Theos-Talk Archives (August 2009 Message tt00094)

Dear Annand and friends

My views are:

1.
Anand wrote:
"It is easy for them to believe, but world is getting wrong ideas from so called Mahatma Letters, which most probably are not from Mahatmas. "

The world are also getting the wrong ideas from a great many other letters from religious people through the ages.

It is more likely that some of the was materialised by not only H. P. Blavatsky. Any able clairvoyant knows, that there are more than one person who is capable of materialising such letters, and that distance to some might make such materialisations more difficult to perform. I know about this through my experiences although I am not a regular color-clairvoyant for the time being. Just ask those who are able clairvoyants.

So to give H. P. Blavatsky the credit for materialising - all - of the Mahatma Letters, when som of us know that Master Morya and Master KH was real spiritual entities, seems quite out of the question, if you ask me. Why on earth should H. P. Blavatsky operate like this, and why should the Masters Morya and KH not throw a letter to for instance Olcott telling him that those letters were fake, that H. P. Blavatksy lied blatantly, like KH did when  Laura Holloway went too far astray???( http://www.blavatskyarchives.com/MLtoLauraHolloway.htm ) 

So I do certainly not find anything "most probably" in that none of them were from the Mahatma's themselves or at least genuine in content.

2.
Anand wrote:
"The reason why appearance of so called Mahatma Letters was stopped is the producer of those letters, Blavatsky, had died."

This is an assumption Anand, and based on no real circumstantial evidence at all. 
Quite on the contrary. It is like flipping a coin, when one knows one knows otherwise the opposite or other possibilities might be just as true. You aught to face the this fact.

A whole lot of letters, articles and words from several theosophists at HPB's time are saying the opposite. Damodar, Olcott and others saw and talked with the Masters.
 
Knowing what I know and since I do not believe about the issue, I will have to disagree.
I do not like to assume anybody is nasty liar, and especially if that person has done what H. P. Blavatsky did to help humanity. But one can of course always ask questions and question the realities of issue mentioned. But where is the need to call H. P. Blavatsky a lair and a cheat? Is that in fact not what you are calling her?


M. Sufilight

  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Anand 
  To: theos-talk@yahoogroups.com 
  Sent: Thursday, August 13, 2009 10:21 AM
  Subject: Theos-World Re: original teaching or original cheating?


    This issue of origin of Mahatma Letters is extremely important. I found that most leaders in Adyar TS and elsewhere believe blindly that letters are from Masters. They do not show courage and imagination to question authenticity. It is easy for them to believe, but world is getting wrong ideas from so called Mahatma Letters, which most probably are not from Mahatmas. 
  Who told that Blavatsky could not materialize letters in other country? The reason why appearance of so called Mahatma Letters was stopped is the producer of those letters, Blavatsky, had died.

  --- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, "Morten Nymann Olesen" <global-theosophy@...> wrote:
  >
  > Dear Anand and friends
  > 
  > My views are:
  > I am glad to hear that you are not claiming that H. P. Blavatsky produced all the Mahatma Letters and materialised as the Masters Morya and Kuthumi. :-)
  > 
  > I have thought about this and reached the conclusion that secondhand testimony on that might contain errors and HPB could have had a reason to give various theosophists the impression, that the contact was not that strong, so to create a more normalised communication with her close theossophists. - Yet I was surprised to learn Constance Wacthmeister telling that H. P. Blavatsky's contact appearntly was not that well.
  > 
  > 
  > M. Sufilight
  > 
  > ----- Original Message ----- 
  > From: Anand 
  > To: theos-talk@yahoogroups.com 
  > Sent: Wednesday, August 12, 2009 11:29 PM
  > Subject: Theos-World Re: original teaching or original cheating?
  > 
  > 
  > There is also a question whether Blavatsky had only occasional contact with Masters. From her work it appears that the contact of Blavatsky with Masters could be occasional and so her every action and writing were not ratified by Masters.
  > 
  > 
  > 
  > 
  > 
  > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
  >



  

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]