Theos-Talk Archives (January 2009 Message tt00382)

Double Santé





--- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, Cass Silva <silva_cass@...> wrote:
>
> The best part about Akasha is that it can be used as a seers gossip 
column!  lol
> 
> Cass
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ________________________________
> From: Morten Nymann Olesen <global-theosophy@...>
> To: theos-talk@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Friday, 16 January, 2009 5:25:06 AM
> Subject: Re: Theos-World Was the psychic Blavatsky really right 
about the Catholic Church?"
> 
> 
> I do not recall that either. But please do not read my words too 
literally.
> But you asked: "And what do I need Akasha for? "
> 
> Akasha is pervading everything.
> 
> M. Sufilight
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: Martin 
> To: theos-talk@yahoogro ups.com 
> Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2009 7:13 PM
> Subject: Re: Theos-World Was the psychic Blavatsky really right 
about the Catholic Church?"
> 
> Did you get the word hate also from Akasha, since I do not recall 
having used it?
> 
> --- On Thu, 1/15/09, Morten Nymann Olesen <global-theosophy@ 
stofanet. dk> wrote:
> From: Morten Nymann Olesen <global-theosophy@ stofanet. dk>
> Subject: Re: Theos-World Was the psychic Blavatsky really right 
about the Catholic Church?"
> To: theos-talk@yahoogro ups.com
> Date: Thursday, January 15, 2009, 6:59 PM
> 
> What is a fantasy to some is the Akasha to others.
> 
> Being one with ParaBrahm is being one with transcended compassion.
> 
> None is one with ParaBrahm without being one with the Akasha.
> 
> But if you hate being one, it is your choice.
> 
> One is one with all future, and another is not.
> 
> M. Sufilight
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> 
> From: Martin 
> 
> To: theos-talk@yahoogro ups.com 
> 
> Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2009 6:37 PM
> 
> Subject: Re: Theos-World Was the psychic Blavatsky really right 
about the Catholic Church?"
> 
> Dear Morten:
> 
> I am always interested in Ainsophy and this forum and its members. 
Accused of being a fantast by so many people I can say The Bhagavat 
Gita is as much a fantasy as is the Bible or anything written or said 
about beings who didn't sign the end book. This is why R. Steiner 
wanted to have him mentioned when quoting his works, and this is why 
I keep my own life as my own fantasy without being solepsistic ( no 
lonely whale here ) and have ordered my bookkeeper not to spread my 
whole story as of yet. And what do I need Akasha for? If I recollect 
my own life and search deep, I find sollutions to problems that 
havent even happened yet in this time on this plane of existance...
> 
> Everyone has his or hers story to tell and by the exchange of 
experiences especially in a forum like this, we can focus ourselves 
without words, forms or any of the outward sensual on That which 
lives in all of us: a causeless cause, born from the Void, blooming 
and returning into it. Accepting Nature to be the only master, and 
not just Earth's Nature!
> 
> --- On Thu, 1/15/09, Morten Nymann Olesen <global-theosophy@ 
stofanet. dk> wrote:
> 
> From: Morten Nymann Olesen <global-theosophy@ stofanet. dk>
> 
> Subject: Re: Theos-World Was the psychic Blavatsky really right 
about the Catholic Church?"
> 
> To: theos-talk@yahoogro ups.com
> 
> Date: Thursday, January 15, 2009, 5:50 PM
> 
> Dear friends and Martin
> 
> My views are:
> 
> I take it, that You are not interested in theosophy and the members 
at this forum?
> 
> Please understand Frank talked about being "lonely Wolves".
> 
> I therefore sought to tell him, that we were not alone.
> 
> Sure, The core is ParaBrahm.
> 
> The Manvantara dissolves and Pralaya is.
> 
> If it is possible for me to be more helpful to you I would 
recommend you to contemplate the following quote and the inner 
essence of it - if possible for you - in the Akasha version of the 
Bhagavad Gita.
> 
> (Try Bhagavad Gita by Sir Edwin Arnold, Chapter 8,
> 
> v16-22)
> 
> "The worlds, Arjuna! -- even Brahma's world -- 
> 
> Roll back again from Death to Life's unrest;
> 
> But they, O Kunti's Son! that reach to Me,
> 
> Taste birth no more. If ye know Brahma's Day
> 
> Which is a thousand Yugas; if ye know
> 
> The thousand Yugas making Brahma's Night,
> 
> Then know ye Day and Night as He doth know!
> 
> When that vast Dawn doth break, th' Invisible
> 
> Is brought anew into the Visible;
> 
> When that deep Night doth darken, all which is
> 
> Fades back again to Him Who sent it forth;
> 
> Yea! this vast company of living things -- 
> 
> Again and yet again produced -- expires
> 
> At Brahma's Nightfall; and, at Brahma's Dawn,
> 
> Riseth, without its will, to life new-born.
> 
> But -- higher, deeper, innermost -- abides
> 
> Another Life, not like the life of sense,
> 
> Escaping sight, unchanging. This endures
> 
> When all created things have passed away;
> 
> This is that Life named the Unmanifest,
> 
> The Infinite! the All! the Uttermost.
> 
> Thither arriving none return. That Life
> 
> Is Mine, and I am there! And, Prince! by faith
> 
> Which wanders not, there is a way to come
> 
> Thither. I, the PURUSHA, I Who spread
> 
> The Universe around me -- in Whom dwell
> 
> All living Things -- may so be reached and seen!"
> 
> http://www.theosoph y-nw.org/ theosnw/ctg/ bhaggita. htm
> 
> We know the above to be the truth.
> 
> And we know, that we are going there and are staying there beyond 
time.
> 
> M. Sufilight
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> 
> From: Martin 
> 
> To: theos-talk@yahoogro ups.com 
> 
> Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2009 10:43 PM
> 
> Subject: Re: Theos-World Was the psychic Blavatsky really right 
about the Catholic Church?"
> 
> I am not interested in those Mahatma's, Morten you didn't reply to 
my private message.
> 
> I am interested in the very core of humanity, the real men, not in 
some obscure Mahatma's.
> 
> And the interest goes both ways, since I have experiences with 
formless beings as well as formbeings, been on the sun, the moon etc. 
I have learned the powers of Nature but do not use them, I learned 
all ways of human existance and I care not...all I want to share is 
information no one else has. Till that day comes I'll be as cunning a 
human can be, untouchable and untracable. So I gave you both an 
invitation: no answer means the deal is off...and I'll go on. 
> 
> --- On Wed, 1/14/09, Frank Reitemeyer <dzyan@online. de> wrote:
> 
> From: Frank Reitemeyer <dzyan@online. de>
> 
> Subject: Re: Theos-World Was the psychic Blavatsky really right 
about the Catholic Church?"
> 
> To: theos-talk@yahoogro ups.com
> 
> Date: Wednesday, January 14, 2009, 10:16 PM
> 
> Morten, I would like to learn something about direct spiritual 
experiences from a direct source.
> 
> So far I remember I only once met a person with direct Mahatma 
contacts.
> 
> I thought your answers could be more authentic as to read about 
Mahatma contacts in books.
> 
> There is so much information about contacts with higher beings 
which are contradicting each other.
> 
> Therefore information and comparison is necessary.
> 
> So I am always interesting to hear about direct experiences to 
train my knowledge and my ability to get in touch with the Masters 
for myself.
> 
> I think, other Blavatsky students here, too as being in touch with 
a Master is better than reading books.
> 
> Of course I do not want to bring you in troubles in case there are 
restrictions to talk about your encounters.
> 
> Do they left artefacts for memorials? Olcott was given a shwal, 
which he always presented at conventions, if I remember right.
> 
> Frank
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> 
> From: Morten Nymann Olesen 
> 
> To: theos-talk@yahoogro ups.com 
> 
> Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2009 9:51 PM
> 
> Subject: Re: Theos-World Was the psychic Blavatsky really right 
about the Catholic Church?"
> 
> If I answer it could be a good idea. But for whom?
> 
> If I do not answer it could be an good idea. But for whom?
> 
> Oh dear, and we are as honest Seekers always bound to help us all 
forward.
> 
> What to do.
> 
> Let me ask, why do you want to know these things?
> 
> I and others are of course only allowed to help in accordance with 
our own and others Karmic situation.
> 
> M. Sufilight
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> 
> From: Frank Reitemeyer 
> 
> To: theos-talk@yahoogro ups.com 
> 
> Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2009 8:52 PM
> 
> Subject: Re: Theos-World Was the psychic Blavatsky really right 
about the Catholic Church?"
> 
> >No, together with the Initiates and Masters nearby.
> 
> Remember I have said more than one time, that I have meet them?
> 
> Yes, Morten, but I had more other fellow-students, co-workers etc. 
in mind.
> 
> Judge and also W. Emmett Small said something to the effect that in 
teh 21th 
> 
> century students are more or less have to stand on their own.
> 
> Masters are always around us, regardless whether we see them or not.
> 
> Yes, I remember you saying that you have met a Master, but can't 
remember at 
> 
> the moment whether it was KH or M or someone else.
> 
> Whom exactly did you met and how often?
> 
> Is it in the physical world or in the astral?
> 
> If a meeting is planned, is it then a one way or a two way 
situation (Can 
> 
> you from your side ask for a meeting?)
> 
> Do you receive orders what to do or what not do?
> 
> Did you get an outline of the dangerous world situation and did the 
Master 
> 
> explain you what mankind has to await now?
> 
> Thank you very much in advance.
> 
> Best from Berlin
> 
> Frank 
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> 
>  
> 
> 
>       Stay connected to the people that matter most with a smarter 
inbox. Take a look http://au.docs.yahoo.com/mail/smarterinbox
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>