theos-talk.com

[MASTER INDEX] [DATE INDEX] [THREAD INDEX] [SUBJECT INDEX] [AUTHOR INDEX]

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: Theos-World Can we see Obama as Hitler in Mass Psychosis.

Jan 22, 2009 00:22 AM
by Martin


Not at all, however there has been done a lot behind the scenes, normal people are not aware off...and we are still being played around...It is all about power and the abuse of it.
One fundamental Law in Nature is: thou shall not abuse power to undermine someone elses choices or will and replace it with your own. There is only 1 Will and that is the Will of the One Spirit we all live in. All that is allowed so to speak is tune in that Cosmic Will and in the end you will become that Will. Any Buddha is One with that Will, so they became the Law.

--- On Thu, 1/22/09, Cass Silva <silva_cass@yahoo.com> wrote:
From: Cass Silva <silva_cass@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: Theos-World Can we see Obama as Hitler in Mass Psychosis.
To: theos-talk@yahoogroups.com
Date: Thursday, January 22, 2009, 8:29 AM










    
            Give me a break Martin - you expect me to take the word of these guys?

 

Cass



--- On Thu, 22/1/09, Martin <Mvandertak@yahoo. com> wrote:



From: Martin <Mvandertak@yahoo. com>

Subject: Re: Theos-World Can we see Obama as Hitler in Mass Psychosis.

To: theos-talk@yahoogro ups.com

Received: Thursday, 22 January, 2009, 5:49 AM



Well, do a search on Albert Pike, Zionism, Illuminati etc.



--- On Wed, 1/21/09, Cass Silva <silva_cass@ yahoo. com> wrote:

From: Cass Silva <silva_cass@ yahoo. com>

Subject: Re: Theos-World Can we see Obama as Hitler in Mass Psychosis.

To: theos-talk@yahoogro ups.com

Date: Wednesday, January 21, 2009, 1:20 AM



No I didn't know that it was the US and Britain that got Germany into the war - in fact I find that hard to swallow without any evidence - the US bled the brits dry and only came in at the end - what was it Churchill said - America helped win the war even if it was late in coming?



 



I think the Brits knew something was brewing but didn't act on it until Poland.  As far as Israel is concerned there was no need for an Israel until after the holocaust 



 



Cass



--- On Wed, 21/1/09, Martin <Mvandertak@ yahoo. com> wrote:



From: Martin <Mvandertak@ yahoo. com>



Subject: Re: Theos-World Can we see Obama as Hitler in Mass Psychosis.



To: theos-talk@yahoogro ups.com



Received: Wednesday, 21 January, 2009, 10:27 AM



Cass,



It was the English and Americans with Churchill that got Germany in another war for starters...everythi ng was planned including the making of the state of Israel. The evil involved was and still is for the most part Anglo-American but of course also German, since mighty Germans, financially that is, had their interests as well in the global economy arisen from any war. The spirit of true Germans is unbeaten, their is a lot to learn from that. Did you know btw, the English were the first to wear a swastika in the FIRST worldwar?



--- On Tue, 1/20/09, Cass Silva <silva_cass@ yahoo. com> wrote:



From: Cass Silva <silva_cass@ yahoo. com>



Subject: Re: Theos-World Can we see Obama as Hitler in Mass Psychosis.



To: theos-talk@yahoogro ups.com



Date: Tuesday, January 20, 2009, 11:34 PM



Frank, I am not sure what point you are trying to make other than your patriotism towards Germany.  Germany was helped considerably by the US and Britain after the war - money was poured in to re-establish the country even though this motive may have been based on future economic gains - US bases in Germany also poured millions into the economy.  My mother who was English would remark that the British would have been better off if Germany had won the war.  Things were terrible in the UK for up to 25 years after - and I believe it was only in the last 50 years that Britain repaid the loan to the US - where British Rail was mortgage in order to fund the debt.  For 5 years after the war the British were still on rashion cards! 



No doubt this economic downturn will cause those with cash the ability to buy up cheap properties and thus starting the cycle all over again.  Even Germany cannot avoid what is to come in job losses.



This may not be a bad thing for governments or people as we will get the opportunity to reassess the difference between what we need and what we want - what is really important in life.



Cass



____________ _________ _________ __



From: Frank Reitemeyer <dzyan@online. de>



To: theos-talk@yahoogro ups.com



Sent: Tuesday, 20 January, 2009 4:53:48 PM



Subject: Re: Theos-World Can we see Obama as Hitler in Mass Psychosis.



The Illuminati did not want the change upwards, because shareholder value was ended and the bankers could not suck out the people anymore.



The result was that the masses got a yearly increasing wealth, four weeks of holidays, pension, health care, a cheap and indestructible auto - Volkswagen Beetle/Kaefer, idea and design by big H - and KdF holidays in foreign countries - which was at this time, were the French and British worker was still nothing more than a slave with no hope to see once in the lifetime a foreign country, so unbelievable that Disney produced cartoon moives with Mickey Mouse and Donald Duck about it, claiming that this all was merely German propaganda and not real.



Note, that this wonderland of which Roosevelt spoke and of which Obama dreams now already existed in Germany. In the real world. To touch. Without banksters, interests, compound interests (officials was forbidden to have shares from the military-industrial complex), without fear and sorrow, with the daily feeling of justice, truth and prosper. Fear was only on the side of the Jesuits, who would earn money with each dead human being.



The big difference is in the motive and that the one appealed to forces from within and to solve the problems, which others have brought into the country, by themselves, while the other method is piracy, steal the possessions of other nations, to live as a vampyre on the cost of others. USA is a whole continent with raw materials of all kind, from diamonds to oil. Germany is poor land without raw materials and tiny in comparision. How is it possible that the USA cannot live on its own? I guess the FED had to gear down the mind control a little bit, because true force comes only from the higher self. But with this they would risk their discovery - as in Star Trek where Kirk and Spock came to a planet of apparently lucky inhabitants who lived behind invisible walls and were controlled from behind.



Frank



----- Original Message ----- 



From: Cass Silva 



To: theos-talk@yahoogro ups.com 



Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2009 12:42 AM



Subject: Re: Theos-World Can we see Obama as Hitler in Mass Psychosis.



Racists and fundamental christians are comparing Obama to Hitler as the next Anti-Christ - We all know that no such entity exists so this article is using the same technique that it argues Obama and Hitler used. Germany needed a change then just as America needs a change now - change can only come about through strong leadership - until Americans start using the 'heil obama' signal I will give him the benefit of the doubt. 



It took 8 years for the Americans and the World to wake up to Bush and his ideology of war - what? were we all hypnotised for 8 years?



So No, I don't see Obama as Hitler in Mass Psychosis anymore than I see Martin Luther King that way.



Cass 



____________ _________ _________ __



From: christinaleestemake r <christinaleestemak e r@yahoo.com>



To: theos-talk@yahoogro ups.com



Sent: Tuesday, 20 January, 2009 7:53:09 AM



Subject: Theos-World Can we see Obama as Hitler in Mass Psychosis.



Obama's speeches are a mass of mind-control techniques and Neuro-



Linguistic-Programm ing, or NLP, and they are carefully constructed to 



implant beliefs and perceptions into the mind of the viewer. Click 



here for a description of his psycho-babble, headed An Examination of 



Obama's Use of Hidden Hypnosis Techniques in His Speeches.



As I keep emphasising, the whole Obama circus is an exercise in mass 



mind control and it has been so successful because so many people 



live their lives in a permanent state of trance. All of which brings 



me to the parallels with Nazi Germany, fascist Italy and similar 



regimes throughout history.



Obama may not look like Hitler, nor sound like Hitler, but the themes 



are just the same. Germany was in a terrible state economically and 



militarily in the 1930s in the aftermath of the First World War and 



the reparations inflicted on the country by the Rothschild/Illumina ti-



controlled Versailles 'Peace' Conference in 1919.



>From amid the chaos came the man that Germans saw then in much the 



same way that so many see Obama today. His name was Adolf Hitler and 



his oratory and rhetoric, again supported by a ritualistic 



presentation founded on mind-control techniques, made him appear to 



be the German 'messiah', the German Obama.



Hitler promised 'change', 'hope' and something to 'believe in' amidst 



the consequences of war and financial collapse. He spoke to vast 



rallies of adoring followers and a mass movement emerged in support 



of Hitler's vision of a new tomorrow.



As the writer Webster Tarpley points out, fascism in its true sense 



is not just a Police State imposed by a tiny hierarchy. It might end 



up like that, but first it is brought to power by a mass movement 



from within the people who have no understanding of what the 



'change', hope' and 'believe' they are being offered really means. 



They just know that they want some because, as with Obama, they make 



it mean what they want it to mean. Only later do they see, to their 



horror, what they have signed up for.



Obama's America ...



... Hitler's Germany.



There may seem to be a world of difference, but the techniques are 



just the same.



Obama is far more dangerous than Bush because he can sell a line to 



those who are in the trance while Boy Bush could not do that on 



anything like the same scale. Bush was a transparent idiot with no 



communication skills who needed massive fraud at the polls to get him 



officially 'elected'. He could never be the figurehead to inspire a 



mass movement of the people to support some vacuous 'hope', 'change' 



and 'believe' when they don't even know what those words are supposed 



to mean.



But Obama clearly can, because he has.



One of 'his' (his controllers' ) prime targets are the young, just as 



they were with the Nazis and the Hitler Youth Movement. If you think 



this parallel is far-fetched then have a look at this video to see 



how extreme Obama worship has already become for some young people. 



Hitler Youth was just the same. Click here to watch ... 



In line with this theme, the WorldNetDaily website reported:



'The official website of President-Elect Barack Obama, Change.gov, 



originally announced that Obama would "require" all middle school 



through college students to participate in community service 



programs; but after a flurry of blogs protested children being 



drafted into Obama's proposed youth corps, the website's wording was 



softened.



Originally, under the tab "America Serves", Change.gov read, 



"President-Elect Obama will expand national service programs like 



AmeriCorps and Peace Corps and will create a new Classroom Corps to 



help teachers in under served schools, as well as a new Health Corps, 



Clean Energy Corps, and Veterans Corps.



"Obama will call on citizens of all ages to serve America, by 



developing a plan to require 50 hours of community service in middle 



school and high school and 100 hours of community service in college 



every year," the site announced.'



For the full story, click here ...



Obama said in a speech in July 2008 in Colorado Springs that he 



wanted to see a 'civilian national security force' that would be as 



powerful and well-funded as the Marines, Navy and Air Force. As 



Joseph Farah, founder of WorldNetDaily, wrote:



'If we're going to create some kind of national police force as big, 



powerful and well funded as our combined U.S. military forces, isn't 



this rather a big deal? I thought Democrats generally believed the 



U.S. spent too much on the military.



How is it possible their candidate is seeking to create some kind of 



massive but secret national police force that will be even bigger 



than the Army, Navy, Marines and Air Force put together? Is Obama 



serious about creating some kind of domestic security force bigger 



and more expensive than that? If not, why did he say it? What did he 



mean?'



Obama meant, amid the flowery words, that he's not in favour of 



either peace or freedom. He is a front-man demagogue for the same 



force that controlled Boy Bush, Clinton, Father Bush, Reagan, Carter, 



ad infinitum; but the difference is that he has been hyped to such 



hysterical proportions that he will be allowed to get away with far 



more than they were, at least until reality dawns on the mass ranks 



of his hypnotised supporters. And, clearly, that could take some time.



The cabal will be anxious to squeeze every minute from Obama's 



honeymoon period and we can expect to see events move quickly after 



his inauguration in January.



When I was a journalist 30 years ago, I came across a technique that 



some tabloid newspaper reporters would use to get someone to speak 



with them. They would work in pairs with the first one knocking on 



the door of some distressed family who didn't want to talk with the 



media. He would tell them he was from a newspaper he didn't really 



work for and treat them with aggression and contempt to make them 



even more upset.



He would then leave and his colleague would knock on the door, tell 



them the real newspaper he was from, and act like Mr. Nice Guy. He 



would say that he understood completely how upsetting the other man 



must have been, but 'if you will only speak to me exclusively I will 



make sure that the other man, nor anyone like him, won't bother you 



again'. They usually agreed and the scam was complete.



Much the same thing is happening with regard to Bush and Obama. The 



Neoconservative 'Republican' wing of the Illuminati controlled Bush 



for eight years and led the country into foreign wars and financial 



chaos (bad guy/problem) ; now the 'Democratic' wing, led by the 



infamous Zbigniew Brzezinski, has brought forth the 'saviour', Barack 



Obama, to lead us into the sunshine with 'hope' and 'change' (good 



guy/solution) .



Hence even some more aware people say: 'At least he's not Bush'.



Apart from the unspecified 'hope, 'change' and 'believe', few have 



any idea what Obama's policies will be. Public perception comes from 



having an 'image' of him, or a self-projection, not the fine print 



because Obama doesn't do fine print until the votes are cast and even 



then he will hide it in his windbag words.



There is an 'image' that Obama is against war, but no he's not. He 



says he's against the invasion of Iraq, though we'll see what he does 



about that in office. How can a man calling for more troops, 



including European troops, to be sent to Afghanistan be against war? 



He has also said he is prepared to bomb Pakistan and use military 



force to stop Iran building nuclear weapons and he has appointed 



Hillary 'Let's bomb 'em' Clinton (Bilderberg Group, Trilateral 



Commission, Council on Foreign Relations) as Secretary of State and 



re-appointed Bush's 'Let's bomb 'em' Secretary of Defense, Robert 



Gates (Bilderberg Group, Council on Foreign Relations). So that's the 



'change we can believe in', then.



Obama isn't against war at all and, if his controllers have their 



way, he will engage the US in even more foreign conflicts with the 



troops sent to their deaths, and the deaths of their targets, on a 



wave of oratory from the dark suit with the black face who would 



never go where he's sending them.



He claims to be a 'uniter', which is exactly what Bush said about 



himself before he came to office, but unity in and of itself is not 



the issue. Nazi Germany had unity in the early years of the war, but 



was that a good thing? What matters is what the unity is designed to 



achieve and Obama's much-vaunted 'unity' is to 'inspire' a mass 



movement to support the Orwellian plans of the Illuminati.



His constant rhetoric about 'bringing people together' can be used to 



justify the 'coming together' of the United States, Canada and Mexico 



in the North American Union; it can be used to concede America's 



sovereignty to the 'coming together' of the 'world community' (world 



dictatorship) ; it can be used to unite the believers in their 



opposition and condemnation of non-believers, which is precisely what 



happened in Nazi Germany with the book-burning and violent 



suppression of those who challenged the Hitler regime.



The potential of Obama Mania is endless when it comes to selling 



fascism as 'hope, change', 'freedom' and a 'New America', or 'New 



World' [Order].



Bush and Cheney were transparent warmongers and would always have 



struggled to bring in the draft, the compulsory enlistment of people 



into the military against their will. But it would not be as 



difficult for Obama in the current climate. For goodness sake, he's 



already talking about compulsory community service for middle school, 



high school and college students and creating a peoples' army in 



America.



That's why I say Obama is far more dangerous to freedom than Bush. In 



the last eight years Bush could only get part of the way to fascism - 



Obama has the potential to finish the job, for all the reasons I have 



mentioned and more.



You only have to look at the cabal behind Obama, and those he has 



already appointed to his administration team, to see what his 



'change' is truly planned to be. His mentor, svengali and main 



controller is Zbigniew Brzezinski, Jimmy Carter's National Security 



Advisor, and the co-founder, with David Rockefeller, of the 



Illuminati's Trilateral Commission.



Brzezinski has admitted publicly that he began to fund and train what 



he would call today 'terrorists' in Afghanistan to oppose the Soviet-



controlled government in the capital, Kabul, in the late 1970s. The 



idea, he said, was to entice the Soviet Union to invade Afghanistan 



to protect the Kabul regime and thus give the rival superpower 'their 



Vietnam'. The plan worked at the cost of a million Afghan lives 



during the Soviet occupation from 1979 to 1989, a consequence that 



troubles Brzezinski not at all.



Brzezinski's 'freedom fighters' would become known as the 



'Mujahideen' and later the Taliban and what is claimed to be 'Al-



Qaeda'. This is the man behind 'anti-war', Barack Obama. It was 



common knowledge that President Carter would do nothing involving 



foreign policy without the okay from Brzezinski, the co-founder of 



the Trilateral Commission which chose Carter for president.



It is one of many great ironies of the Obama presidency that he is 



demanding massive troop reinforcements to be sent to Afghanistan to 



fight the Taliban terrorists who were initially armed, trained and 



organised by Brzezinski, the man behind Obama. As Morpheus says in 



The Matrix: 'Fate, it seems, is not without its sense of irony'.



But then, in Brzezinski's case, it is not 'fate', but cold 



calculation that has brought it all about. The Poland-born Brzezinski 



has a fierce hatred of Russia and that is still one of his key 



targets, together with China.



And if they are Brzezinski's targets, they are Obama's targets.



The Trilateral Commission and the wider Brzezinski network, including 



Illuminati fronts like the Ford Foundation, have now chosen Obama and 



the situation will be the same. Brzezinski will call the shots; 



Obama's job is simply to sell them to the people. This is rather 



alarming when you think that Brzezinski wants to trigger a war 



involving Russia and China. 'Obama's' policies come straight from 



Brzezinski's books. Here is one Brzezinski quote you might recognise 



and it was made before Obama ran for president:



'Needed social reassessment ... can be encouraged by deliberate civic 



education that stresses the notion of service to a higher cause than 



oneself. As some have occasionally urged, a major step in that 



direction would be the adoption of an obligatory period of national 



service for every young adult, perhaps involving a variety of 



congressionally approved domestic or foreign good works.'



Now where have I heard that before?



As an Illuminati operative, Brzezinski's aim is to create a world 



government, central bank, currency and army - a global dictatorship - 



underpinned by a microchipped population connected to a global 



computer/satellite system. He wrote a book in 1970, Between Two Ages: 



America's Role in the Technetronic Era, in which he described the 



global society that he and the Illuminati seek to impose:



'The technetronic era involves the gradual appearance of a more 



controlled society. Such a society would be dominated by an elite, 



unrestrained by traditional values. Soon it will be possible to 



assert almost continuous surveillance over every citizen and maintain 



up-to-date complete files containing even the most personal 



information about the citizen. These files will be subject to 



instantaneous retrieval by the authorities. '



He also said in the same book nearly 40 years ago:



'Today we are again witnessing the emergence of transnational 



elites ... [Whose] ties cut across national boundaries ... It is 



likely that before long the social elites of most of the more 



advanced countries will be highly internationalist or globalist in 



spirit and outlook ... The nation-state is gradually yielding its 



sovereignty ... Further progress will require greater American 



sacrifices. More intensive efforts to shape a new world monetary 



structure will have to be undertaken, with some consequent risk to 



the present relatively favorable American position.'



And what does his puppet, Obama, now say that Americans have to do to 



bring about 'change'? 'Make sacrifices'. As Mrs. Demagogue, Michelle, 



said:



'We need a different leadership because our souls are broken. We need 



to be inspired ... to make the sacrifices that are needed to push us 



to a different place.'



You can bet that this will include sacrificing more sovereignty and 



freedom on the road to the global dictatorship described by 



Brzezinski for decades.



Brzezinski's son, Mark, was an 'advisor' to the Obama campaign (doing 



what his father told him) and, in line with the American one-party-



state, his other son, Ian, was foreign policy advisor to the McCain 



campaign (doing what his father told him). His daughter, the Obama-



supporting Mika Brzezinski, reported the campaign for MSNBC 



television.



Obama has been the chosen one for a long time, a fact known only to a 



few in the deep inner circle, and his relationship with Brzezinski 



almost certainly goes back to the start of the 1980s when he attended 



the Ivy League, and big-time Illuminati, Columbia University where 



Brzezinski was head of the Institute for Communist Affairs. Obama 



simply will not talk in any detail about this period. He has been 



covertly funded and supported ever since by the Trilateral Commission 



and its network of foundations connecting into the Ford Foundation, 



for whom Obama's mother worked.



And a question: Does anyone really believe that someone, a 'man of 



the people', would simply appear from apparently nowhere to run the 



slickest and best-funded presidential campaign in American history? 



He was chosen long ago by those who wish to enslave the very people 



that Obama says he wants to 'set free'.



The sources of Obama funding read like a Wall Street Who's Who - 



Goldman Sachs, UBS, Citigroup, Credit Suisse, Deutsche Bank, J.P. 



Morgan Chase, Morgan Stanley, and so on. No wonder he went back on 



his pledge to accept the limitations of public funding for his 



campaign and instead took the no-limit option of 'private' funding.



And those people are going to support a candidate who does not 



represent their best interests?? Oh please.



Obama and his seasoned network of professional manipulators, sorry 



his 'campaign team', sold the lie that he had refused to take funding 



from 'lobbyists', those who are paid to ensure that politicians frame 



legislation, or block it, in the interests of their clients.



But like everything that surrounds Obama, past and present, it's a 



sleight of hand and mouth. They funnelled vast sums of money into the 



Obama accounts through law firms that represent lobbyists and lobby 



groups. It provided 'plausible denial' about funding from lobbyists 



while the money poured in from lobby interests via third parties.



Then there is the Jewish financier, George Soros, the multi-



billionaire associate of Brzezinski and closely involved with the 



funding and marketing of Obama. Soros is a former board member of the 



Illuminati's Council on Foreign Relations and funds the European 



Council on Foreign Relations. In short, he is a major insider.



You can certainly see the Soros/Brzezinski techniques in the Obama 



'revolution' in the United States. It was the complex and secretive 



network of Soros foundations and organisations, connected to the 



intelligence agencies of the US and Israel, that trained and funded 



students in the Ukraine, Georgia and elsewhere in the art of mass 



protest and overthrowing governments.



These manufactured protests were sold to the world as 'peoples' 



revolutions' , but it just so happened that when they were over and 



the old regime was removed the new leaders were those waiting in the 



wings all along - the puppets of Soros, Brzezinski and their 



associated networks.



Obama is just more of the same, a big smile with strings attached, 



and controlled completely by the Illuminati networks that chose him, 



trained him, sold him and provided his record funding. It was they 



who kept his many skeletons under wraps, like the gay sex and crack 



cocaine allegations of Larry Sinclair, and they will continue to do 



so as long as he jumps to their bidding.



Obama is just another Banksters' moll prostituting himself for fame 



and power, and that's why he supported the grotesque bail-out of the 



banking system and why he will always put their interests before the 



people. His financial advisors are straight from the Wall Street 'A' 



list, including Paul Adolph Volker (Trilateral Commission, Council on 



Foreign Relations, Bilderberg Group), the head of the Federal Reserve 



from 1979 to 1987 and Illuminati to his fingertips.



Obama has made him head of the Economic Recovery Advisory Board, 



which is dominated by insiders, including its staff director and 



chief economist, Austan Goolsbee, a close Obama associate from the 



University of Chicago. Goolsbee is an initiate of the infamous 



Illuminati Skull and Bones Society at Yale University, which also 



includes Boy and Father Bush. It was Goolsbee who told the Canadian 



government not to worry about Obama's attacks on the economic effects 



of 'free trade' agreements because his words were just to win votes 



in the election campaign.



Another Wall Street insider, the Zionist Timothy Geithner (Bilderberg 



Group, Trilateral Commission, Council on Foreign Relations), was 



appointed by Obama to be his Treasury Secretary. Geithner was the 



President of the New York Federal Reserve Bank, the most powerful in 



the private 'Federal' Reserve cartel that masquerades as America's 



'central bank', and he is a former employee of both the Council on 



Foreign Relations and the appalling Kissinger Associates.



Obama's Treasury team locks into the inner circle around the Zionist 



Robert Rubin, the Director and Senior Counselor of Citigroup, co-



chairman of the Council on Foreign Relations, and economic advisor to 



Obama. Rubin, a member of the Illuminati Bilderberg Group, was the 



man behind Citigroup's strategy of expanding its risk in debt markets 



which forced it to be rescued by taxpayers' money.



The very people who caused the financial crisis are being appointed 



by Obama to decide how to respond to it (more taxpayers' money for 



them and their friends).



Rubin was Treasury Secretary to Bill Clinton and was followed in that 



post by Larry Summers (Bilderberg Group, Trilateral Commission, 



Council on Foreign Relations) - another insider appointed to Obama's 



team of 'change'. Summers is a fanatical supporter of 'free 



trade' (freedom to exploit) and 'globalisation' (global dictatorship) 



and he wrote a memo in 1991, while chief economist to the World Bank, 



saying that the bank should dump toxic waste in poor countries 



because the costs of the ensuing ill-health and death would be lower. 



When the memo was made public, Brazil's then-Secretary of the 



Environment, Jose Lutzenburger, told Summers:



'Your reasoning is perfectly logical but totally insane ... Your 



thoughts [provide] a concrete example of the unbelievable alienation, 



reductionist thinking, social ruthlessness and the arrogant ignorance 



of many conventional 'economists' concerning the nature of the world 



we live in ... If the World Bank keeps you as vice president it will 



lose all credibility. To me it would confirm what I often said ...the 



best thing that could happen would be for the Bank to disappear.'



Lutzenburger was dismissed shortly after writing this letter while 



the horrific Summers was made US Treasury Secretary by Bill Clinton 



and now he has been appointed to head the National Economic Council 



by Mr. 'change', hope' and 'believe' Obama. It's all a fairy story.



Bloomberg.com reported that the Center for American Progress (CAP), 



housed just three blocks from the White House, has become a major 



source for policy initiatives for the Obama Democratic Party. Who 



funds the Center for American Progress? George Soros.



It is simply the Neocon Project for the New American Century and the 



American Enterprise Institute under another name. Those two 



organisations developed and dictated the Bush policy of war and 



suppression of freedom and the 'CAP' and others like it will do the 



same for Obama. The CAP will fit and Obama will wear it.



In fact, except in name and rhetoric, there is no difference in theme 



between the regimes of Bush and Obama. Bush policy was dictated 



through Illuminati 'think tanks' and so is Obama's.



Bush was surrounded by slavish pursuers of Israeli interests and so 



is Obama. Mr. 'Change' has pledged his unquestioning support for 



Israel to the point of 'pass the sick bag' and his vice-president, 



Joe Biden (Bilderberg Group, Council on Foreign Relations), is a 



vehement Zionist who makes a virtue of saying he will support Israel 



in all circumstances.



Obama has appointed the arch Zionist Rahm Emanuel as his chief of 



staff and another super Zionist Jew, Dennis Ross, to be his Middle 



East Policy advisor. God help the Palestinians. Ross also served in 



the Bill Clinton and Father George Bush administrations. Oh, plenty 



of 'change' there, then.



Rahm Emanuel, a Chicago-born Congressman, is the son of Benjamin M. 



Emanuel, who was a member of the murderous Jewish terrorist 



organisation, Irgun, which helped to bomb and terrorise Israel into 



existence. The Open Secrets website reports that Emanuel was the top 



House recipient in 2008 for election contributions from 'hedge funds, 



private equity firms and the larger securities/investme nt industry'.



Emanuel was also appointed by Bill Clinton to the board of the 



mortgage giant Freddie Mac in 2000 and his tenure coincided with a 



stream of scandals and financial irregularities. It famously had to 



be bailed out by the taxpayer amid the sub-prime mortgage debacle.



Emanuel, like Obama himself, is an asset of the 'Illinois Combine', a 



cross-party network of politicians and business interests that 



conspires to manipulate Chicago politics for their own benefit. Even 



before taking over at the White House Emanuel faced calls for his 



resignation for alleged connections with the Rod Blagojevich scandal.



In December 2008 Blagojevich, the Illinois governor and associate of 



Obama, was arrested over a conspiracy involving massive corruption 



and moves to sell Obama's Senate seat in Chicago made vacant by his 



election to the presidency. It is yet another example of the 



staggering web on ongoing and infamous corruption in Chicago by the 



very networks that spawned Obama.



A close friend of Rahm Emanuel is another clone of the Illinois 



Combine, the Zionist, David Axelrod, who ran Obama's election 



campaign and will no doubt be highly influential in the Obama 



administration. Axelrod is a veteran of Chicago politics, one of the 



most corrupt political systems in the world and he worked for many 



Chicago mayors in the 1990s and on Obama's senate campaign in 2004.



Bill Clinton took his Arkansas cabal to Washington when he became 



president in 1993 and Obama is uploading his Chicago mob and handing 



them key positions of national power and influence. And these guys 



don't take prisoners.



All of this may be many things, none of them pleasant, but 'change' 



it isn't.



David Axelrod, Obama's 'narrator' and handler. Click here for a 



background article that needs some reading between the lines ... 



Obama is a monumental fraud who talks a good story, but lives a very 



different one. He won his first political office as a state senator 



in Chicago in 1996, not through the power of his policies, but by 



coldly abusing the electoral process.



Instead of running against his opponents and letting the people 



decide, he had his cronies challenge hundreds of names on the 



nomination papers of his Democratic primary rivals until they were 



all forced off the ballot by technicalities. He then ran unopposed. 



One of them, Gha-is Askia, says that Obama's behaviour belied his 



image as a champion of the little guy and crusader for voter rights:



'Why say you're for a new tomorrow, then do old-style Chicago 



politics to remove legitimate candidates? He talks about honour and 



democracy, but what honour is there in getting rid of every other 



candidate so you can run scot-free? Why not let the people decide?'



Why? Because he would probably have lost and Obama isn't interested 



in losing by playing fair. He wants to win by any means necessary. 



The only voter-right he's interested in is the right to vote for him. 



He has also used his hatchet-men like Axelrod to employ scandal to 



discredit opponents to ensure his election when the real scandal is 



the truth about Obama himself.



He is a classically corrupt main-chancer spawned from the Chicago 



political cesspit. His close connections, therefore, to seriously 



dodgy 'businessmen' and fraudsters like the now-jailed slum landlord 



Tony Rezko are exactly what you would expect.



Rezko, yet another snout in the trough of the Illinois Combine, has 



heavily funded Obama's political career and that of the now-arrested 



Rod Blagojevich, and in return they have supported massive sums being 



paid to Rezko by Chicago taxpayers to run 'public housing'.



These properties were then allowed to fall into such a state of 



danger and disrepair, including sewage running into kitchen sinks, 



that they were deemed unfit for habitation by the often black poor 



that Obama was supposed to be representing as a Senator. Some 



buildings were so bad they had to be demolished.



Rezko also secured appointments for his business associates to state 



boards and was eventually indicted for using these connections to 



demand kickbacks from businesses that wanted to do business with the 



state.



Rezko and Obama toured the $1.6 million mansion in Hyde Park, 



Chicago, which the Obamas bought at $300,000 below the asking price 



in 2005 while the Rezkos purchased the adjoining land at the full 



asking price. Some of this land was later bought by the Obamas. Rezko 



contributed a quarter of a million dollars to Obama's political 



career and served on Obama's Senate campaign finance committee, which 



raised more than $14 million.



Then there is Obama's close association with the terrorists, William 



Ayers and his wife Bernardine Dohrn. In the late sixties Ayers co-



founded the terror organisation called the Weather Underground (also 



known as the Weathermen and similar derivatives) and launched a 



campaign of bombing public places like the Pentagon and the Capitol 



Building. Three members were killed making bombs in Greenwich Village.



In 1970 Ayers was said to have described their philosophy as: 'Kill 



all the rich people. Break up their cars and apartments. Bring the 



revolution home, kill your parents, that's where it's really at ...' 



Mr. Ayers himself comes from the home of 'rich people'.



Bernardine Dohrn said this about the Charles Manson murders: 'Dig it! 



Manson killed those pigs, then they ate dinner in the same room with 



them, then they shoved a fork into a victim's stomach.''



William Ayers in 1968.



On the day of 9/11 he told the New York Times that he didn't regret 



the Weather Underground bombing campaign and believed they didn't do 



enough.



The case against Ayers and Dohrn was thrown out because of then 



illegal wire-taps and Ayers is now a professor in the College of 



Education at the University of Illinois at Chicago, holding the 



titles of Distinguished Professor of Education and Senior University 



Scholar.



Ayers recruited Obama to serve as chairman on the $100 million 



Chicago Annenberg Challenge and they worked together for seven years 



handing out grants to the 'educational' projects of people like ... 



William Ayers. They also worked together on another tax-exempt 



foundation, the Woods Fund in Chicago, which awarded grants to 



Obama's own Trinity United Church, home to his controversial pastor, 



Jeremiah Wright.



Obama's political career was effectively launched in 1995, just after 



he was made chairman of the Annenberg Challenge, at a meeting at the 



Chicago home of ... William Ayers and Bernardine Dohrn. They have 



been connected to his circle ever since if the truth be told. 



The Chicago Annenberg Challenge, run by Obama and Ayers, didn't fund 



schools directly, but instead insisted that they affiliate with 



'external partners' who were granted the money. These turned out to 



be far-left 'community organisers' so beloved of Bill Ayers and these 



groups included the Association of Community Organizations for Reform 



Now (or Acorn).



Obama also conducted 'leadership training' seminars with Acorn and 



its members began to become heavily involved in his political 



campaigns. It has also been behind efforts to 'register 



voters' (voters most likely to vote for Obama) and Nevada state 



officials raided Acorn's Las Vegas office after election authorities 



accused the group of submitting multiple voter registrations with 



fake and duplicate names.



Among the major funders of Acorn ... George Soros.



Obama even refuses to prove that he was born in the United States and 



thus qualifies to be President. He claims to have been born in 



Hawaii, but his grandmother, half-brother and half-sister in Kenya 



all insist he was born there.



'Mr. Clean' Obama has a deeply dirty background, but for now no scale 



of evidence will stop the swooning Obama zombies from believing the 



hype or burst their reality bubble. That is going to take hard 



experience and it could take some time and a lot of disappointment 



before they are released from the clutches of cognitive dissonance 



and have to admit to themselves they have been had.



It is the same for all the black people who voted for what they 



thought was the first black president when, in truth, he is a man in 



a black mask representing the interests of the white-faced Illuminati 



cabal, the very families and networks that ran the slave trade.



I don't want to be the bringer of bad news or the thwarter of dreams, 



but honesty demands it. The man is a trickster controlled by 



supertricksters. A sock puppet controlled by bigger sock puppets who 



serve an even greater and darker evil. To his masters, Obama is just 



a means to an end and if it suits them to assassinate him to trigger 



civil war and upheaval in the United States then that is what they 



will do.



Oh dear Oprah, how will you cope when reality dawns? But, then, will 



it ever??



'What? You mean you're not the Lord?' 



I can understand the appeal of Obama because people want him to be 



what he claims to be, but isn't. They are sick of the conflict, the 



corruption, the struggle we call 'life' and they want it all to 



change. But Obama's change is illusory and represents only the 



continued transformation of society in the image envisaged by Orwell.



We will see some apparently good things announced, like the closing 



of Guantanamo, to give the impression that Obama means what he says. 



But keep your eye on the ball and you'll see how the agenda of the 



global tyranny is introduced under the guise of Obama's 'hope', 



'change', 'believe', 'sacrifice' and 'coming together'.



It could take two years, maybe much more, before cognitive dissonance 



(lying to yourself) loses it current grip on the minds of the Obama 



faithful. Until then they will make endless excuses for him (lie to 



themselves) to keep the 'dream' alive.



But one day they will have to admit, by the power of the evidence 



before them, that they bought a dream and got a nightmare. What a 



pity they can't see the obvious now and save them themselves such 



painful disappointment.



Stay connected to the people that matter most with a smarter inbox. Take a look http://au.docs. yahoo.com/ mail/smarterinbo x



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



Stay connected to the people that matter most with a smarter inbox. Take a look http://au.docs. yahoo.com/ mail/smarterinbo x



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



Stay connected to the people that matter most with a smarter inbox. Take a look http://au.docs. yahoo.com/ mail/smarterinbo x



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



Stay connected to the people that matter most with a smarter inbox. Take a look http://au.docs. yahoo.com/ mail/smarterinbo x



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]




      

    
    
	
	 
	
	








	


	
	


      

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]




[Back to Top]


Theosophy World: Dedicated to the Theosophical Philosophy and its Practical Application