Theos-Talk Archives (January 2009 Message tt00370)

Why???? To repeat like cows for the cows!
They will never do that and people are responsable for their own and 
need to take that responsability anddon't let that for ousiders
Christina









--- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, "Morten Nymann Olesen" <global-
theosophy@...> wrote:
>
> Why not?
> 
> There have been sage in past centuries.
> Why will they never come back?
> 
> 
> M. Sufilight
> 
>   ----- Original Message ----- 
>   From: christinaleestemaker 
>   To: theos-talk@yahoogroups.com 
>   Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2009 12:10 AM
>   Subject: Re: Theos-World Was the psychic Blavatsky really right 
about the Catholic Church?"
> 
> 
>   There are no mahatma's in contact with our fysical state of 
being!!!
>   They will not repeat, what they have done before.
> 
>   --- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, "Frank Reitemeyer" <dzyan@> 
>   wrote:
>   >
>   > Morten, I would like to learn something about direct spiritual 
>   experiences from a direct source.
>   > So far I remember I only once met a person with direct Mahatma 
>   contacts.
>   > I thought your answers could be more authentic as to read about 
>   Mahatma contacts in books.
>   > There is so much information about contacts with higher beings 
>   which are contradicting each other.
>   > Therefore information and comparison is necessary.
>   > 
>   > So I am always interesting to hear about direct experiences to 
>   train my knowledge and my ability to get in touch with the 
Masters 
>   for myself.
>   > I think, other Blavatsky students here, too as being in touch 
with 
>   a Master is better than reading books.
>   > 
>   > Of course I do not want to bring you in troubles in case there 
are 
>   restrictions to talk about your encounters.
>   > Do they left artefacts for memorials? Olcott was given a shwal, 
>   which he always presented at conventions, if I remember right.
>   > 
>   > Frank
>   > 
>   > ----- Original Message ----- 
>   > From: Morten Nymann Olesen 
>   > To: theos-talk@yahoogroups.com 
>   > Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2009 9:51 PM
>   > Subject: Re: Theos-World Was the psychic Blavatsky really right 
>   about the Catholic Church?"
>   > 
>   > 
>   > If I answer it could be a good idea. But for whom?
>   > If I do not answer it could be an good idea. But for whom?
>   > 
>   > Oh dear, and we are as honest Seekers always bound to help us 
all 
>   forward.
>   > What to do.
>   > 
>   > Let me ask, why do you want to know these things?
>   > I and others are of course only allowed to help in accordance 
with 
>   our own and others Karmic situation.
>   > 
>   > M. Sufilight
>   > 
>   > ----- Original Message ----- 
>   > From: Frank Reitemeyer 
>   > To: theos-talk@yahoogroups.com 
>   > Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2009 8:52 PM
>   > Subject: Re: Theos-World Was the psychic Blavatsky really right 
>   about the Catholic Church?"
>   > 
>   > >No, together with the Initiates and Masters nearby.
>   > Remember I have said more than one time, that I have meet them?
>   > 
>   > Yes, Morten, but I had more other fellow-students, co-workers 
etc. 
>   in mind.
>   > Judge and also W. Emmett Small said something to the effect 
that in 
>   teh 21th 
>   > century students are more or less have to stand on their own.
>   > Masters are always around us, regardless whether we see them or 
not.
>   > 
>   > Yes, I remember you saying that you have met a Master, but 
can't 
>   remember at 
>   > the moment whether it was KH or M or someone else.
>   > Whom exactly did you met and how often?
>   > Is it in the physical world or in the astral?
>   > If a meeting is planned, is it then a one way or a two way 
>   situation (Can 
>   > you from your side ask for a meeting?)
>   > Do you receive orders what to do or what not do?
>   > Did you get an outline of the dangerous world situation and did 
the 
>   Master 
>   > explain you what mankind has to await now?
>   > 
>   > Thank you very much in advance.
>   > 
>   > Best from Berlin
>   > Frank 
>   > 
>   > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>   > 
>   > 
>   > 
>   > 
>   > 
>   > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>   >
> 
> 
> 
>    
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>