theos-talk.com

[MASTER INDEX] [DATE INDEX] [THREAD INDEX] [SUBJECT INDEX] [AUTHOR INDEX]

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: Theos-World Re: [Modern Cosmology ] Re: Cyclic Model vs. Big Bang

Dec 17, 2008 10:19 AM
by Augoeides-222


Leon,
  Thanks. I have two Science Discoveries that might be of interest:

Rocks Evolve Too, geologists clain Properties

>>>http://www.nationalpost.com/news/story.html?id=992895<<<

A New Fifth  Magnetic Envelope of Earth Discovered

>>>http://www.spacedaily.com/reports/Biggest_Breach_Of_Earth_Solar_Storm_Shield_Discovered_999.html

Regards,
John



-------------- Original message -------------- 
From: Leon Maurer <leonmaurer@aol.com> 

On Nov 25, 2008, at 11/25/083:29 PM, macromitch wrote:

> --- In moderncosmology@yahoogroups.com, "Rachel" 
> <dustballdustball@...>
> wrote:
>>
>> As of recently, I finished "Endless Universe:[...]--Rewriting Cosmic
>> History," (I think I recall someone suggesting the book on this site;
>> if so, thank you) a book pitting Big Bang and cyclic model together
>> and giving insight into this up-and-coming theory. The book was
>> captivating, informative and full, yet relatable. But I digress....
>>
>> What I intended was to start a discussion on the two. Which of the
>> two do you think is the better theory and why (I support cyclic
>> model more myself)?
>>
>
> Cosmologists observe spatial expansion accelerating. This implies an
> infinite future and there is no crunch ahead. If there is no crunch
> ahead there can be no prior universe that collapsed.

But, if the universe expands so far that all its forms dissipate and 
dissolve back into the aether from whence they came -- then all their 
formative information will still remain in the higher order 
hyperspace fields until they dissolve back into their zero-point spin 
momentum origins -- the source of all cyclic laws governing universal 
electrodynamics.

Thus, the entire cosmos would eventually have returned to its 
"singularity" origin -- with all its structural information intact. 
If such is the case, then, at the end of a certain period of cyclic 
rest, the cosmos could reanimate into a cosmogenesis similar to the 
original start of the present cosmos.** This would imply that cosmic 
consciousness, as an aspect of the unconditioned Aether, would use 
its awakened will to impel the new emanation, fractal involution, and 
ultimate big bang, inflation, and evolution on the lowest order 
physical/material level of overall spacetime.

IOW, the cosmos along with the physical universe -- with all its 
galaxies, stars, planets, sentient beings, down to the fundamental 
sub quantum and quantum particles -- would all have to be analogously 
cyclic in nature... And, periodically come in and out of existence at 
whatever frequency level they each exist on. In parallel, rach 
individual phenomenal consciousness would also periodically come in 
and out of existence as living beings, along their evolutionary paths 
toward higher and higher perfected degrees of perception, thought, 
understanding, response, knowledge and experience. The driving force 
of all such "creative evolution" being the will of consciousness 
empowered by desire to experience and learn. What better way than 
for the cosmic consciousness to split itself up into infinite 
varieties of multiple levels of sentient beings -- from cellular 
biota to humans (made up of cellular bioya:), and perhaps even 
through other higher order angels and god-like or devilish beings 
living and experiencing in hyperspace (along, perhaps, with our 
spiritually awakened dead friends and family waiting for rebirth.) ;-).

Leon Maurer

**http://canonizer.com/topic.asp/23/13
http://www.tellworld.com/Astro.Biological.Coenergetics/
>
> Mitch Raemsch
>

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


 

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


           

[Back to Top]


Theosophy World: Dedicated to the Theosophical Philosophy and its Practical Application