Theos-Talk Archives (January 2009 Message tt00035)

Dear friends and Zaitzev

My views are:
I will certainly not quote all the Alice A. Bailey book in an e-mail to prove you wrong.
Just have a look at the online editions. There are no words about them being "first editions".
It is you who need to prove it to be otherwise by quoting, what I tell you is not there to be found.

Even "A Treatise on Cosmic Fire" have had added several footnotes in various translations and as far as I hear from others also in the online editions.

But why not add, what edition Problems of Humanity is? Why hide it?
And I keep hearing you agree upon that Alice A. Bailey is political and not non-political as H. P. Blavatsky and Morya was. Is that true?



M. Sufilight


  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Konstantin Zaitzev 
  To: theos-talk@yahoogroups.com 
  Sent: Saturday, January 03, 2009 9:50 PM
  Subject: Theos-World Re: TS Adyar's policy or non-policy?


  --- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, "Morten Nymann Olesen"
  <global-theosophy@...> wrote:

  > And ALL of them First editions? I doubt that! 
  > It is for instance - as far as I am aware - not written anywhere
  online, that the book "Problems of Humanity" have seen several editions..

  Doubt isn't enough. Prove that. Some of the books, at least, look like
  facsimile copies with old typeface, for example "Treatise on cosmic
  fire". Though I admit that such books as "Problems of Humanity" could
  be updated as they deal with politics.



   

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]