Theos-Talk Archives (April 2009 Message tt00382)

On Apr 24, 2009, at 4/24/097:26 PM, Anand wrote:

> Blavatsky gives many references. Has anyone checked whether those  
> references are correct or not? Has anyone shown contradictions?

So far after studying and teaching, for more than 40 years, the works  
of Blavatsky and the references she gave out, I have never come  
across a reference that was quoted incorrectly, nor has anyone ever  
shown evidence that any of blavatsky's teachings are contradictory.   
In fact they accurately predicted all the findings of modern physics  
since Einstein found E-mc^2 presaged in the SD... And string  
theorists are just beginning to reach the same conclusions about the  
nature of space and time that she clearly presaged.  See:
http://leonmaurer.info/einstein.html

In fact, her metaphysics clearly agrees with all the great masters of  
antiquity, from Hermes through Pythagorus, Plato and the later  
Neoplatonists, Plotinus and Porphyry, up to the esoteric teachings of  
the Buddha, and the original Upanishads and Puranas, as well as the  
Book of the Golden Precepts -- which I studied under one of the  
leading disciples of the Late Panchan Lama -- while comparing it with  
the teachings in the Secret Doctrine.

Interestingly, during this comparison, we noted that the reprints of  
the SD, reedited by AB and sold by Quest Books, had removed all the  
important original diacritical marks and typographic clues used by  
Blavatsky -- which deletions subtly distorted the esoteric teachings,  
and, consequently, did not conform with the ancient masters, or the  
Book of the Golden Precepts that contained the same cosmogenesis as  
the Book of Dzyan,.  Also, some of these teachings were modified by  
CWL in such a manner as to conform with his Christianized theosophy  
needed to support his LCC religion -- that had to also conform with  
the Christian Bible and the Catholic theological dogmas concerning  
the heavenly powers and the divinity of Jesus..  Thus its the  
teachings of CWL, AB and, later AAB, AB that is totally contradictory  
to. the "real" theosophy , as it was known to all the ancient masters  
of wisdom, and the masters who taught Blavatsky
    
Unfortunately, the enemies of the original teachings of theosophy --  
such as those later pseudo theosophists starting with AB, AAB, CWL,  
CP, and many other Jesuit influenced teachers with false "New World  
Order" doctrines, based on Christ oriented hierarchies -- have  
greatly distorted and lied about the teachings, and the Masters, in  
order to fulfill their ultimate secret aims and purposes -- which  
appears to be  ultimately taking over control of the world  
governments for the benefit of the former monarchists and power  
brokers who currently manipulate the word economy to favor their  
personal controlled enterprises -- based on greed for money, power  
and world enslavement.

Anyone  who continues to follow these false teachers and their  
attempt to denigrate the teachings of Blavatsky, are today the  
stooges oif thses enemies of theosophy, and all of mankind that is  
forced to live under their new world order "globalization."

I hope this clears the air a bit and explains why the original  
metaphysical teachings of Blavatsky, based on the ancient Book of  
Dzyan, and its immutable formulas explaining cosmogenesis and  
anthropogenesis, is the only theosophy there is, that conforms with  
all the ancient masters, and which cannot be contradicted by phony  
"Masters" and the personal power hungry stooges who invented them.

LHM




>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]