Theos-Talk Archives (December 2008 Message tt00235)

On Nov 25, 2008, at 11/25/083:29 PM, macromitch wrote:

> --- In moderncosmology@yahoogroups.com, "Rachel"  
> <dustballdustball@...>
> wrote:
>>
>>  As of recently, I finished "Endless Universe:[...]--Rewriting Cosmic
>> History," (I think I recall someone suggesting the book on this site;
>> if so, thank you) a book pitting Big Bang and cyclic model together
>> and giving insight into this up-and-coming theory. The book was
>> captivating, informative and full, yet relatable. But I digress....
>>
>> What I intended was to start a discussion on the two. Which of the
>> two do you think is the better theory and why (I support cyclic
>> model more myself)?
>>
>
> Cosmologists observe spatial expansion accelerating. This implies an
> infinite future and there is no crunch ahead. If there is no crunch
> ahead there can be no prior universe that collapsed.

But, if the universe expands so far that all its forms dissipate and  
dissolve back into the aether from whence they came -- then all their  
formative information will still remain in the higher order  
hyperspace fields until they dissolve back into their zero-point spin  
momentum origins -- the source of all cyclic laws governing universal  
electrodynamics.

Thus, the entire cosmos would eventually have returned to its  
"singularity" origin -- with all its structural information intact.   
If such is the case, then, at the end of a certain period of cyclic  
rest, the cosmos could reanimate into a cosmogenesis similar to the  
original start of the present cosmos.**  This would imply that cosmic  
consciousness, as an aspect of the unconditioned Aether, would use  
its awakened will to impel the new emanation, fractal involution, and  
ultimate big bang, inflation, and evolution on the lowest order  
physical/material level of overall spacetime.

IOW, the cosmos along with the physical universe -- with all its  
galaxies, stars, planets, sentient beings, down to the fundamental  
sub quantum and quantum particles -- would all have to be analogously  
cyclic in nature... And, periodically come in and out of existence at  
whatever frequency level they each exist on.  In parallel, rach  
individual phenomenal consciousness would also periodically come in  
and out of existence as living beings, along their evolutionary paths  
toward higher and higher perfected degrees of perception, thought,  
understanding, response, knowledge and experience.  The driving force  
of all such "creative evolution" being the will of consciousness  
empowered by desire to experience and learn.  What better way than  
for the cosmic consciousness to split itself up into infinite  
varieties of multiple levels of sentient beings -- from cellular  
biota to humans (made up of cellular bioya:), and perhaps even  
through other higher order angels and god-like or devilish beings  
living and experiencing in hyperspace (along, perhaps, with our  
spiritually awakened dead friends and family waiting for rebirth.) ;-).

Leon Maurer

**http://canonizer.com/topic.asp/23/13
http://www.tellworld.com/Astro.Biological.Coenergetics/
>
> Mitch Raemsch
>



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]