Theos-Talk Archives (March 2009 Message tt00051)

Dear Anand

Thank you for your reply.

I now have an understanding of your opinion. 

You write, "It was Blavatsky who materialized letters with
her own incorrect understanding of Mahatma's thoughts."

Are you able to to explain how you know that her understanding 
was incorrect?

Regards
Nigel 
 

--- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, "Anand" <AnandGholap@...> wrote:
>
> --- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, "nhcareyta" <nhcareyta@> wrote:
> >
> > Dear Anand
> > 
> > Here is another message you have not answered previously.
> > Would you kindly answer it now?
> > 
> > Regards
> > Nigel
> > 
> > > Dear Anand
> > > 
> > > You write, "Besant and Leadbeater were not disciples of 
Blavatsky, 
> > > they were disciples of Mahatmas."
> > > 
> > > If this is true, can you explain why Dr Besant and Bishop 
> > > Leadbeater so dramatically contradicted and misrepresented the 
> > > teachings of those very same Mahatmas, WHILST CLAIMING TO BE IN 
> > > DIRECT CONTACT WITH THEM AND REPRESENTING THEIR WORK?
> > > 
> 
> 
> The reason for contradictions is so called Mahatma Letters were not
> written by Mahatmas. It was Blavatsky who materialized letters with
> her own incorrect understanding of Mahatma's thoughts. 
> Leadbeater and Besant wrote what they experienced. And despite 
contact
> with the same Masters, each disciple may understand Masters and 
their
> work differently. That is why there are differences among 
occultists. 
> You can note that Subba Rao also was disciple and was in contact 
with
> Masters and yet he had opinions different from Blavatsky.
> Best
> Anand Gholap
>