Theos-Talk Archives (December 2008 Message tt00239)

Of course, the little-bit scientists imagine that such concepts only 
have to do with the theoretical nature of sub-atomic quanta, and that 
all of these ideas have nothing to do with what we as humans 
experience on our levels of being.  What could theoretical physics 
have to do with the psychology of consciousness or the heart, or with 
the idea that human beings are such multidimensional beings 
themselves?with zero point origins! 
       Perhaps the number three is inherent to the geometization of 
the world, like the number seven ?with the underlying seven 
dimensional strings and seven dimensional hyperspace!  Certainly, if 
we consider the newest advances in modern physics as to the ultimate 
nature and constitution of quanta, and the universe, we are led to 
utterly awesome and inspired concepts?all related to what can be 
described as `zero point dynamics.'  It seems that, as Blavatsky 
says, the Gods and other invisible bodies clothed themselves in 
bodies, founded upon "material points without extension"?or zero 
points.  These newest ideas in superstring and M-theory are indeed 
most in keeping with the ancient wisdom teaching of Blavatsky's 
Secret Doctrine.   Quanta, like the universe, have zero point 
foundations.







--- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, "Richard Semock" <semockr@...> 
wrote:
>
> What he also said:
> 
> The God Particle of Leon Maurer - a contemporary 'Einstein of 
> Mysticism' 
> "Each individual human consciousness is simply a zero-point of 
> awareness(at the source and center of its triune Monad) reflecting 
> directly from,and entangled with the initial zero-point of initial 
> Cosmic awareness.
> 
> " ... in my ABC theory, ... we start from the dimensionless zero-
> point and its abstract motion or "spinergy," and trace its 
> essentially spherical expansion in a completely logical 
progression, 
> through the transcendental hyperspace dimensions, as they fractally 
> involve down and, after breaking their symmetry, finally evolve to 
> the 4-D space (3 metric dimensions plus time) we experience. And, 
> eventually, end up with something similar to Superstring/M-brane 
> theory?but coming to it from the opposite direction."  (Maurer, 
theos-
> talk@yahoogroups.com, Jan.2004)
> 
> http://www.zeropoint.ca/ZeropointDynamics.htm
> 
> --- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, "Richard Semock" <semockr@> 
> wrote:
> >
> > What he said!
> > 
> > --- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, Leon Maurer <leonmaurer@> 
wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Cass,
> > > 
> > > Yes, I think we've already broken through the last barrier 
> toward  
> > > fulfilling HPB's prophesy in the very near future.  (Perhaps 
this 
> > is  
> > > the great new change that the Mayan calendar has been telling 
us 
> > is  
> > > coming around 2012... Not an end, but a beginning. ;-)
> > > 
> > > The final proof will come when the ABC model can be 
demonstrated 
> > as  
> > > fact beyond a shadow of a doubt.  Already research is being 
> > planned  
> > > that will demonstrate, so everyone can see and experience it, 
> that  
> > > the universe is a hologram, and what we can know of it is 
already 
> > in  
> > > our higher mind...  Pretty much the way HPB described it (if 
you 
> > can  
> > > read the SD "in and around the words and between the lines" and 
> > cut  
> > > through all the "blinds").
> > > 
> > > As for the previous universe and pralaya...
> > > 
> > > All that it requires, is for the universe to continue to expand 
--
>   
> > > and lose entropy -- until everything in it dissolves back into 
> the  
> > > aether or absolute space... With total metric space and its 
mass- 
> > > energy "particles" and their forms compacting into infinite 
zero- 
> > > (laya) points of spin momentum or "abstract motion" (while 
still  
> > > containing all the information as holographic wave 
interference  
> > > patterns)... While that aether, which in its overall nature is 
> like 
> > a  
> > > "Bose Einstein Condensate" (see wikipedia.com) remains ONE 
> > thing...  
> > > "Whose center, when manifest, is everywhere and circumference 
> > nowhere".
> > > 
> > > That "total space" (as Einstein called it) is the cosmic  
> > > "singularity" that reflects itself in every potentially 
> conscious  
> > > black hole at the center of every universal form -- whose 
still  
> > > center, at absolute zero, during pralaya, is pure (sleeping)  
> > > potential cosmic consciousness and potential matter... Ready to 
> > wake  
> > > up again and go through another cosmogenesis, until we all 
> > reappear  
> > > in the new cycle of life, to further evolve on a higher plane, 
> and  
> > > take up where we left off in the previous manvantara ;-)  See:
> > > http://www.leonmaurer.info/ABCimages/evolution2.gif
> > > Note that the fractal involved field model of cosmogenesis  
> > > analogously applies to the physical universe as well as all 
the  
> > > galaxies and other forms of mass-energy, on down through our 
> solar  
> > > system and planet, to the fundamental particles (spherical 
> > standing  
> > > waves) of light. See:
> > > (head on cross section of a single spherically polarized photon)
> > > http://www.leonmaurer.info/ABCimages/PhotonField.gif
> > > And compare to: (cosmogenesis at the third Logos)
> > > http://www.leonmaurer.info/ABCimages/Chakrafield-spherical-
> col_3.jpg
> > > 
> > > For an interesting take on this, see Feynman's talk about light:
> > > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FjHJ7FmV0M4
> > > 
> > > All that -- putting together Einstein's general relativity, 
> > Feynman's  
> > > quantum electrodynamics, Bohm-Pribram's' holographic paradigm, 
> > Kaluza- 
> > > Klien-Greene-Witten-Kaku's string and membrane physics -- 
> > certainly  
> > > is "scientific"... And, all of it totally consistent with the 
> ABC  
> > > model of cosmogenesis, based solely on the formulas in the Book 
> of  
> > > Dzyan, as explained by HPB.
> > > 
> > > Then, when pralaya is over (as the modern scientific pundits  
> > > speculate from their mathematics) -- the infinite new 
universes  
> > > (galaxies, solar systems, planets, bacteria, plants, animals, 
> > humans,  
> > > etc,) spring up everywhere in their time and place, like spray 
in 
> > an  
> > > ocean of waves... "As above, so below' and."The  microcosm(s) 
> (is/ 
> > > are) the mirror(s) of the macrocosm" (as the ancient 
philosopher/ 
> > > scientist pundits say;-).
> > > 
> > > So, the cosmos (like every universe) and every composite form, 
> or  
> > > particle-wave in it, is a hologram -- within even larger 
> holograms -
> > -  
> > > ad infinitum.  And, as the Buddhist and Vedic philosophers 
> > say. "All  
> > > is Maya" or illusion.  (But, this cannot be "scientific," even 
> > though  
> > > actual -- since conventional science can only deal with the 
> > physical/ 
> > > material or measurable universe).  So, what we need is a new  
> > > scientific paradigm -- which we might call "philosophical 
> science" 
> > or  
> > > "scientific philosophy" or maybe just plain "theosophy". ;-)
> > > 
> > > Best wishes,
> > > Leon Maurer
> > > http://canonizer.com/topic.asp/23/13 (NEW)
> > > http://www.tellworld.com/Astro.Biological.Coenergetics/
> > > 
> > > 
> > > On Dec 14, 2008, at 12/14/088:48 PM, Cass Silva wrote:
> > > 
> > > > Hi Leon
> > > >
> > > > Science has finally come around to what HPB said 100 years 
> ago.   
> > > > Still the problem remains - from where the previous universe 
- 
> I  
> > > > guess Pralaya wouldn't explain it as it is a non-scientific  
> > > > concept.  Did HPB mention anything about conditions during 
> > Pralaya?
> > > >
> > > > Cass
> > > >
> > > > ps  Just listened to a doco on Steven Hawking - he agrees 
with  
> > > > Greene's theory of multi-dimensional vibration strings 
(rather 
> > than  
> > > > particles) and says it explains why gravity is weaker in our 
3  
> > > > dimensions because it has travelled through 8 others.  They 
> are  
> > > > more or less stating that Quantum Mechanics explains gravity 
at 
> > the  
> > > > quantum level ( at the smallest) and marries it with 
Relativity 
> > (at  
> > > > the largest) and Hawkings Black Hole Theory
> > > >
> > > > If I understood it correctly they cannot explain what they 
> call  
> > > > 'the singularity' other than to say the symmetry was broken 
and 
> > are  
> > > > now toying with the idea of universes not unlike particles, 
> just  
> > > > popping in and out of existence!   And this from the greatest 
> > minds  
> > > > of modern science.
> > > >
> > > > Cass
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ________________________________
> > > > From: Leon Maurer <leonmaurer@>
> > > > To: jcs-online Study forum <jcs-online@yahoogroups.com>
> > > > Sent: Sunday, 14 December, 2008 6:09:51 PM
> > > > Subject: Theos-World Did our cosmos exist before the big bang?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Did our cosmos exist before the big bang?
> > > >
> > > > http://www.newscien tist.com/ article/mg200268 61.500-did- 
our-
> > cosmos-
> > > > exist-before- the-big-bang. html?DCMP= NLC-nletter&  
> > > > nsref=mg20026861 .500
> > > >
> > > > http://tinyurl. com/5tkvfb
> > > >
> > > > Very likely -- if the ABC fractal involved holographic field 
> > model of
> > > > periodic cosmogenesis is correct.
> > > >
> > > > Leon Maurer
> > > > http://canonizer. com/topic. asp/23/13
> > > > "Note: This canonizer topic ("HARD PROBLEM") enables us to 
> > directly
> > > > compare theories and models of consciousness and its 
> > interconnections
> > > > with mind, memory, brain, body, senses, etc.. If you agree 
with 
> > the
> > > > ABC theory of cosmogenesis -- postulating consciousness as an 
a
> > > > priori quality of ubiquitous absolute space (or any other 
> > reasonable
> > > > theory) please feel free to sign on to add your support or, 
if 
> you
> > > > have anything to add or contribute to the topic, or wish to 
> post 
> > your
> > > > own theory, open a new sub-camp or camp statement."
> > > > http://www.tellworl d.com/Astro. Biological. Coenergetics/
> > > >
> > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > > >
> > > 
> > > 
> > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > >
> >
>