand" <AnandGholap@...> wrote:
>
> --- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, "danielhcaldwell" <danielhcaldwell@> wrote:
>
> > How does a genuine seeker of truth determine what the
> > true teachings of the Masters were?
> >
> > Where does one find a true presentation of the Masters'
> > teachings?
> >
> > If HPB's writings are virtually worthless, what other
> > written sources give the true teachings of these Masters?
> --------------------------------------
>
> Writings of Leadbeater and Besant give the true teachings.
>
[Back to Top]
Theosophy World:
Dedicated to the Theosophical Philosophy and its Practical Application