Theos-Talk Archives (July 2009 Message tt00461)

unsubscribe
 
-----Original Message-----
From: theos-talk@yahoogroups.com [mailto:theos-talk@yahoogroups.com] On
Behalf Of Cass Silva
Sent: Saturday, July 25, 2009 6:25 PM
To: theos-talk@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: Theos-World Re: Personal God of Christians is true God,
Blavatsky was wrong
 
  
Frank,
I think the Dugpas have infiltrated through a few holy rollers!!
Maybe this is the last ditch effort to turn TS into religious order -
next thing we will have to face is excommunication  lol

Cass 

>
>From: opetha <opetha@yahoo. <mailto:opetha%40yahoo.ca> ca>
>To: theos-talk@yahoogro <mailto:theos-talk%40yahoogroups.com> ups.com
>Sent: Saturday, 25 July, 2009 1:24:34 AM
>Subject: Theos-World Re: Personal God of Christians is true God,
Blavatsky was wrong
>
>  
>Hi,
>
>Just as I said. Listen to the wrath in your voice. A Muslim says the
same thing to a Chistian. Justify "idiot nonsense".
>
>If you knew your normal human psychology you'd see easily that
Blavatski, Fred Phelps, Khoot Humi, (and hopefully one day yourself)
have this wrathful and selfish uprighteousness. You are just surviving
in the western world like all of us. Choose your doctrine, but don't
fight for it, you'll just be your own worst enemy.
>
>What I said is a bit deep for fundamentlaists to understand. Its like
an atheist trying to teach creationists Darwin. The psychology of
nominal verus ideal thinking has to be differentiated first.
>
>Nymmen was right in telling you to "hold your horses", you just proved
you have no personal OR absolute God in your life.
>
>G. L.
>
>--- In theos-talk@yahoogro ups.com, "Frank Reitemeyer" <ringding2009@
..> wrote:
>>
>> You write a lot of idiotic nonsense.
>> Blavatsky never declared Parabram a personal god.
>> She was also not a feminist and had no father-complex.
>> 
>> Your gossips and slanders are free inventions.
>> 
>> And of course it is not fundamentalist and dogmatic when the
contradictions and perversions of the most fundamentalist and dogmatic
religion is attacked.
>> 
>> Your mind is much twisted, as if you and Anand have taken lessions in
pervert thinking in an Indian Jesuit school.
>> 
>> I wonder, what people like Antonio, Anand or you are doing here in a
theosophical forum, when you have no good will for theosophy nor have
any basic knowledge nor you don't want to learn anything, but spread
your twisted mistaken interpretations like a Christian missionary in the
Jungle.
>> 
>> Why are you bothered so much wiht theosophy and theosophists and let
them not alone with it and you stick on your philosophy and don't
intermix it wiht theosophy nor run it under false flag.
>> 
>> Frank
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>> From: opetha 
>> To: theos-talk@yahoogro ups.com 
>> Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2009 2:53 PM
>> Subject: Theos-World Re: Personal God of Christians is true God,
Blavatsky was wrong
>> 
>> 
>> I totally agree. Blavatski herself chose a personal God called
"parabrahm", but this type of thinking is always apparent in
fundamentalist thinking.
>> 
>> It is that old difference between realism and nominalism, part of the
chosen God is a nominal dogma, but the other half is owing to an inner
projection. People can project a precious inner content on an outer
image, but Blavatski wont let Christians do this upon their God--total
fundamental, dogmatic, nominalist thinking on her helf. She never did a
days yoga in her life and has a father-complex like so many feminists.
>> 
>> It's a shame there was never a good western teacher who wasn't
unconsciously materialist at the same time. 
>> 
>> G. L.
>> 
>> --- In theos-talk@yahoogro ups.com, "Anand" <AnandGholap@ > wrote:
>> >
>> > Blavatsky's criticism of personal God of Christians is wrong. It is
born out of ignorance of spiritual realities. When Krishna took birth in
physical body, he called himself God. All his devotees had personal
relationship with this God, whom they called Krishna. When Jesus spoke,
he referred God as Father. Again his devotees had personal relationship
with God. If we study different devotional traditions around the world,
we find that in most of these traditions, God had personal relationship
with devotees. Making God personal is very nature of devotion. This is
how the path of devotion works. So Blavatsky's attacks on personal God
of Christians is wrong.
>> > Best
>> > Anand Gholap
>> >
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>>
>
>
>

__________________________________________________________
Access Yahoo!7 Mail on your mobile. Anytime. Anywhere.
Show me how: http://au.mobile. <http://au.mobile.yahoo.com/mail>
yahoo.com/mail

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]