Re: Theos-World Was the psychic Blavatsky really right about the Catholic Church?"
Jan 15, 2009 09:59 AM
by Morten Nymann Olesen
What is a fantasy to some is the Akasha to others.
Being one with ParaBrahm is being one with transcended compassion.
None is one with ParaBrahm without being one with the Akasha.
But if you hate being one, it is your choice.
One is one with all future, and another is not.
M. Sufilight
----- Original Message -----
From: Martin
To: theos-talk@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2009 6:37 PM
Subject: Re: Theos-World Was the psychic Blavatsky really right about the Catholic Church?"
Dear Morten:
I am always interested in Ainsophy and this forum and its members. Accused of being a fantast by so many people I can say The Bhagavat Gita is as much a fantasy as is the Bible or anything written or said about beings who didn't sign the end book. This is why R. Steiner wanted to have him mentioned when quoting his works, and this is why I keep my own life as my own fantasy without being solepsistic ( no lonely whale here ) and have ordered my bookkeeper not to spread my whole story as of yet. And what do I need Akasha for? If I recollect my own life and search deep, I find sollutions to problems that havent even happened yet in this time on this plane of existance...
Everyone has his or hers story to tell and by the exchange of experiences especially in a forum like this, we can focus ourselves without words, forms or any of the outward sensual on That which lives in all of us: a causeless cause, born from the Void, blooming and returning into it. Accepting Nature to be the only master, and not just Earth's Nature!
--- On Thu, 1/15/09, Morten Nymann Olesen <global-theosophy@stofanet.dk> wrote:
From: Morten Nymann Olesen <global-theosophy@stofanet.dk>
Subject: Re: Theos-World Was the psychic Blavatsky really right about the Catholic Church?"
To: theos-talk@yahoogroups.com
Date: Thursday, January 15, 2009, 5:50 PM
Dear friends and Martin
My views are:
I take it, that You are not interested in theosophy and the members at this forum?
Please understand Frank talked about being "lonely Wolves".
I therefore sought to tell him, that we were not alone.
Sure, The core is ParaBrahm.
The Manvantara dissolves and Pralaya is.
If it is possible for me to be more helpful to you I would recommend you to contemplate the following quote and the inner essence of it - if possible for you - in the Akasha version of the Bhagavad Gita.
(Try Bhagavad Gita by Sir Edwin Arnold, Chapter 8,
v16-22)
"The worlds, Arjuna! -- even Brahma's world --
Roll back again from Death to Life's unrest;
But they, O Kunti's Son! that reach to Me,
Taste birth no more. If ye know Brahma's Day
Which is a thousand Yugas; if ye know
The thousand Yugas making Brahma's Night,
Then know ye Day and Night as He doth know!
When that vast Dawn doth break, th' Invisible
Is brought anew into the Visible;
When that deep Night doth darken, all which is
Fades back again to Him Who sent it forth;
Yea! this vast company of living things --
Again and yet again produced -- expires
At Brahma's Nightfall; and, at Brahma's Dawn,
Riseth, without its will, to life new-born.
But -- higher, deeper, innermost -- abides
Another Life, not like the life of sense,
Escaping sight, unchanging. This endures
When all created things have passed away;
This is that Life named the Unmanifest,
The Infinite! the All! the Uttermost.
Thither arriving none return. That Life
Is Mine, and I am there! And, Prince! by faith
Which wanders not, there is a way to come
Thither. I, the PURUSHA, I Who spread
The Universe around me -- in Whom dwell
All living Things -- may so be reached and seen!"
http://www.theosoph y-nw.org/ theosnw/ctg/ bhaggita. htm
We know the above to be the truth.
And we know, that we are going there and are staying there beyond time.
M. Sufilight
----- Original Message -----
From: Martin
To: theos-talk@yahoogro ups.com
Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2009 10:43 PM
Subject: Re: Theos-World Was the psychic Blavatsky really right about the Catholic Church?"
I am not interested in those Mahatma's, Morten you didn't reply to my private message.
I am interested in the very core of humanity, the real men, not in some obscure Mahatma's.
And the interest goes both ways, since I have experiences with formless beings as well as formbeings, been on the sun, the moon etc. I have learned the powers of Nature but do not use them, I learned all ways of human existance and I care not...all I want to share is information no one else has. Till that day comes I'll be as cunning a human can be, untouchable and untracable. So I gave you both an invitation: no answer means the deal is off...and I'll go on.
--- On Wed, 1/14/09, Frank Reitemeyer <dzyan@online. de> wrote:
From: Frank Reitemeyer <dzyan@online. de>
Subject: Re: Theos-World Was the psychic Blavatsky really right about the Catholic Church?"
To: theos-talk@yahoogro ups.com
Date: Wednesday, January 14, 2009, 10:16 PM
Morten, I would like to learn something about direct spiritual experiences from a direct source.
So far I remember I only once met a person with direct Mahatma contacts.
I thought your answers could be more authentic as to read about Mahatma contacts in books.
There is so much information about contacts with higher beings which are contradicting each other.
Therefore information and comparison is necessary.
So I am always interesting to hear about direct experiences to train my knowledge and my ability to get in touch with the Masters for myself.
I think, other Blavatsky students here, too as being in touch with a Master is better than reading books.
Of course I do not want to bring you in troubles in case there are restrictions to talk about your encounters.
Do they left artefacts for memorials? Olcott was given a shwal, which he always presented at conventions, if I remember right.
Frank
----- Original Message -----
From: Morten Nymann Olesen
To: theos-talk@yahoogro ups.com
Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2009 9:51 PM
Subject: Re: Theos-World Was the psychic Blavatsky really right about the Catholic Church?"
If I answer it could be a good idea. But for whom?
If I do not answer it could be an good idea. But for whom?
Oh dear, and we are as honest Seekers always bound to help us all forward.
What to do.
Let me ask, why do you want to know these things?
I and others are of course only allowed to help in accordance with our own and others Karmic situation.
M. Sufilight
----- Original Message -----
From: Frank Reitemeyer
To: theos-talk@yahoogro ups.com
Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2009 8:52 PM
Subject: Re: Theos-World Was the psychic Blavatsky really right about the Catholic Church?"
>No, together with the Initiates and Masters nearby.
Remember I have said more than one time, that I have meet them?
Yes, Morten, but I had more other fellow-students, co-workers etc. in mind.
Judge and also W. Emmett Small said something to the effect that in teh 21th
century students are more or less have to stand on their own.
Masters are always around us, regardless whether we see them or not.
Yes, I remember you saying that you have met a Master, but can't remember at
the moment whether it was KH or M or someone else.
Whom exactly did you met and how often?
Is it in the physical world or in the astral?
If a meeting is planned, is it then a one way or a two way situation (Can
you from your side ask for a meeting?)
Do you receive orders what to do or what not do?
Did you get an outline of the dangerous world situation and did the Master
explain you what mankind has to await now?
Thank you very much in advance.
Best from Berlin
Frank
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[Back to Top]
Theosophy World:
Dedicated to the Theosophical Philosophy and its Practical Application
