Re: Taking offense, seeking revenge
Jan 11, 2009 04:01 PM
by nhcareyta
Dear Raquel
Thank you for your words of support and encouragement
to all seekers after Truth.
Thank you too for posting Erica's talk again.
I have been away and missed it.
It is a profound and insightful piece to me too.
Kindest regards
Nigel
--- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, Raquel Rodríguez <raquel_rpj@...>
wrote:
>
> Nigel
>
> Thanks for your kind words
> I am just an undisciplined shellfish student, that fortunately for
some reason, has an special sharp eye to intuitively recognize Truth.
And intuition that I have learn to trust thanks to the untiring work
of many true theosophist on this forum.
> So sincerely thanks to the common sense and Love For Truth that you
and many others devote and work for.
>
> A few weeks ago, when involved on discussions about divisions on
TS, Erika posted a beautiful statement, that I like to meditate upon
from time to time and I would now like to recall.
> Keep the link unbroken by Erika Letzerich.
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/theos-talk/message/47636
>
> Very Best Regards
>
>
> Raquel
>
>
> --- El dom, 11/1/09, nhcareyta <nhcareyta@...> escribió:
>
> De: nhcareyta <nhcareyta@...>
> Asunto: Theos-World Re: Taking offense, seeking revenge
> Para: theos-talk@yahoogroups.com
> Fecha: domingo, 11 enero, 2009 1:40
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Dear Raquel
>
> Thank you very much for your response.
>
> Your words are steeped in wisdom to me as you highlight
> some painful moral dilemmas so well.
>
> You write, "I have been highly appreciating this didactic labor
> from some members on this forum and I understand it is
> necessary to keep doing for the newcomers and I am
> even sorry, this constant tiring work keeps being necessary."
>
> Thank you for being one of the first to recognise and appreciate
> the necessity of this "tiring" and very unpleasant task.
>
> When I first joined the Adyar Theosophical Society I was guided
> towards Bishop Leadbeater's works and found their romanticism
> and simplicity appealing.
> Moreover, many seemingly knowledgeable senior members sang
> his praises and, based on their trusted recommendation, I avidly
> read his books together with his followers' such as Dr Besant
> and Geoffrey Hodson.
>
> After much further research, study and certain experiences,
> and despite my mind's initial resistance, Bishop Leadbeater's many
> betrayals and untruths and particularly their extraordinary
> ramifications became overwhelmingly obvious.
>
> It was a painful experience as I had mostly blindly trusted others
> on matters I could not prove for myself at that time.
>
> As a Theosophical course producer and group facilitator, I
> subsequently felt a deep responsibility to make known these
> facts to those students and seekers who had not done any
> research or made the comparisons between Bishop Leadbeater's
> writings and the teachings of Madame Blavatsky and her teachers.
>
> You write, "Still sometimes it gets more like a war and I think
> this energy corrupts the main aim, witch is to preserve Truth from
> contamination. However in this case and again unlikely, war is
> better than silence."
>
> Herein lies the eternal dilemma.
>
> As budding theosophists, most of us are striving for "Truth"
> through study, practice and by being as accepting, non-judgemental,
> compassionate, non-aggressive and indeed non-violent as possible.
> But can one "preserve Truth" as you say, ie. love, compassion,
> wisdom, truthfulness, genuine knowledge etc by not confronting
> misrepresentations and deliberate lies?
> Through doing nothing are we not actually perpetuating these?
> The paraphrased saying "evil happens when good men do nothing"
> seems entirely appropriate in this situation, most especially where
> new seekers after truth are in their most vulnerable and trusting
> state.
>
> It gives me no pleasure at all to constantly bring these
> issues to the attention of newcomers. My emotions often feel dirty
> and unsettled when so doing.
> However in this special case and very unfortunately, as you say
> with, to me very insightful words, "war is better than
> silence."
> At least it is the honest thing to do.
>
> Thank you again Raquel.
>
> Kind regards
> Nigel
>
> --- In theos-talk@yahoogro ups.com, Raquel Rodríguez
<raquel_rpj@ ...>
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Nigel
> >
> > Your statement, sounds pure common sense to me.
> > However, I myself would rather desire that the name of leadbeater
> does not get confused with Theosophy, as I do not think is the same
> thing. To me it is clearly the seed of perversion of the Truth,
> generously given from the founders.
> > Still, his work would be recommended, by members of the society,
> for reasons far beyond my comprehension, this can not be avoided
> unlikely. I do not belong to the TS, but I understand it´s
importance
> and it´s preservation is necessary.
> > I have been highly appreciating this didactic labor from some
> members on this forum and I understand it is necessary to keep
doing
> for the newcomers and I am even sorry, this constant tiring work
> keeps being necessary.
> > Still sometimes it gets more like a war and I think this energy
> corrupts the main aim, witch is to preserve Truth from
contamination.
> However in this case and again unlikely, war is better than
silence.
> >
> > Best Regards and Thank you
> >
> > Raquel
> >
> > --- El sáb, 10/1/09, nhcareyta <nhcareyta@ ..> escribió:
> >
> > De: nhcareyta <nhcareyta@ ..>
> > Asunto: Theos-World Re: Taking offense, seeking revenge
> > Para: theos-talk@yahoogro ups.com
> > Fecha: sábado, 10 enero, 2009 12:46
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Dear Paul, Morten and All
> >
> > Morten, your strong views desiring to stop production and sales
> > of the works of Bishop Leadbeater are well stated.
> >
> > Paul, you write, "Taking people's books away from them, even
> > when I think their books are silly fantasies, goes against my
grain
> > after thirty years as a public librarian. Leadbeater and Bailey
no
> > worse than a lot of other authors, sad to say."
> >
> > My position with this highly contentious issue has always been
one
> > concerning truth and credibility rather than outright censorship.
> >
> > It is well recognised by all but blind devotees that Bishop
> Leadbeater
> > was a pathological liar and sexual deviant. Newcomers need only
> take
> > these comments and read through previous theostalk postings via
> > yahoo's search engine to verify for themselves the veracity of
this
> > statement.
> >
> > Surely the question we must all ask is, in whom do we place our
> > confidence in matters spiritual and occult, where we feel
ourselves
> > in need of direction and support?
> >
> > If it is well known that a particular author has the credentials
of
> > Bishop Leadbeater, a spiritual organization publishing and
> promoting
> > his works has a bounden duty to inform its visitors and members
of
> > the facts surrounding this man.
> >
> > From my perspective, to not so do constitutes a gross violation
of
> > truth and trust.
> >
> > To my knowledge, Dr Besant, Alice Bailey, George Arundale and
> > Sri Ram were neither pathological liars nor sexual deviants,
> although
> > some of these and others were certainly "parasitical and
> delusional"
> > to quote Paul.
> > Indeed they were perhaps only guilty of blindly following some of
> > Bishop Leadbeater's teachings, with the exception of Sri Ram
later
> in
> > his presidency.
> >
> > For those who find constant repetition of these issues tiresome
> > and perhaps non-productive, please note there are numerous
> > new members to theostalk each week, including those belonging
> > to the Adyar Theosophical Society.
> >
> > They, like myself many years ago, might like to hear about the
> > deceptions and betrayals which followed Madame Blavatsky's
> > passing.
> > Some in the Adyar Theosophical Society hierarchy might profess
> > freedom of thought and "No Religion Higher Than Truth" but when
> > one attempts to compare and criticise the works of Bishop
> > Leadbeater and his clones strong pressures are often brought to
> > bear on the transgressor.
> >
> > Freedom in its purest form permits the liberty to think, speak
and
> > write however one chooses within due bounds of legality and
> > decorum.
> > It should not be used to suppress debate or to protect a cult's
> > dogma as often occurred, from my experience, by some leading
> > members of the Adyar Theosophical Society.
> >
> > The Society performs an important function in today's world where
> > prejudice and hardening of attitudes is becoming increasingly
> > pervasive.
> > However it can greatly improve its role by simply being more open
> > and honest about some of its teachers and their teachings.
> >
> > Regards
> > Nigel
> >
> > --- In theos-talk@yahoogro ups.com, "kpauljohnson"
> <kpauljohnson@ ...>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Dear Morten,
> > >
> > > Thanks for your comments. You know I agree 100% with you about
> the
> > > value of the writings of Bailey and Leadbeater compared to
those
> of
> > > HPB. One reason I don't want to belong to the TS is because
there
> > > are so many competing versions of reality, the ES, LCC, etc., a
> > > chaotic cacaphony of voices. But somehow from outside it I can
> > > accept that it was destined to be what it is, and try to be a
> > > wellwisher to all factions and individuals in it. Taking
people's
> > > books away from them, even when I think their books are silly
> > > fantasies, goes against my grain after thirty years as a public
> > > librarian. Leadbeater and Bailey no worse than a lot of other
> > > authors, sad to say.
> > >
> > > I'd rather put my energy into recommending other authors like
> > > Hardinge-Britten, Bunsen, Burton, Aurobindo, who tie
meaningfully
> > > into the work of HPB, than worry about discouraging people from
> > > reading authors whose books are connected with hers in a
> > parasitical
> > > and delusional way.
> > >
> > > You know who I mean :) but let's not denounce them,
> > >
> > > Paul
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --- In theos-talk@yahoogro ups.com, "Morten Nymann Olesen"
> <global-
> > > theosophy@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Dear Paul and friends
> > > >
> > > > My views are:
> > > >
> > > > I am happy to read this email.
> > > >
> > > > My views are, that I myself aught to be better at formulating
> > > myself, so not to be disrespectuful to those who for some
reasons
> > are
> > > lacking the open compassionate heart, that makes them immune in
> > > letting themselves being hurt when reading disrespectful words
> > > written in e-mails.
> > > > I will work on it.
> > > >
> > > > I will how ever also refer to what H. P. Blavatsky said in
the
> > book
> > > The Key to Theosophy.
> > > > Because it is here I find a great difference between
> theosophists
> > > and a great number of those would-be spiritual groups around
the
> > > globe.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > H. P. Blavatsky said in the Key to Theosophy:
> > > >
> > > > "IS IT NECESSARY TO PRAY?
> > > >
> > > > ENQUIRER. Do you believe in prayer, and do you ever pray?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > THEOSOPHIST. We do not. We ACT, instead of talking."
> > > >
> > > > http://www.phx- ult-lodge. org/aKEY. htm#p66
> > > >
> > > > The word is emphasized by me and HPB.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > M. Sufilight
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > From: kpauljohnson
> > > > To: theos-talk@yahoogro ups.com
> > > > Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2009 10:23 PM
> > > > Subject: Theos-World Taking offense, seeking revenge
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Greetings.
> > > >
> > > > During the runup to the November election, an article
appeared
> > in
> > > > Slate that made me think of Theosophists:
> > > > http://www.slate. com/id/2202303/
> > > >
> > > > Not just the regular dustups here at theos-talk, but also the
> > > latest
> > > > organizational brouhaha in Adyar and Wheston, reminds me that
> > > > Theosophists are extraordinarily disrespectful to one
another.
> > > Not
> > > > just those in one organization attacking those in another,
but
> > > within
> > > > the Adyar TS even more so. I wonder if people realize just
what
> > > kind
> > > > of impression of the entire movement is created when people
> > snark
> > > one
> > > > another in a public forum like this. Bad enough when mere
> > members
> > > do
> > > > so; far worse when an elected national leader makes a big
> > display
> > > of
> > > > arrogance and aggression.
> > > >
> > > > Yet at the local level over two decades I never noticed any
> > > > difficulty whatsoever for Theosophists agreeing to disagree.
> > > There
> > > > was always a great diversity of views in any group I ever
> > > attended,
> > > > in several states. And no one to my recollection got all
> > offended
> > > > that someone else had a different estimation of various
> > authors.
> > > But
> > > > at the national and international levels there seems to be
far
> > > less
> > > > of that live-and-let- live attitude. I renewed my TSA
> membership
> > > > after a ten-year lapse in 2008, but was hugely relieved to
see
> > it
> > > > expire last week.
> > > >
> > > > The conclusion of the linked article is worth considering
here.
> > > > The "empty boats" notion would be well applied to most of the
> > > > disputes here. Simply to express one's opinion is to risk
> > > personally
> > > > offending someone else, even if there was no such intention.
> > And
> > > the
> > > > person thus unintentionally offended will often deliberately
> > > > retaliate with a personal attack, as if the other person's
> > > opinion
> > > > somehow invades their personal space.
> > > >
> > > > Like any body of literature, the Theosophical writings
contain
> > > mixed
> > > > messages. You can use HPB the same way Christians use the
> > Bible,
> > > to
> > > > justify both sides of every dispute. Pedro's quote indicates
> > that
> > > it
> > > > is untheosophical to take offense at differing views and seek
> > > revenge
> > > > on those who express them. Morten's quote indicates that it
is
> > a
> > > > theosophical duty to do so. HPB said both; you choose which
HPB
> > > to
> > > > emulate.
> > > >
> > > > PJ
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
[Back to Top]
Theosophy World:
Dedicated to the Theosophical Philosophy and its Practical Application