Theos-Talk Archives (April 2009 Message tt00469)

Dear friends

My views are:

May I offer a few words?


 Blavatsky said:
"He who objects to having his views controverted and criticized 
  must not write for Lucifer. " ..."Moreover, we have given good proofs 
  of our impartiality. We published articles and letters criticizing 
  not alone our personal theosophical and philosophical views, but 
  discussing on subjects directly concerned with our personal honour 
  and reputation; reviving the infamous calumnies in which not simple 
  doubts, but distinctly formulated charges of dishonesty were cast 
  into our teeth and our private character was torn to shreds (Vide "A 
  Glance at Theosophy from the Outside", Lucifer for October, 1888). 
  And if the editor will never shrink from what she considers her duty 
  to her readers, and that she is prepared to throw every possible 
  light upon mooted questions in order that truth should shine bright 
  and hideous lies and superstitions be shown under their true colours -
  why should our contributors prove themselves so thin-skinned?"
  ( IS DENUNCIATION A DUTY? by H. P. Blavatsky - Lucifer Magazine 
  1888)


I say:
Now we hear from Anand, that the CWL and Annie Besant view should reign instead.That view is in opposition to the above view by Blavatsky. So therefore Anand has created his own theosophical teachings and programe, which was and is not in accordance with the original programe.

And despite confronting Anand with this, I guess he will continue to believe that his program is the real one. So one could ask: Are you able to defend your views Anand?



M. Sufilight

  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: danielhcaldwell 
  To: theos-talk@yahoogroups.com 
  Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2009 8:33 PM
  Subject: Theos-World I'm away from here a week and all the good stuff happens :(





  Gee, I'm away from here for a week or so and then come back and see that all the good stuff has happened!!!

  I am amused by Anand's latest:

  --------------------------------------------------
  Of course I made efforts to change. These individuals don't change despite telling them again and again and explaining things. Daniel did not change. Katinka has not distanced herself from J. Krishnamurti. Look at her site www.katinkahesselink.net and you will know. Her promotion of Krishnamurti has become only a little less.
  ---------------------------------------------------

  Unfortunately, Anand never really ever explains anything.

  He will usually ignore major points and then to minor things add a few sentences and I guess he considers that his "explanation".

  Several years ago Anand wrote me a private email scolding me for not respecting the masters. 

  He said I shouldn't be publishing material that might reflect poorly on Mr. Leadbeater. At the time I believe I also told him I published material that was also negative about HPB.

  Over the years Anand has seen fit to publish all sorts of comments negative about HPB. Fine and good. But apparently that doesn't damage the Theosophical Movement but publish negative material about Leadbeater and you are damaging the movement. Or so he "reasons"....

  Furthermore on his own chat groups he has censored over the years the views of many persons who dare to say something not approved by Anand. 

  Apparently Anand lives in his own altered reality and is oblivious to any other points of view. 

  But he is free to believe what he wants and free to express his views here on Theos-Talk. But thank "God" he is not the moderator of this group or he would censor and ban all messages and posters who do not conform to his views.

  Daniel
  http://hpb.cc

  --- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, "Anand" <AnandGholap@...> wrote:
  >
  > 
  > > Learn to make it more personal. Tell Daniel what you feel if his postings bother you. 
  > > 
  > > Meanwhile, you have to graciously acknowledge that Katinka a while ago distanced herself somewhat from K! 
  > > 
  > > Peace
  > > 
  > > Govert
  > 
  > Of course I made efforts to change. These individuals don't change despite telling them again and again and explaining things. Daniel did not change. Katinka has not distanced herself from J. Krishnamurti. Look at her site www.katinkahesselink.net and you will know. Her promotion of Krishnamurti has become only a little less.
  >



  

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]