Theos-Talk Archives (May 2009 Message tt00261)

Lean said:

"Unfortunately, the enemies of the original teachings of theosophy -- 
such as those later pseudo theosophists starting with AB, AAB, CWL, 
CP, and many other Jesuit influenced teachers with false "New World 
Order" doctrines, based on Christ oriented hierarchies -- have 
greatly distorted and lied about the teachings, and the Masters, in 
order to fulfill their ultimate secret aims and purposes -- which 
appears to be ultimately taking over control of the world 
governments for the benefit of the former monarchists and power 
brokers who currently manipulate the word economy to favor their 
personal controlled enterprises -- based on greed for money, power 
and world enslavement."

Cool, Leon. And we're almost there. A few more false flag operations a la 9/11 and a few more strategic hits to the economy and then even the stalwart Americans will walk into the trap of the perpetual welfare/warfare state laid by the hidden Anglo-American black nobility and their stooges in the banking fraternity, the international socialist movement and most importantly, the Obama administration. And for the New Agers we'll have the Benjamin Creme prophecy come true with some holographic magic. Surrender is no option; it's mandated. And if you decide to go underground, that's fine, enjoy. 8^)

Just kidding .... or  ..... ?

Question is, seriously: What can Theosophists of whatever stripe contribute to clarify current issues and trends? Do we even have the intellectual tools to understand? Or shall we just stay aloof and say it's all karma, maya and Kali Yuga?

What would you, Leon, advise as a sane way out of the danger you see looming? 

Govert


  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Leon Maurer 
  To: theos-talk@yahoogroups.com 
  Sent: Monday, April 27, 2009 3:09 AM
  Subject: Re: Theos-World Has anyone checked accuracy of Blavatky's statements and references?






  On Apr 24, 2009, at 4/24/097:26 PM, Anand wrote:

  > Blavatsky gives many references. Has anyone checked whether those 
  > references are correct or not? Has anyone shown contradictions?

  So far after studying and teaching, for more than 40 years, the works 
  of Blavatsky and the references she gave out, I have never come 
  across a reference that was quoted incorrectly, nor has anyone ever 
  shown evidence that any of blavatsky's teachings are contradictory. 
  In fact they accurately predicted all the findings of modern physics 
  since Einstein found E-mc^2 presaged in the SD... And string 
  theorists are just beginning to reach the same conclusions about the 
  nature of space and time that she clearly presaged. See:
  http://leonmaurer.info/einstein.html

  In fact, her metaphysics clearly agrees with all the great masters of 
  antiquity, from Hermes through Pythagorus, Plato and the later 
  Neoplatonists, Plotinus and Porphyry, up to the esoteric teachings of 
  the Buddha, and the original Upanishads and Puranas, as well as the 
  Book of the Golden Precepts -- which I studied under one of the 
  leading disciples of the Late Panchan Lama -- while comparing it with 
  the teachings in the Secret Doctrine.

  Interestingly, during this comparison, we noted that the reprints of 
  the SD, reedited by AB and sold by Quest Books, had removed all the 
  important original diacritical marks and typographic clues used by 
  Blavatsky -- which deletions subtly distorted the esoteric teachings, 
  and, consequently, did not conform with the ancient masters, or the 
  Book of the Golden Precepts that contained the same cosmogenesis as 
  the Book of Dzyan,. Also, some of these teachings were modified by 
  CWL in such a manner as to conform with his Christianized theosophy 
  needed to support his LCC religion -- that had to also conform with 
  the Christian Bible and the Catholic theological dogmas concerning 
  the heavenly powers and the divinity of Jesus.. Thus its the 
  teachings of CWL, AB and, later AAB, AB that is totally contradictory 
  to. the "real" theosophy , as it was known to all the ancient masters 
  of wisdom, and the masters who taught Blavatsky

  Unfortunately, the enemies of the original teachings of theosophy -- 
  such as those later pseudo theosophists starting with AB, AAB, CWL, 
  CP, and many other Jesuit influenced teachers with false "New World 
  Order" doctrines, based on Christ oriented hierarchies -- have 
  greatly distorted and lied about the teachings, and the Masters, in 
  order to fulfill their ultimate secret aims and purposes -- which 
  appears to be ultimately taking over control of the world 
  governments for the benefit of the former monarchists and power 
  brokers who currently manipulate the word economy to favor their 
  personal controlled enterprises -- based on greed for money, power 
  and world enslavement.

  Anyone who continues to follow these false teachers and their 
  attempt to denigrate the teachings of Blavatsky, are today the 
  stooges oif thses enemies of theosophy, and all of mankind that is 
  forced to live under their new world order "globalization."

  I hope this clears the air a bit and explains why the original 
  metaphysical teachings of Blavatsky, based on the ancient Book of 
  Dzyan, and its immutable formulas explaining cosmogenesis and 
  anthropogenesis, is the only theosophy there is, that conforms with 
  all the ancient masters, and which cannot be contradicted by phony 
  "Masters" and the personal power hungry stooges who invented them.

  LHM

  >
  >
  >
  > ------------------------------------
  >
  > Yahoo! Groups Links
  >
  >
  >

  [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



  

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]