Theos-Talk Archives (January 2009 Message tt00485)

Yes perhaps in our world - but in America capital punishment is accepted as moral retribution
Cass




________________________________
From: Martin <Mvandertak@yahoo.com>
To: theos-talk@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, 20 January, 2009 11:29:03 AM
Subject: Re: Theos-World Can we see Obama as Hitler in Mass Psychosis.


Some1 who calls for the death penalty on international TV for ObamaÂÂ Bin CIA Laden is as much a scumbag as any other murderer...

--- On Tue, 1/20/09, Cass Silva <silva_cass@yahoo. com> wrote:
From: Cass Silva <silva_cass@yahoo. com>
Subject: Re: Theos-World Can we see Obama as Hitler in Mass Psychosis.
To: theos-talk@yahoogro ups.com
Date: Tuesday, January 20, 2009, 12:42 AM

Racists and fundamental christians are comparing Obama to Hitler as the next Anti-Christ - We all know that no such entity exists so this article is using the same technique that it argues Obama and Hitler used. Germany needed a change then just as America needs a change now - change can only come about through strong leadership - until Americans start using the 'heil obama' signal I will give him the benefit of the doubt. 

It took 8 years for the Americans and the World to wake up to BushÂand his ideology of war -Â what? were we all hypnotised for 8 years?

So No, I don't see Obama as Hitler in Mass Psychosis anymore than I see Martin Luther King that way.

CassÂ

____________ _________ _________ __

From: christinaleestemake r <christinaleestemak e r@yahoo.com>

To: theos-talk@yahoogro ups.com

Sent: Tuesday, 20 January, 2009 7:53:09 AM

Subject: Theos-World Can we see Obama as Hitler in Mass Psychosis.

Obama's speeches are a mass of mind-control techniques and Neuro-

Linguistic-Programm ing, or NLP, and they are carefully constructed to 

implant beliefs and perceptions into the mind of the viewer. Click 

here for a description of his psycho-babble, headed An Examination of 

Obama's Use of Hidden Hypnosis Techniques in His Speeches.

As I keep emphasising, the whole Obama circus is an exercise in mass 

mind control and it has been so successful because so many people 

live their lives in a permanent state of trance. All of which brings 

me to the parallels with Nazi Germany, fascist Italy and similar 

regimes throughout history.

Obama may not look like Hitler, nor sound like Hitler, but the themes 

are just the same. Germany was in a terrible state economically and 

militarily in the 1930s in the aftermath of the First World War and 

the reparations inflicted on the country by the Rothschild/Illumina ti-

controlled Versailles 'Peace' Conference in 1919.

>From amid the chaos came the man that Germans saw then in much the 

same way that so many see Obama today. His name was Adolf Hitler and 

his oratory and rhetoric, again supported by a ritualistic 

presentation founded on mind-control techniques, made him appear to 

be the German 'messiah', the German Obama.

Hitler promised 'change', 'hope' and something to 'believe in' amidst 

the consequences of war and financial collapse. He spoke to vast 

rallies of adoring followers and a mass movement emerged in support 

of Hitler's vision of a new tomorrow.

As the writer Webster Tarpley points out, fascism in its true sense 

is not just a Police State imposed by a tiny hierarchy. It might end 

up like that, but first it is brought to power by a mass movement 

from within the people who have no understanding of what the 

'change', hope' and 'believe' they are being offered really means. 

They just know that they want some because, as with Obama, they make 

it mean what they want it to mean. Only later do they see, to their 

horror, what they have signed up for.

Obama's America ...

... Hitler's Germany.

There may seem to be a world of difference, but the techniques are 

just the same.

Obama is far more dangerous than Bush because he can sell a line to 

those who are in the trance while Boy Bush could not do that on 

anything like the same scale. Bush was a transparent idiot with no 

communication skills who needed massive fraud at the polls to get him 

officially 'elected'. He could never be the figurehead to inspire a 

mass movement of the people to support some vacuous 'hope', 'change' 

and 'believe' when they don't even know what those words are supposed 

to mean.

But Obama clearly can, because he has.

One of 'his' (his controllers' ) prime targets are the young, just as 

they were with the Nazis and the Hitler Youth Movement. If you think 

this parallel is far-fetched then have a look at this video to see 

how extreme Obama worship has already become for some young people. 

Hitler Youth was just the same. Click here to watch ... 

In line with this theme, the WorldNetDaily website reported:

'The official website of President-Elect Barack Obama, Change.gov, 

originally announced that Obama would "require" all middle school 

through college students to participate in community service 

programs; but after a flurry of blogs protested children being 

drafted into Obama's proposed youth corps, the website's wording was 

softened.

Originally, under the tab "America Serves", Change.gov read, 

"President-Elect Obama will expand national service programs like 

AmeriCorps and Peace Corps and will create a new Classroom Corps to 

help teachers in under served schools, as well as a new Health Corps, 

Clean Energy Corps, and Veterans Corps.

"Obama will call on citizens of all ages to serve America, by 

developing a plan to require 50 hours of community service in middle 

school and high school and 100 hours of community service in college 

every year," the site announced.'

For the full story, click here ...

Obama said in a speech in July 2008 in Colorado Springs that he 

wanted to see a 'civilian national security force' that would be as 

powerful and well-funded as the Marines, Navy and Air Force. As 

Joseph Farah, founder of WorldNetDaily, wrote:

'If we're going to create some kind of national police force as big, 

powerful and well funded as our combined U.S. military forces, isn't 

this rather a big deal? I thought Democrats generally believed the 

U.S. spent too much on the military.

How is it possible their candidate is seeking to create some kind of 

massive but secret national police force that will be even bigger 

than the Army, Navy, Marines and Air Force put together? Is Obama 

serious about creating some kind of domestic security force bigger 

and more expensive than that? If not, why did he say it? What did he 

mean?'

Obama meant, amid the flowery words, that he's not in favour of 

either peace or freedom. He is a front-man demagogue for the same 

force that controlled Boy Bush, Clinton, Father Bush, Reagan, Carter, 

ad infinitum; but the difference is that he has been hyped to such 

hysterical proportions that he will be allowed to get away with far 

more than they were, at least until reality dawns on the mass ranks 

of his hypnotised supporters. And, clearly, that could take some time.

The cabal will be anxious to squeeze every minute from Obama's 

honeymoon period and we can expect to see events move quickly after 

his inauguration in January.

When I was a journalist 30 years ago, I came across a technique that 

some tabloid newspaper reporters would use to get someone to speak 

with them. They would work in pairs with the first one knocking on 

the door of some distressed family who didn't want to talk with the 

media. He would tell them he was from a newspaper he didn't really 

work for and treat them with aggression and contempt to make them 

even more upset.

He would then leave and his colleague would knock on the door, tell 

them the real newspaper he was from, and act like Mr. Nice Guy. He 

would say that he understood completely how upsetting the other man 

must have been, but 'if you will only speak to me exclusively I will 

make sure that the other man, nor anyone like him, won't bother you 

again'. They usually agreed and the scam was complete.

Much the same thing is happening with regard to Bush and Obama. The 

Neoconservative 'Republican' wing of the Illuminati controlled Bush 

for eight years and led the country into foreign wars and financial 

chaos (bad guy/problem) ; now the 'Democratic' wing, led by the 

infamous Zbigniew Brzezinski, has brought forth the 'saviour', Barack 

Obama, to lead us into the sunshine with 'hope' and 'change' (good 

guy/solution) .

Hence even some more aware people say: 'At least he's not Bush'.

Apart from the unspecified 'hope, 'change' and 'believe', few have 

any idea what Obama's policies will be. Public perception comes from 

having an 'image' of him, or a self-projection, not the fine print 

because Obama doesn't do fine print until the votes are cast and even 

then he will hide it in his windbag words.

There is an 'image' that Obama is against war, but no he's not. He 

says he's against the invasion of Iraq, though we'll see what he does 

about that in office. How can a man calling for more troops, 

including European troops, to be sent to Afghanistan be against war? 

He has also said he is prepared to bomb Pakistan and use military 

force to stop Iran building nuclear weapons and he has appointed 

Hillary 'Let's bomb 'em' Clinton (Bilderberg Group, Trilateral 

Commission, Council on Foreign Relations) as Secretary of State and 

re-appointed Bush's 'Let's bomb 'em' Secretary of Defense, Robert 

Gates (Bilderberg Group, Council on Foreign Relations). So that's the 

'change we can believe in', then.

Obama isn't against war at all and, if his controllers have their 

way, he will engage the US in even more foreign conflicts with the 

troops sent to their deaths, and the deaths of their targets, on a 

wave of oratory from the dark suit with the black face who would 

never go where he's sending them.

He claims to be a 'uniter', which is exactly what Bush said about 

himself before he came to office, but unity in and of itself is not 

the issue. Nazi Germany had unity in the early years of the war, but 

was that a good thing? What matters is what the unity is designed to 

achieve and Obama's much-vaunted 'unity' is to 'inspire' a mass 

movement to support the Orwellian plans of the Illuminati.

His constant rhetoric about 'bringing people together' can be used to 

justify the 'coming together' of the United States, Canada and Mexico 

in the North American Union; it can be used to concede America's 

sovereignty to the 'coming together' of the 'world community' (world 

dictatorship) ; it can be used to unite the believers in their 

opposition and condemnation of non-believers, which is precisely what 

happened in Nazi Germany with the book-burning and violent 

suppression of those who challenged the Hitler regime.

The potential of Obama Mania is endless when it comes to selling 

fascism as 'hope, change', 'freedom' and a 'New America', or 'New 

World' [Order].

Bush and Cheney were transparent warmongers and would always have 

struggled to bring in the draft, the compulsory enlistment of people 

into the military against their will. But it would not be as 

difficult for Obama in the current climate. For goodness sake, he's 

already talking about compulsory community service for middle school, 

high school and college students and creating a peoples' army in 

America.

That's why I say Obama is far more dangerous to freedom than Bush. In 

the last eight years Bush could only get part of the way to fascism - 

Obama has the potential to finish the job, for all the reasons I have 

mentioned and more.

You only have to look at the cabal behind Obama, and those he has 

already appointed to his administration team, to see what his 

'change' is truly planned to be. His mentor, svengali and main 

controller is Zbigniew Brzezinski, Jimmy Carter's National Security 

Advisor, and the co-founder, with David Rockefeller, of the 

Illuminati's Trilateral Commission.

Brzezinski has admitted publicly that he began to fund and train what 

he would call today 'terrorists' in Afghanistan to oppose the Soviet-

controlled government in the capital, Kabul, in the late 1970s. The 

idea, he said, was to entice the Soviet Union to invade Afghanistan 

to protect the Kabul regime and thus give the rival superpower 'their 

Vietnam'. The plan worked at the cost of a million Afghan lives 

during the Soviet occupation from 1979 to 1989, a consequence that 

troubles Brzezinski not at all.

Brzezinski's 'freedom fighters' would become known as the 

'Mujahideen' and later the Taliban and what is claimed to be 'Al-

Qaeda'. This is the man behind 'anti-war', Barack Obama. It was 

common knowledge that President Carter would do nothing involving 

foreign policy without the okay from Brzezinski, the co-founder of 

the Trilateral Commission which chose Carter for president.

It is one of many great ironies of the Obama presidency that he is 

demanding massive troop reinforcements to be sent to Afghanistan to 

fight the Taliban terrorists who were initially armed, trained and 

organised by Brzezinski, the man behind Obama. As Morpheus says in 

The Matrix: 'Fate, it seems, is not without its sense of irony'.

But then, in Brzezinski's case, it is not 'fate', but cold 

calculation that has brought it all about. The Poland-born Brzezinski 

has a fierce hatred of Russia and that is still one of his key 

targets, together with China.

And if they are Brzezinski's targets, they are Obama's targets.

The Trilateral Commission and the wider Brzezinski network, including 

Illuminati fronts like the Ford Foundation, have now chosen Obama and 

the situation will be the same. Brzezinski will call the shots; 

Obama's job is simply to sell them to the people. This is rather 

alarming when you think that Brzezinski wants to trigger a war 

involving Russia and China. 'Obama's' policies come straight from 

Brzezinski's books. Here is one Brzezinski quote you might recognise 

and it was made before Obama ran for president:

'Needed social reassessment ... can be encouraged by deliberate civic 

education that stresses the notion of service to a higher cause than 

oneself. As some have occasionally urged, a major step in that 

direction would be the adoption of an obligatory period of national 

service for every young adult, perhaps involving a variety of 

congressionally approved domestic or foreign good works.'

Now where have I heard that before?

As an Illuminati operative, Brzezinski's aim is to create a world 

government, central bank, currency and army - a global dictatorship - 

underpinned by a microchipped population connected to a global 

computer/satellite system. He wrote a book in 1970, Between Two Ages: 

America's Role in the Technetronic Era, in which he described the 

global society that he and the Illuminati seek to impose:

'The technetronic era involves the gradual appearance of a more 

controlled society. Such a society would be dominated by an elite, 

unrestrained by traditional values. Soon it will be possible to 

assert almost continuous surveillance over every citizen and maintain 

up-to-date complete files containing even the most personal 

information about the citizen. These files will be subject to 

instantaneous retrieval by the authorities. '

He also said in the same book nearly 40 years ago:

'Today we are again witnessing the emergence of transnational 

elites ... [Whose] ties cut across national boundaries ... It is 

likely that before long the social elites of most of the more 

advanced countries will be highly internationalist or globalist in 

spirit and outlook ... The nation-state is gradually yielding its 

sovereignty ... Further progress will require greater American 

sacrifices. More intensive efforts to shape a new world monetary 

structure will have to be undertaken, with some consequent risk to 

the present relatively favorable American position.'

And what does his puppet, Obama, now say that Americans have to do to 

bring about 'change'? 'Make sacrifices'. As Mrs. Demagogue, Michelle, 

said:

'We need a different leadership because our souls are broken. We need 

to be inspired ... to make the sacrifices that are needed to push us 

to a different place.'

You can bet that this will include sacrificing more sovereignty and 

freedom on the road to the global dictatorship described by 

Brzezinski for decades.

Brzezinski's son, Mark, was an 'advisor' to the Obama campaign (doing 

what his father told him) and, in line with the American one-party-

state, his other son, Ian, was foreign policy advisor to the McCain 

campaign (doing what his father told him). His daughter, the Obama-

supporting Mika Brzezinski, reported the campaign for MSNBC 

television.

Obama has been the chosen one for a long time, a fact known only to a 

few in the deep inner circle, and his relationship with Brzezinski 

almost certainly goes back to the start of the 1980s when he attended 

the Ivy League, and big-time Illuminati, Columbia University where 

Brzezinski was head of the Institute for Communist Affairs. Obama 

simply will not talk in any detail about this period. He has been 

covertly funded and supported ever since by the Trilateral Commission 

and its network of foundations connecting into the Ford Foundation, 

for whom Obama's mother worked.

And a question: Does anyone really believe that someone, a 'man of 

the people', would simply appear from apparently nowhere to run the 

slickest and best-funded presidential campaign in American history? 

He was chosen long ago by those who wish to enslave the very people 

that Obama says he wants to 'set free'.

The sources of Obama funding read like a Wall Street Who's Who - 

Goldman Sachs, UBS, Citigroup, Credit Suisse, Deutsche Bank, J.P. 

Morgan Chase, Morgan Stanley, and so on. No wonder he went back on 

his pledge to accept the limitations of public funding for his 

campaign and instead took the no-limit option of 'private' funding.

And those people are going to support a candidate who does not 

represent their best interests?? Oh please.

Obama and his seasoned network of professional manipulators, sorry 

his 'campaign team', sold the lie that he had refused to take funding 

from 'lobbyists', those who are paid to ensure that politicians frame 

legislation, or block it, in the interests of their clients.

But like everything that surrounds Obama, past and present, it's a 

sleight of hand and mouth. They funnelled vast sums of money into the 

Obama accounts through law firms that represent lobbyists and lobby 

groups. It provided 'plausible denial' about funding from lobbyists 

while the money poured in from lobby interests via third parties.

Then there is the Jewish financier, George Soros, the multi-

billionaire associate of Brzezinski and closely involved with the 

funding and marketing of Obama. Soros is a former board member of the 

Illuminati's Council on Foreign Relations and funds the European 

Council on Foreign Relations. In short, he is a major insider.

You can certainly see the Soros/Brzezinski techniques in the Obama 

'revolution' in the United States. It was the complex and secretive 

network of Soros foundations and organisations, connected to the 

intelligence agencies of the US and Israel, that trained and funded 

students in the Ukraine, Georgia and elsewhere in the art of mass 

protest and overthrowing governments.

These manufactured protests were sold to the world as 'peoples' 

revolutions' , but it just so happened that when they were over and 

the old regime was removed the new leaders were those waiting in the 

wings all along - the puppets of Soros, Brzezinski and their 

associated networks.

Obama is just more of the same, a big smile with strings attached, 

and controlled completely by the Illuminati networks that chose him, 

trained him, sold him and provided his record funding. It was they 

who kept his many skeletons under wraps, like the gay sex and crack 

cocaine allegations of Larry Sinclair, and they will continue to do 

so as long as he jumps to their bidding.

Obama is just another Banksters' moll prostituting himself for fame 

and power, and that's why he supported the grotesque bail-out of the 

banking system and why he will always put their interests before the 

people. His financial advisors are straight from the Wall Street 'A' 

list, including Paul Adolph Volker (Trilateral Commission, Council on 

Foreign Relations, Bilderberg Group), the head of the Federal Reserve 

from 1979 to 1987 and Illuminati to his fingertips.

Obama has made him head of the Economic Recovery Advisory Board, 

which is dominated by insiders, including its staff director and 

chief economist, Austan Goolsbee, a close Obama associate from the 

University of Chicago. Goolsbee is an initiate of the infamous 

Illuminati Skull and Bones Society at Yale University, which also 

includes Boy and Father Bush. It was Goolsbee who told the Canadian 

government not to worry about Obama's attacks on the economic effects 

of 'free trade' agreements because his words were just to win votes 

in the election campaign.

Another Wall Street insider, the Zionist Timothy Geithner (Bilderberg 

Group, Trilateral Commission, Council on Foreign Relations), was 

appointed by Obama to be his Treasury Secretary. Geithner was the 

President of the New York Federal Reserve Bank, the most powerful in 

the private 'Federal' Reserve cartel that masquerades as America's 

'central bank', and he is a former employee of both the Council on 

Foreign Relations and the appalling Kissinger Associates.

Obama's Treasury team locks into the inner circle around the Zionist 

Robert Rubin, the Director and Senior Counselor of Citigroup, co-

chairman of the Council on Foreign Relations, and economic advisor to 

Obama. Rubin, a member of the Illuminati Bilderberg Group, was the 

man behind Citigroup's strategy of expanding its risk in debt markets 

which forced it to be rescued by taxpayers' money.

The very people who caused the financial crisis are being appointed 

by Obama to decide how to respond to it (more taxpayers' money for 

them and their friends).

Rubin was Treasury Secretary to Bill Clinton and was followed in that 

post by Larry Summers (Bilderberg Group, Trilateral Commission, 

Council on Foreign Relations) - another insider appointed to Obama's 

team of 'change'. Summers is a fanatical supporter of 'free 

trade' (freedom to exploit) and 'globalisation' (global dictatorship) 

and he wrote a memo in 1991, while chief economist to the World Bank, 

saying that the bank should dump toxic waste in poor countries 

because the costs of the ensuing ill-health and death would be lower. 

When the memo was made public, Brazil's then-Secretary of the 

Environment, Jose Lutzenburger, told Summers:

'Your reasoning is perfectly logical but totally insane ... Your 

thoughts [provide] a concrete example of the unbelievable alienation, 

reductionist thinking, social ruthlessness and the arrogant ignorance 

of many conventional 'economists' concerning the nature of the world 

we live in ... If the World Bank keeps you as vice president it will 

lose all credibility. To me it would confirm what I often said ...the 

best thing that could happen would be for the Bank to disappear.'

Lutzenburger was dismissed shortly after writing this letter while 

the horrific Summers was made US Treasury Secretary by Bill Clinton 

and now he has been appointed to head the National Economic Council 

by Mr. 'change', hope' and 'believe' Obama. It's all a fairy story.

Bloomberg.com reported that the Center for American Progress (CAP), 

housed just three blocks from the White House, has become a major 

source for policy initiatives for the Obama Democratic Party. Who 

funds the Center for American Progress? George Soros.

It is simply the Neocon Project for the New American Century and the 

American Enterprise Institute under another name. Those two 

organisations developed and dictated the Bush policy of war and 

suppression of freedom and the 'CAP' and others like it will do the 

same for Obama. The CAP will fit and Obama will wear it.

In fact, except in name and rhetoric, there is no difference in theme 

between the regimes of Bush and Obama. Bush policy was dictated 

through Illuminati 'think tanks' and so is Obama's.

Bush was surrounded by slavish pursuers of Israeli interests and so 

is Obama. Mr. 'Change' has pledged his unquestioning support for 

Israel to the point of 'pass the sick bag' and his vice-president, 

Joe Biden (Bilderberg Group, Council on Foreign Relations), is a 

vehement Zionist who makes a virtue of saying he will support Israel 

in all circumstances.

Obama has appointed the arch Zionist Rahm Emanuel as his chief of 

staff and another super Zionist Jew, Dennis Ross, to be his Middle 

East Policy advisor. God help the Palestinians. Ross also served in 

the Bill Clinton and Father George Bush administrations. Oh, plenty 

of 'change' there, then.

Rahm Emanuel, a Chicago-born Congressman, is the son of Benjamin M. 

Emanuel, who was a member of the murderous Jewish terrorist 

organisation, Irgun, which helped to bomb and terrorise Israel into 

existence. The Open Secrets website reports that Emanuel was the top 

House recipient in 2008 for election contributions from 'hedge funds, 

private equity firms and the larger securities/investme nt industry'.

Emanuel was also appointed by Bill Clinton to the board of the 

mortgage giant Freddie Mac in 2000 and his tenure coincided with a 

stream of scandals and financial irregularities. It famously had to 

be bailed out by the taxpayer amid the sub-prime mortgage debacle.

Emanuel, like Obama himself, is an asset of the 'Illinois Combine', a 

cross-party network of politicians and business interests that 

conspires to manipulate Chicago politics for their own benefit. Even 

before taking over at the White House Emanuel faced calls for his 

resignation for alleged connections with the Rod Blagojevich scandal.

In December 2008 Blagojevich, the Illinois governor and associate of 

Obama, was arrested over a conspiracy involving massive corruption 

and moves to sell Obama's Senate seat in Chicago made vacant by his 

election to the presidency. It is yet another example of the 

staggering web on ongoing and infamous corruption in Chicago by the 

very networks that spawned Obama.

A close friend of Rahm Emanuel is another clone of the Illinois 

Combine, the Zionist, David Axelrod, who ran Obama's election 

campaign and will no doubt be highly influential in the Obama 

administration. Axelrod is a veteran of Chicago politics, one of the 

most corrupt political systems in the world and he worked for many 

Chicago mayors in the 1990s and on Obama's senate campaign in 2004.

Bill Clinton took his Arkansas cabal to Washington when he became 

president in 1993 and Obama is uploading his Chicago mob and handing 

them key positions of national power and influence. And these guys 

don't take prisoners.

All of this may be many things, none of them pleasant, but 'change' 

it isn't.

David Axelrod, Obama's 'narrator' and handler. Click here for a 

background article that needs some reading between the lines ... 

Obama is a monumental fraud who talks a good story, but lives a very 

different one. He won his first political office as a state senator 

in Chicago in 1996, not through the power of his policies, but by 

coldly abusing the electoral process.

Instead of running against his opponents and letting the people 

decide, he had his cronies challenge hundreds of names on the 

nomination papers of his Democratic primary rivals until they were 

all forced off the ballot by technicalities. He then ran unopposed. 

One of them, Gha-is Askia, says that Obama's behaviour belied his 

image as a champion of the little guy and crusader for voter rights:

'Why say you're for a new tomorrow, then do old-style Chicago 

politics to remove legitimate candidates? He talks about honour and 

democracy, but what honour is there in getting rid of every other 

candidate so you can run scot-free? Why not let the people decide?'

Why? Because he would probably have lost and Obama isn't interested 

in losing by playing fair. He wants to win by any means necessary. 

The only voter-right he's interested in is the right to vote for him. 

He has also used his hatchet-men like Axelrod to employ scandal to 

discredit opponents to ensure his election when the real scandal is 

the truth about Obama himself.

He is a classically corrupt main-chancer spawned from the Chicago 

political cesspit. His close connections, therefore, to seriously 

dodgy 'businessmen' and fraudsters like the now-jailed slum landlord 

Tony Rezko are exactly what you would expect.

Rezko, yet another snout in the trough of the Illinois Combine, has 

heavily funded Obama's political career and that of the now-arrested 

Rod Blagojevich, and in return they have supported massive sums being 

paid to Rezko by Chicago taxpayers to run 'public housing'.

These properties were then allowed to fall into such a state of 

danger and disrepair, including sewage running into kitchen sinks, 

that they were deemed unfit for habitation by the often black poor 

that Obama was supposed to be representing as a Senator. Some 

buildings were so bad they had to be demolished.

Rezko also secured appointments for his business associates to state 

boards and was eventually indicted for using these connections to 

demand kickbacks from businesses that wanted to do business with the 

state.

Rezko and Obama toured the $1.6 million mansion in Hyde Park, 

Chicago, which the Obamas bought at $300,000 below the asking price 

in 2005 while the Rezkos purchased the adjoining land at the full 

asking price. Some of this land was later bought by the Obamas. Rezko 

contributed a quarter of a million dollars to Obama's political 

career and served on Obama's Senate campaign finance committee, which 

raised more than $14 million.

Then there is Obama's close association with the terrorists, William 

Ayers and his wife Bernardine Dohrn. In the late sixties Ayers co-

founded the terror organisation called the Weather Underground (also 

known as the Weathermen and similar derivatives) and launched a 

campaign of bombing public places like the Pentagon and the Capitol 

Building. Three members were killed making bombs in Greenwich Village.

In 1970 Ayers was said to have described their philosophy as: 'Kill 

all the rich people. Break up their cars and apartments. Bring the 

revolution home, kill your parents, that's where it's really at ...' 

Mr. Ayers himself comes from the home of 'rich people'.

Bernardine Dohrn said this about the Charles Manson murders: 'Dig it! 

Manson killed those pigs, then they ate dinner in the same room with 

them, then they shoved a fork into a victim's stomach.''

William Ayers in 1968.

On the day of 9/11 he told the New York Times that he didn't regret 

the Weather Underground bombing campaign and believed they didn't do 

enough.

The case against Ayers and Dohrn was thrown out because of then 

illegal wire-taps and Ayers is now a professor in the College of 

Education at the University of Illinois at Chicago, holding the 

titles of Distinguished Professor of Education and Senior University 

Scholar.

Ayers recruited Obama to serve as chairman on the $100 million 

Chicago Annenberg Challenge and they worked together for seven years 

handing out grants to the 'educational' projects of people like ... 

William Ayers. They also worked together on another tax-exempt 

foundation, the Woods Fund in Chicago, which awarded grants to 

Obama's own Trinity United Church, home to his controversial pastor, 

Jeremiah Wright.

Obama's political career was effectively launched in 1995, just after 

he was made chairman of the Annenberg Challenge, at a meeting at the 

Chicago home of ... William Ayers and Bernardine Dohrn. They have 

been connected to his circle ever since if the truth be told. 

The Chicago Annenberg Challenge, run by Obama and Ayers, didn't fund 

schools directly, but instead insisted that they affiliate with 

'external partners' who were granted the money. These turned out to 

be far-left 'community organisers' so beloved of Bill Ayers and these 

groups included the Association of Community Organizations for Reform 

Now (or Acorn).

Obama also conducted 'leadership training' seminars with Acorn and 

its members began to become heavily involved in his political 

campaigns. It has also been behind efforts to 'register 

voters' (voters most likely to vote for Obama) and Nevada state 

officials raided Acorn's Las Vegas office after election authorities 

accused the group of submitting multiple voter registrations with 

fake and duplicate names.

Among the major funders of Acorn ... George Soros.

Obama even refuses to prove that he was born in the United States and 

thus qualifies to be President. He claims to have been born in 

Hawaii, but his grandmother, half-brother and half-sister in Kenya 

all insist he was born there.

'Mr. Clean' Obama has a deeply dirty background, but for now no scale 

of evidence will stop the swooning Obama zombies from believing the 

hype or burst their reality bubble. That is going to take hard 

experience and it could take some time and a lot of disappointment 

before they are released from the clutches of cognitive dissonance 

and have to admit to themselves they have been had.

It is the same for all the black people who voted for what they 

thought was the first black president when, in truth, he is a man in 

a black mask representing the interests of the white-faced Illuminati 

cabal, the very families and networks that ran the slave trade.

I don't want to be the bringer of bad news or the thwarter of dreams, 

but honesty demands it. The man is a trickster controlled by 

supertricksters. A sock puppet controlled by bigger sock puppets who 

serve an even greater and darker evil. To his masters, Obama is just 

a means to an end and if it suits them to assassinate him to trigger 

civil war and upheaval in the United States then that is what they 

will do.

Oh dear Oprah, how will you cope when reality dawns? But, then, will 

it ever??

'What? You mean you're not the Lord?' 

I can understand the appeal of Obama because people want him to be 

what he claims to be, but isn't. They are sick of the conflict, the 

corruption, the struggle we call 'life' and they want it all to 

change. But Obama's change is illusory and represents only the 

continued transformation of society in the image envisaged by Orwell.

We will see some apparently good things announced, like the closing 

of Guantanamo, to give the impression that Obama means what he says. 

But keep your eye on the ball and you'll see how the agenda of the 

global tyranny is introduced under the guise of Obama's 'hope', 

'change', 'believe', 'sacrifice' and 'coming together'.

It could take two years, maybe much more, before cognitive dissonance 

(lying to yourself) loses it current grip on the minds of the Obama 

faithful. Until then they will make endless excuses for him (lie to 

themselves) to keep the 'dream' alive.

But one day they will have to admit, by the power of the evidence 

before them, that they bought a dream and got a nightmare. What a 

pity they can't see the obvious now and save them themselves such 

painful disappointment.

Stay connected to the people that matter most with a smarter inbox. Take a look http://au.docs. yahoo.com/ mail/smarterinbo x

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]











[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 


      Stay connected to the people that matter most with a smarter inbox. Take a look http://au.docs.yahoo.com/mail/smarterinbox

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]